Eur J Pediatr Surg 2018; 28(01): 081-088
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607061
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Duhamel and Transanal Endorectal Pull-throughs for Hirschsprung' Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Shogo Seo
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Hiromu Miyake
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Alison Hock
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Yuhki Koike
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Chen Yong
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Carol Lee
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Bo Li
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Agostino Pierro
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 April 2017

14 August 2017

Publication Date:
28 September 2017 (online)

Abstract

Aim The Duhamel pull-through and transanal endorectal pull-through (TEPT) are commonly used for the treatment of Hirschsprung's disease (HD). To date, there has been no meta-analysis evaluating postoperative outcomes following Duhamel pull-through and TEPT. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare patient outcome after Duhamel pull-through and TEPT for HD.

Materials and Methods Original articles published between 1998 and 2016 were identified using the MEDLINE database. Studies comparing Duhamel pull-through and TEPT were included. Outcomes evaluated included incidence of postoperative constipation, incontinence/soiling, enterocolitis, anastomotic stricture, and leak. We analyzed dichotomous variables by estimating odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and continuous variables using the weighted mean difference with 95% CI. The meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.3.

Result There were no randomized controlled trials. Seven observational clinical studies were included, comprising 260 cases of Duhamel pull-through and 170 cases of TEPT. Anastomotic stricture (OR = 0.10; 95%CI 0.02–0.48; p = 0.004) was lower following Duhamel pull-through than TEPT. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative incontinence/soiling and anastomotic leak. After TEPT, postoperative constipation seems to be lower and enterocolitis higher compared with those after Duhamel pull-through; however, these differences are not significant when the follow-up period is equal between groups.

Conclusion The Duhamel pull-through seems to be associated with lower incidence of anastomotic stricture compared with TEPT. The effects of the two analyzed operative techniques on constipation and enterocolitis remain unclear. The quality of evidence supporting the above findings is suboptimal, indicating the need for prospective studies.

 
  • References

  • 1 Skaba R. Historic milestones of Hirschsprung's disease (commemorating the 90th anniversary of Professor Harald Hirschsprung's death). J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (01) 249-251
  • 2 Duhamel B. A new operation for the treatment of Hirschsprung's disease. Arch Dis Child 1960; 35: 38-39
  • 3 Ikeda K. New techniques in the surgical treatment of Hirschsprung's disease. Surgery 1967; 61 (04) 503-508
  • 4 Soper RT. Surgery for Hirschsprung's disease. AORN J 1968; 8 (03) 69-81
  • 5 Soave F. A new surgical technique for treatment of Hirschsprung's disease. Surgery 1964; 56: 1007-1014
  • 6 Boley SJ. New modification of the surgical treatment of Hirschsprung's disease. Surgery 1964; 56: 1015-1017
  • 7 De la Torre-Mondragón L, Ortega-Salgado JA. Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (08) 1283-1286
  • 8 Langer JC, Durrant AC, de la Torre L. , et al. One-stage transanal Soave pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease: a multicenter experience with 141 children. Ann Surg 2003; 238 (04) 569-583
  • 9 Kim AC, Langer JC, Pastor AC. , et al. Endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease-a multicenter, long-term comparison of results: transanal vs transabdominal approach. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (06) 1213-1220
  • 10 Ishikawa N, Kubota A, Kawahara H. , et al. Transanal mucosectomy for endorectal pull-through in Hirschsprung's disease: comparison of abdominal, extraanal and transanal approaches. Pediatr Surg Int 2008; 24 (10) 1127-1129
  • 11 El-Sawaf MI, Drongowski RA, Chamberlain JN, Coran AG, Teitelbaum DH. Are the long-term results of the transanal pull-through equal to those of the transabdominal pull-through? A comparison of the 2 approaches for Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (01) 41-47
  • 12 Elhalaby EA, Hashish A, Elbarbary MM. , et al. Transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a multicenter study. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (03) 345-351
  • 13 Obermayr F, Szavay P, Beschorner R, Fuchs J. Outcome of transanal endorectal pull-through in patients with Hirschsprung's disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19 (04) 220-223
  • 14 Gosemann JH, Friedmacher F, Ure B, Lacher M. Open versus transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review of long-term outcome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (02) 94-102
  • 15 Wells GA, O'Connell D, Peterson J. , et al. Available at http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp . Accessed November 12, 2013
  • 16 Giuliani S, Betalli P, Narciso A. , et al. Outcome comparison among laparoscopic Duhamel, laparotomic Duhamel, and transanal endorectal pull-through: a single-center, 18-year experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21 (09) 859-863
  • 17 Gunnarsdóttir A, Larsson LT, Arnbjörnsson E. Transanal endorectal vs. Duhamel pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20 (04) 242-246
  • 18 Tannuri AC, Tannuri U, Romão RL. Transanal endorectal pull-through in children with Hirschsprung's disease--technical refinements and comparison of results with the Duhamel procedure. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (04) 767-772
  • 19 Huang Y, Zheng S, Xiao X. A follow-up study on postoperative function after a transanal Soave 1-stage endorectal pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (09) 1691-1695
  • 20 Martins EC, Peterlini FL, Fagundes DJ, Martins JL. Clinical, manometric and profilometric evaluation after surgery for Hirschsprung's disease: comparison between the modified Duhamel and the transanal rectosigmoidectomy techniques. Acta Cir Bras 2009; 24 (05) 416-422
  • 21 Menezes M, Corbally M, Puri P. Long-term results of bowel function after treatment for Hirschsprung's disease: a 29-year review. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22 (12) 987-990
  • 22 Minford JL, Ram A, Turnock RR. , et al. Comparison of functional outcomes of Duhamel and transanal endorectal coloanal anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (02) 161-165 , discussion 161–165
  • 23 Tannuri AC, Ferreira MA, Mathias AL, Tannuri U. Long-term results of the Duhamel technique are superior to those of the transanal pullthrough: A study of fecal continence and quality of life. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (03) 449-453
  • 24 Chatoorgoon K, Pena A, Lawal TA, Levitt M. The problematic Duhamel pouch in Hirschsprung's disease: manifestations and treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2011; 21 (06) 366-369
  • 25 Nasr A, Langer JC. Evolution of the technique in the transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: effect on outcome. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (01) 36-39 , discussion 39–40
  • 26 Dasgupta R, Langer JC. Evaluation and management of persistent problems after surgery for Hirschsprung disease in a child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008; 46 (01) 13-19
  • 27 Yanchar NL, Soucy P. Long-term outcome after Hirschsprung's disease: patients' perspectives. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34 (07) 1152-1160
  • 28 Ruttenstock E, Puri P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enterocolitis after one-stage transanal pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung's disease. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26 (11) 1101-1105
  • 29 Georgeson KE. Hirschsprung's Disease. In: Holcomb III GW, Murphy JP. , eds. Ashcraft's Pediatric Surgery. 5th ed. Oxford: Elsevier LTD; 2010
  • 30 Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. Long-term outcomes of Hirschsprung's disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 2012; 21 (04) 336-343
  • 31 Teitelbaum DH, Coran AG. Long-term results and quality of life after treatment of Hirschsprung's disease and allied disorders. In: Holschneider AM, Puri P. , eds. Hirschsprung's Disease and Allied Disorders. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2008: 389-397
  • 32 Rouzrokh M, Khaleghnejad AT, Mohejerzadeh L, Heydari A, Molaei H. What is the most common complication after one-stage transanal pull-through in infants with Hirschsprung's disease?. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26 (10) 967-970
  • 33 Zhang SC, Bai YZ, Wang W, Wang WL. Clinical outcome in children after transanal 1-stage endorectal pull-through operation for Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (08) 1307-1311