Efficacy of Epidural Analgesia after Laparotomy in Children
10 October 2017
16 January 2018
19 February 2018 (online)
Background Epidural analgesia (EDA) is used as postoperative pain treatment in children, but little is known about its efficacy after laparotomy in children. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy of postoperative EDA after laparotomy in children and the frequencies of adverse effects and complications.
Materials and Methods Data of all children aged 0 to 18 years undergoing laparotomy and treated with EDA in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2015 were collected. EDA was classified as successful either if the catheter was removed when there was no further need, and the patient was comfortable with oral/rectal analgesics or when EDA was continued after intervention.
Results Ninety children with a median age of 3.7 years were included in the study. In 65% (59/90), EDA was classified as successful. In 34% (20/59) of all successful cases, an additional intervention was needed. In 35% (31/90), the catheter was removed earlier than planned, in half of these cases after an intervention. The primary reason for earlier removal was inadequate analgesia and technical failure. Adverse effects occurred in 18% and complications in 1% of cases. The successful group was significantly younger than the unsuccessful (p = 0.003).
Conclusion EDA after laparotomy positively contributed to postoperative pain treatment in two-thirds of children. Numbers of adverse effects and complications were low. It is important to optimize pain management after laparotomy in children; thus, further prospective studies should focus on optimizing EDA and comparing EDA with other techniques of analgesia.
- 1 Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufré E, Orliaguet G, Courrèges P. ; Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF). Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth 2010; 20 (12) 1061-1069
- 2 Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, McNally S, Harrison E, Wigmore S. Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (12) 1224-1230
- 3 Moriarty A. Pediatric epidural analgesia (PEA). Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22 (01) 51-55
- 4 Verghese ST, Hannallah RS. Acute pain management in children. J Pain Res 2010; 3: 105-123
- 5 Schnabel A, Thyssen NM, Goeters C. , et al. Age- and procedure-specific differences of epidural analgesia in children--a database analysis. Pain Med 2015; 16 (03) 544-553
- 6 Warmann SW, Lang S, Fideler F. , et al. Perioperative epidural analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal tumor surgery--a single center experience. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (04) 551-555
- 7 Llewellyn N, Moriarty A. The national pediatric epidural audit. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17 (06) 520-533
- 8 Wong GK, Arab AA, Chew SC, Naser B, Crawford MW. Major complications related to epidural analgesia in children: a 15-year audit of 3,152 epidurals. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60 (04) 355-363
- 9 Jöhr M. Regional anaesthesia in neonates, infants and children: an educational review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32 (05) 289-297
- 10 Jylli L, Lundeberg S, Olsson GL. Retrospective evaluation of continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46 (06) 654-659
- 11 Brislin RP, Rose JB. Pediatric acute pain management. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2005; 23 (04) 789-814 , x
- 12 Ecoffey C. Safety in pediatric regional anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22 (01) 25-30
- 13 Polaner DM, Taenzer AH, Walker BJ. , et al. Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN): a multi-institutional study of the use and incidence of complications of pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2012; 115 (06) 1353-1364
- 14 Boerlage AA, Ista E, Duivenvoorden HJ, de Wildt SN, Tibboel D, van Dijk M. The COMFORT behaviour scale detects clinically meaningful effects of analgesic and sedative treatment. Eur J Pain 2015; 19 (04) 473-479
- 15 van Dijk M, de Boer JB, Koot HM, Tibboel D, Passchier J, Duivenvoorden HJ. The reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants. Pain 2000; 84 (2–3): 367-377
- 16 van Dijk M, Peters JW, van Deventer P, Tibboel D. The COMFORT Behavior Scale: a tool for assessing pain and sedation in infants. Am J Nurs 2005; 105 (01) 33-36
- 17 McCaffery M, Pasero C. Pain: Clinical Manual. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby Inc; 1999
- 18 Strandness T, Wiktor M, Varadarajan J, Weisman S. Migration of pediatric epidural catheters. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 25 (06) 610-613
- 19 Lönnqvist PA, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, Suresh S, Ivani G. The European society of regional anesthesia and pain therapy and the American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine joint committee practice advisory on controversial topics in pediatric regional anesthesia I and II: what do they tell us?. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30 (05) 613-620