Technical Aspects in Esophageal Lengthening: An Investigation of Traction Procedures and Suturing Techniques in Swine

Abstract

Introduction Traction procedures are useful to preserve the child's own esophagus in long-gap forms of esophageal atresia. To date, it remains unclear what suture size or position of the traction sutures is optimal to account for differences in anatomy and to reduce the risk of traction sutures being torn out of the esophageal tissue.

Materials and Methods Explanted porcine esophagi (from swine aged 100–120 days and weighing 100–120 kg) were divided at the carinal level. Traction sutures were either placed circumferentially or only in the dorsal wall and the breaking strength—circumferential disruption of the muscular layer—was measured. Suture size (USP 4–0 vs. 5–0) was also evaluated in a similar way.

Results Neither traction suture position did not influence breaking strengths between circumferentially placed traction sutures or those exclusively placed in the dorsal esophageal wall (Δ = 0.47 N, 95% confidence interval: −2.83 to 3.76 N, p = 0.771, n = 11 per group) nor differing suture sizes of USP 4–0 and USP 5–0 (Δ = 1.46 N, 95% confidence interval: −3.2 to 0.28 N, p = 0.0946, n = 9 per group) affected breaking strengths.

Conclusion Suture size and suture positioning do not affect mechanical stability in Foker's procedure and therefore can be adapted as needed according to patient's anatomy and size.

Keywords

esophageal - suturing - traction procedure - esophageal surgery

• References

• 1 Bairdain S, Zurakowski D, Vargas SO. , et al. Long-gap esophageal atresia is a unique entity within the esophageal atresia defect spectrum. Neonatology 2017; 111 (02) 140-144
• 2 Nasr A, Langer JC. Mechanical traction techniques for long-gap esophageal atresia: a critical appraisal. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (03) 191-197
• 3 Foker JE, Linden BC, Boyle Jr EM, Marquardt C. Development of a true primary repair for the full spectrum of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 1997; 226 (04) 533-541
• 4 Mochizuki K, Obatake M, Taura Y. , et al. A modified Foker's technique for long gap esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28 (08) 851-854
• 5 Abraham MK, Sudarsanan B, Viswanath N. , et al. A safer way of suturing in Foker's technique. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (08) 1819-1821
• 6 van der Zee DC, Gallo G, Tytgat SHA. Thoracoscopic traction technique in long gap esophageal atresia: entering a new era. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (11) 3324-3330
• 7 Bairdain S, Ricca R, Riehle K. , et al. Early results of an objective feedback-directed system for the staged traction repair of long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (10) 2027-2031
• 8 Paya K, Schlaff N, Pollak A. Isolated ultra-long gap esophageal atresia - successful use of the foker technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2007; 17 (04) 278-281
• 9 Bagolan P, Valfrè L, Morini F, Conforti A. Long-gap esophageal atresia: traction-growth and anastomosis - before and beyond. Dis Esophagus 2013; 26 (04) 372-379
• 10 Sroka M, Wachowiak R, Losin M. , et al. The Foker technique (FT) and Kimura advancement (KA) for the treatment of children with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA): lessons learned at two European centers. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (01) 3-7
• 11 Takada Y, Kent G, Filler RM. Circular myotomy and esophageal length and safe esophageal anastomosis: an experimental study. J Pediatr Surg 1981; 16 (03) 343-348
• 12 Behrend M, Kluge E, Schüttler W, Klempnauer J. Breaking strength of native and sutured trachea. An experimental study on sheep trachea. Eur Surg Res 2001; 33 (04) 255-263
• 13 Sommer G, Schriefl A, Zeindlinger G. , et al. Multiaxial mechanical response and constitutive modeling of esophageal tissues: Impact on esophageal tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2013; 9 (12) 9379-9391
• 14 Lang IM. Upper esophageal sphincter. GI Motility online. 2006. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gimo12 . Accessed September 30, 2018
• 15 The R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018
• 16 Efron B. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 1987; 82 (397) 171-185
• 17 Hesterberg TC. What teachers should know about the bootstrap: resampling in the undergraduate statistics curriculum. Am Stat 2015; 69 (04) 371-386
• 18 Magniafico S. rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. 2018. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion . Accessed September 30, 2018
• 19 Lopes MF, Catré D, Cabrita A, Pires A, Patrício J. Effect of traction sutures in the distal esophagus of the rat: a model for esophageal elongation by Foker's method. Dis Esophagus 2008; 21 (06) 570-573
• 20 Sullins VF, Traum PK, French SW, Wu BM, Dunn JCY, Lee SL. A novel method of esophageal lengthening in a large animal model of long gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (06) 928-932
• 21 Livaditis A, Jönsson L. The piglet in experimental pediatric surgery. Z Versuchstierkd 1979; 21 (02) 78-82
• 22 Christensen MB, Oberg K, Wolchok JC. Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue. Springerplus 2015; 4: 142
• 23 Khoorjestan SM, Rouhi G, Toolabi K. An investigation of the effects of suture patterns on mechanical strength of intestinal anastomosis: an experimental study. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2017; 62 (04) 429-437
• 24 Oetzmann von Sochaczewski C, Tagkalos E, Lindner A, Heimann A, Lang H, Muensterer OJ. Suture strength correlates linearly with bite length in a porcine esophageal anastomosis model. Eur Surg Res 2017; 58 (5–6) 313