Synthesis 2021; 53(10): 1760-1770
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1706639
paper

N-Chlorinative Ring Contraction of 1,4-Dimethoxyphthalazines via a Bicyclization/Ring-Opening Mechanism

Jeong Kyun Im
,
Ilju Jeong
,
ByeongDo Yang
,
Hyeon Moon
,
Jun-Ho Choi
,
Won-jin Chung
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (NRF-2020R1F1A1076028) and by ‘GIST Research Institute (GRI)’ grant funded by the GIST in 2020.


Abstract

An unprecedented N-chlorinative ring contraction of 1,2-diazines was discovered and investigated with an electrophilic chlorinating reagent, trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCICA). Through optimization and mechanistic analysis, the assisting role of n-Bu4NCl as an exogenous nucleophile was identified, and the optimized reaction conditions were applied to a range of 1,4-dimethoxyphthalazine derivatives. Also, an improvement of overall efficiency was demonstrated by the use of a labile O-silyl group. A bicyclization/ring-opening mechanism, inspired by the Favorskii rearrangement, was proposed and supported by the DFT calculations. Furthermore, the efforts on scope expansion as well as the evaluation of other electrophilic promoters revealed that the newly developed ring contraction reactivity is a unique characteristic of 1,4-dimethoxyphthalazine scaffold and TCICA.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 26 October 2020

Accepted after revision: 14 November 2020

Article published online:
21 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References


    • Reviews:
    • 1a Joshi U, Pipelier M, Naud S, Dubreuil D. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005; 9: 261
    • 1b Csende F, Miklós F, Porkoláb A. Curr. Org. Chem. 2010; 14: 745

      Chemical reduction:
    • 2a Thompson TW. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1968; 532
    • 2b Longridge JL, Thompson TW. J. Chem. Soc. C 1970; 1658
    • 2c Bach NJ, Kornfeld EC, Jones ND, Chaney MO, Dorman DE, Paschal JW, Clemens JA, Smalstig EB. J. Med. Chem. 1980; 23: 481
    • 2d Gewald K, Hain U. Synthesis 1984; 62
    • 2e Somei M, Inoue S, Tokutake S, Yamada F, Kaneko C. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981; 29: 726
    • 2f Bruce JM. J. Chem. Soc. 1959; 2366
    • 2g Sugimoto A, Tanaka H, Eguchi Y, Ito S, Takashima Y, Ishikawa M. J. Med. Chem. 1984; 27: 1300
    • 2h Brown GR, Foubister AJ, Wright B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984; 1373
    • 2i Boger DL, Coleman RS, Panek JS, Yohannes D. J. Org. Chem. 1984; 49: 4405
    • 2j A representative example of total synthesis: Oakdale JS, Boger DL. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 1132
    • 2k Silva PJ. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 4653

      Electrochemical reduction:
    • 3a Lund H, Lunde P. Acta Chem. Scand. 1967; 21: 1067
    • 3b Lund H. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1968; 45: 193
    • 3c Manh GT, Hazard R, Pradère JP, Tallec A, Raoult E, Dubreuil D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 647
    • 3d Manh GT, Hazard R, Tallec A, Pradère JP, Dubreuil D, Thiam M, Toupet L. Electrochim. Acta 2002; 47: 2833

      Photochemical ring contraction:
    • 4a Hatch CE, Johnson PY. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974; 15: 2719
    • 4b Johnson PY, Hatch CE. III. J. Org. Chem. 1975; 40: 909
    • 4c Johnson PY, Hatch CE. III. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1975; 725
    • 4d Johnson PY, Schmuff NR, Hatch CE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975; 4089
  • 5 Thermal ring contraction: Galanin NE, Yakubov LA, Shaposhnikov GP. Macroheterocycles 2010; 3: 41
  • 6 Electrophile-promoted, oxidative ring contraction is known for triazine derivatives: Gazieva GA, Karpova TB, Nechaeva TV, Kravchenko AN. Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 2016; 65: 2172
    • 7a Parrick J, Ragunathan R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993; 211
    • 7b Omote Y, Yamamoto H, Sugiyama N. J. Chem. Soc. D 1970; 914
  • 8 Im JK, Yang B, Jeong I, Choi J.-H, Chung W.-j. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020; 61: 152048
  • 9 Shiri A, Khoramabadizad A. Synthesis 2009; 2797
  • 10 Clement RA. J. Org. Chem. 1960; 25: 1724
  • 11 Kealy TJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962; 84: 966
  • 12 Ineffective reagents include N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS), 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantion (DCDMH), Palau’Chlor, 2,3,4,5,6,6-hexachlorocyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one (HCCO), N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide (NFSI), and SelectfluorTM.
  • 13 Other soluble chloride such as Me4NCl exhibited comparable promoting reactivity. In contrast, insoluble chloride such as LiCl was completely ineffective.
  • 14 Other common reductive workup procedures with aq Na2S2O3 or aq NaHSO3 resulted in less quantitative mass recovery.
  • 15 An approximate 1H NMR yield of 8a was measured with 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as an internal standard. From the reaction of 6a with TCICA (4 equiv) and n-Bu4NCl (4 equiv), ca. 42% yield of 8a was observed in the crude mixture, and a small amount of 7 was detected as the only major side product. This result indicates the moderate ring contraction efficiency as well as the intractable decomposition of 6a during the reaction. See the SI for details.
  • 16 Prabhakar V, Babu KS, Ravindranath LK, Lakshmireddy I, Latha J. Heterocycl. Lett. 2016; 6: 643
  • 17 Yanilkin VV, Buzykin BI, Morozov VI, Nastapova NV, Maksimyuk NI, Eliseenkova RM. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2001; 71: 1636
    • 18a Kende AS. Org. React. 1960; 11: 261
    • 18b Akhrem AA, Ustynyuk TK, Titov YA. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1970; 39: 732
    • 18c Chenier PJ. J. Chem. Educ. 1978; 55: 286
    • 18d Guijarro D, Yus M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005; 9: 1713
    • 19a Rees CW, Sale AA. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1973; 545
    • 19b Laakso PV, Robinson R, Vandrewala HP. Tetrahedron 1957; 1: 103
  • 20 The activation free energy for the N–N bond cleavage in i was estimated to be >70 kcal/mol by DFT calculation (see the SI).
    • 21a Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008; 120: 215
    • 21b Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008; 41: 157
    • 22a Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. J. Chem. Phys. 2010; 132: 154104
    • 22b Peverati R, Baldridge KK. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008; 4: 2030
  • 23 Marenich AV, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009; 113: 6378
    • 24a Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su S, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA. Jr. J. Comput. Chem. 1993; 14: 1347
    • 24b Gordon MS, Schmidt MW. Advances in Electronic Structure Theory: GAMESS a Decade Later. In Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry: The First Forty Years. Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2005: 1167-1189
    • 24c The General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System. https://www.msg.chem.iastate.edu/gamess/
  • 25 The initial input geometry was obtained by Molecular Orbital PACkage 2016 Stewart JJ. P. Stewart Computational Chemistry. Colorado Springs (USA): 2016 http://openmopac.net/
  • 26 3-D structures were obtained using CYLview 1.0b Legault CY. Sherbrooke (Canada): Université de Sherbrooke; 2009 http://www.cylview.org.
    • 27a Gobbi A, Frenking G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993; 1162
    • 27b Bronzolino N, Grandinetti F. J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 2003; 635: 221
  • 28 The addition of NaBH4 as an EtOH solution led to vigorous quenching and lower yields.
  • 29 Najda-Bernatowicz A, Łebska M, Orzeszko A, Kopańska K, Krzywińska E, Muszyńska G, Bretner M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009; 17: 1573
  • 30 Clapham KM, Batsanov AS, Greenwood RD. R, Bryce MR, Smith AE, Tarbit B. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 2176
  • 31 Chuang KV, Xu C, Reisman SE. Science 2016; 353: 912