Eur J Pediatr Surg 2021; 31(03): 252-260
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710534
Original Article

Clinical Prediction Scores for Pediatric Appendicitis

1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
,
Emma Marklund
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
,
Lars Hagander
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
,
Martin Salö
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study received its financial support from Bengt Ihres Foundation.

Abstract

Introduction The rate of misdiagnosis of appendicitis in children is a challenge and clinical prediction scores could be part of the solution. However, the pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) and the Alvarado score have shown disappointing diagnostic accuracy in pediatric validation studies, while the appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and the novel pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) have not yet been validated thoroughly. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate these four prediction scores prospectively in children with suspected appendicitis.

Materials and Methods A prospective study was conducted over a 2-year period. All patients <15 years with suspected appendicitis were eligible for inclusion. The four prediction scores were compared regarding predictive values, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical outcome.

Results Of the 318 patients included, 151 (47 %) patients had appendicitis. The AIR score and the pARC had substantially higher specificity and positive predictive value, and lower rate of false positives (7% and 2%), than the PAS and Alvarado score (36 and 28%, p < 0.001). Across the different gender and age groups, the AIR score and the pARC generally had fewer false positives than the PAS and Alvarado score. There were no significant differences in sensitivity, negative predictive values, rates of missed appendicitis, or ROC curve analysis. In decision curve analysis, the AIR score and the pARC outperformed the PAS and Alvarado score at most threshold probabilities.

Conclusion The AIR score and the pARC are superior to the PAS and Alvarado score in diagnosing children with suspected appendicitis.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 25 November 2019

Accepted: 07 April 2020

Article published online:
26 May 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132 (05) 910-925
  • 2 Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. J Epidemiol 2010; 20 (02) 97-105
  • 3 GlobalSurg Collaborative. Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Br J Surg 2016; 103 (08) 971-988
  • 4 Marzuillo P, Germani C, Krauss BS, Barbi E. Appendicitis in children less than five years old: a challenge for the general practitioner. World J Clin Pediatr 2015; 4 (02) 19-24
  • 5 Horwitz JR, Gursoy M, Jaksic T, Lally KP. Importance of diarrhea as a presenting symptom of appendicitis in very young children. Am J Surg 1997; 173 (02) 80-82
  • 6 Salö M, Ohlsson B, Arnbjörnsson E, Stenström P. Appendicitis in children from a gender perspective. Pediatr Surg Int 2015; 31 (09) 845-853
  • 7 Graff L, Russell J, Seashore J. et al. False-negative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7 (11) 1244-1255
  • 8 Stiell IG, Wells GA. Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33 (04) 437-447
  • 9 Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15 (05) 557-564
  • 10 Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (06) 877-881
  • 11 Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 2008; 32 (08) 1843-1849
  • 12 Goldman RD, Carter S, Stephens D, Antoon R, Mounstephen W, Langer JC. Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr 2008; 153 (02) 278-282
  • 13 Bhatt M, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, Dougherty G, McGillivray D. Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16 (07) 591-596
  • 14 Bond GR, Tully SB, Chan LS, Bradley RL. Use of the MANTRELS score in childhood appendicitis: a prospective study of 187 children with abdominal pain. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19 (09) 1014-1018
  • 15 Macklin CP, Radcliffe GS, Merei JM, Stringer MD. A prospective evaluation of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79 (03) 203-205
  • 16 van Amstel P, Gorter RR, van der Lee JH, Cense HA, Bakx R, Heij HA. Ruling out appendicitis in children: can we use clinical prediction rules?. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23 (10) 2027-2048
  • 17 de Castro SM, Ünlü C, Steller EP, van Wagensveld BA, Vrouenraets BC. Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis. World J Surg 2012; 36 (07) 1540-1545
  • 18 Kollár D, McCartan DP, Bourke M, Cross KS, Dowdall J. Predicting acute appendicitis? A comparison of the Alvarado score, the appendicitis inflammatory response score and clinical assessment. World J Surg 2015; 39 (01) 104-109
  • 19 Macco S, Vrouenraets BC, de Castro SM. Evaluation of scoring systems in predicting acute appendicitis in children. Surgery 2016; 160 (06) 1599-1604
  • 20 Kharbanda AB, Vazquez-Benitez G, Ballard DW. et al. Development and validation of a novel pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC). Pediatrics 2018; 141 (04) e20172699
  • 21 Carr NJ. The pathology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol 2000; 4 (01) 46-58
  • 22 Emil S, Gaied F, Lo A. et al. Gangrenous appendicitis in children: a prospective evaluation of definition, bacteriology, histopathology, and outcomes. J Surg Res 2012; 177 (01) 123-126
  • 23 St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Holcomb III GW, Ostlie DJ. An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (12) 2242-2245
  • 24 Herd ME, Cross PA, Dutt S. Histological audit of acute appendicitis. J Clin Pathol 1992; 45 (05) 456-458
  • 25 Pieper R, Kager L, Näsman P. Clinical significance of mucosal inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Ann Surg 1983; 197 (03) 368-374
  • 26 Campbell JS, Fournier P, Dasilva T. When is the appendix normal? A study of acute inflammations of the appendix apparent only upon histologic examination. Can Med Assoc J 1961; 85: 1155-1157
  • 27 Dingemann J, Metzelder M, Kuebler JF, Ure B. Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis in children: May a macroscopically normal appendix be left in situ?. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19 (03) 153-156
  • 28 Pogorelić Z, Rak S, Mrklić I, Jurić I. Prospective validation of Alvarado score and Pediatric Appendicitis Score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2015; 31 (03) 164-168
  • 29 Vickers AJ, Van Calster B, Steyerberg EW. Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests. BMJ 2016; 352: i6
  • 30 Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R. Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49 (06) 778-784 , 784.e1
  • 31 Mandeville K, Pottker T, Bulloch B, Liu J. Using appendicitis scores in the pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29 (09) 972-977
  • 32 Andersson M, Kolodziej B, Andersson RE, Group SS. STRAPPSCORE Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of appendicitis inflammatory response score-based management of patients with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg 2017; 104 (11) 1451-1461
  • 33 Escribá A, Gamell AM, Fernández Y, Quintillá JM, Cubells CL. Prospective validation of two systems of classification for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27 (03) 165-169
  • 34 Dingemann J, Ure B. Imaging and the use of scores for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (03) 195-200
  • 35 Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP. et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380 (9840): 499-505
  • 36 Löfvenberg F, Salö M. Ultrasound for appendicitis: performance and integration with clinical parameters. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 5697692
  • 37 Kulaylat AN, Moore MM, Engbrecht BW. et al. An implemented MRI program to eliminate radiation from the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (08) 1359-1363
  • 38 Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E. et al. Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics 2014; 133 (04) 586-593
  • 39 Sincavage J, Buonpane C, Benyamen B. et al. Alvarado scores predict additive value of magnetic resonance imaging in workup of suspected appendicitis in children. J Surg Res 2019; 244: 42-49
  • 40 Yardeni D, Hirschl RB, Drongowski RA, Teitelbaum DH, Geiger JD, Coran AG. Delayed versus immediate surgery in acute appendicitis: do we need to operate during the night?. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (03) 464-469
  • 41 Schnüriger B, Laue J, Kröll D, Inderbitzin D, Seiler CA, Candinas D. Introduction of a new policy of no nighttime appendectomies: impact on appendiceal perforation rates and postoperative morbidity. World J Surg 2014; 38 (01) 18-24
  • 42 Andersson RE. Does delay of diagnosis and treatment in appendicitis cause perforation?. World J Surg 2016; 40 (06) 1315-1317
  • 43 Kutasy B, Hunziker M, Laxamanadass G, Puri P. Increased incidence of negative appendectomy in childhood obesity. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26 (10) 959-962