Effects of Sucrose and Nonnutritive Sucking on Pain Behavior in Neonates and Infants undergoing Wound Dressing after Surgery: A Randomized Controlled TrialFunding This research project was supported by Siriraj Research Development Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (grant number [IO] R016131014). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, and preparation of the manuscript.
Introduction Wound dressing, a procedure that pediatric patients are commonly exposed to postoperatively, can cause strong physiological and pain behavioral responses despite being brief. This study evaluated the effects of using 24% sucrose plus a pacifier versus a pacifier alone to reduce the pain response from dressing wounds in neonates and infants.
Materials and Methods Thirty-two neonates and infants who underwent surgery and required postoperative wound dressing were randomized to a pacifier group (n = 16) and a 24% sucrose plus pacifier group (“sucrose group”; n = 16). Demographic data, crying time, and pain behaviors were recorded using a video recorder. The pain behaviors were assessed independently using the neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) by three assessors, who were expert in pediatric pain assessment and blinded to the subject allocations.
Results Participants in the sucrose group were older than those in the pacifier group (6.19 ± 2.95 vs. 3.88 ± 3.2 months). While there were no differences in the NIPS scores of the two groups at 30, 120, and 240 seconds, the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain was lower in the sucrose group than the pacifier group at 120 seconds (37.5 vs. 50%). The crying time was lower in the sucrose group, but without statistical significance.
Conclusion The 24% sucrose plus pacifier was not superior to the pacifier alone in decreasing pain behavioral responses. Dressing wound pain produced a high-intensity pain behavioral response. A pain management strategy should be developed to lessen the postoperative procedural pain in pediatric patients.
S.M. conceptualized the questionnaire, approved the final manuscript as submitted, conceptualized and designed the study, agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, and drafted the initial manuscript. K.B. acquired the data and drafted the initial manuscript. N.A. approved the final manuscript as submitted and drafted the initial manuscript. N.T. approved the final manuscript as submitted and drafted the initial manuscript. T.B. acquired the data and drafted the initial manuscript.
Eingereicht: 05. Juni 2020
Angenommen: 16. August 2020
17. September 2020 (online)
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
- 1 Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Committee on fetus and newborn and section on anesthesiology and pain. Prevention and management of procedural pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics 2016; 137 (02) e20154271
- 2 Stevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J. CIHR Team in Children's Pain. et al Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. CMAJ 2011; 183 (07) E403-E410
- 3 Lowery CL, Hardman MP, Manning N, Hall RW, Anand KJ, Clancy B. Neurodevelopmental changes of fetal pain. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31 (05) 275-282
- 4 Vinall J, Grunau RE. Impact of repeated procedural pain-related stress in infants born very preterm. Pediatr Res 2014; 75 (05) 584-587
- 5 Doesburg SM, Chau CM, Cheung TP. et al Neonatal pain-related stress, functional cortical activity and visual-perceptual abilities in school-age children born at extremely low gestational age. Pain 2013; 154 (10) 1946-1952
- 6 Walker SM. Biological and neurodevelopmental implications of neonatal pain. Clin Perinatol 2013; 40 (03) 471-491
- 7 Blackburn S. Environmental impact of the NICU on developmental outcomes. J Pediatr Nurs 1998; 13 (05) 279-289
- 8 Simons SH, Tibboel D. Pain perception development and maturation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 11 (04) 227-231
- 9 LaMontagne LL, Pawlak R. Stress and coping of parents of children in a pediatric intensive care unit. Heart Lung 1990; 19 (04) 416-421
- 10 Carbajal R, Gréteau S, Arnaud C, Guedj R. [Pain in neonatology. Non-pharmacological treatment]. Arch Pediatr 2015; 22 (02) 217-221
- 11 Pillai Riddell RR, Racine NM, Turcotte K. et al Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (10) CD006275
- 12 Harrison D, Beggs S, Stevens B. Sucrose for procedural pain management in infants. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (05) 918-925
- 13 Stevens B, Yamada J, Lee GY, Ohlsson A, Shorkey A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (01) CD001069
- 14 Suraseranivongse S, Kaosaard R, Intakong P. et al A comparison of postoperative pain scales in neonates. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97 (04) 540-544
- 15 Lee GY, Yamada J, Kyololo O, Shorkey A, Stevens B. Pediatric clinical practice guidelines for acute procedural pain: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2014; 133 (03) 500-515
- 16 Howard R, Carter B, Curry J. et al Good practice in postoperative and procedural pain management. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22 (01) 1-79
- 17 Lago P, Garetti E, Merazzi D. Pain Study Group of the Italian Society of Neonatology. et al Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98 (06) 932-939
- 18 Wilder-Smith OH, Arendt-Nielsen L. Postoperative hyperalgesia: its clinical importance and relevance. Anesthesiology 2006; 104 (03) 601-607
- 19 Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Hyperalgesia in a human model of acute inflammatory pain: a methodological study. Pain 1998; 74 (2-3): 139-151
- 20 Hatfield LA. Neonatal pain: what's age got to do with it?. Surg Neurol Int 2014; 5 (13, Suppl 13): S479-S489
- 21 McCord SS, Levy ML. Practice guide to pediatric wound care. Semin Plast Surg 2006; 20 (03) 192-199
- 22 Harrison D, Reszel J, Bueno M. et al Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 10 (10) CD011248