Download PDF
Planta Med 2017; 83(11): 921-936
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107881
Natural Product Chemistry and Analytical Studies
Original Papers
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Assessment of the Authenticity of Herbal Dietary Supplements: Comparison of Chemical and DNA Barcoding Methods

Rahul S. Pawar
Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA
,
Sara M. Handy
Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA
,
Raymond Cheng
Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA
,
Nicole Shyong
Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA
,
Erich Grundel
Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 28 December 2016
revised 13 March 2017

accepted 25 March 2017

Publication Date:
28 April 2017 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

About 7 % of the U. S. population reports using botanical dietary supplements. Increased use of such supplements has led to discussions related to their authenticity and quality. Reports of adulteration with substandard materials or pharmaceuticals are of concern because such substitutions, whether inadvertent or deliberate, may reduce the efficacy of specific botanicals or lead to adverse events. Methods for verifying the identity of botanicals include macroscopic and microscopic examinations, chemical analysis, and DNA-based methods including DNA barcoding. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations may fail when a supplement consists of botanicals that have been processed beyond the ability to provide morphological characterizations. Chemical analysis of specific marker compounds encounters problems when these compounds are not distinct to a given species or when purified reference standards are not available. Recent investigations describing DNA barcoding analysis of botanical dietary supplements have raised concerns about the authenticity of the supplements themselves as well as the appropriateness of using DNA barcoding techniques with finished botanical products. We collected 112 market samples of frequently consumed botanical dietary supplements of ginkgo, soy, valerian, yohimbe, and St. Johnʼs wort and analyzed each for specific chemical markers (i.e., flavonol glycosides, total isoflavones, total valerenic acids, yohimbine, and hypericins, respectively). We used traditional DNA barcoding techniques targeting the nuclear ITS2 gene and the chloroplast gene psbA-trnH on the same samples to determine the presence of DNA of the labelled ingredient. We compared the results obtained by both methods to assess the contribution of each in determining the identity of the samples.

Key words

dietary supplements - HPLC - DNA barcoding - adulteration - label claims

Supporting Information

    Chemical structures, examples of estimation of concentrations of marker compounds from label information, quantitative HPLC and LC-MS method information, and analysis of NIST botanical SRMs and trimmed DNA sequences are available as Supporting Information.

  • Supporting Information
 

  • References

  • 1 Bailey RL, Gahche JJ, Miller PE, Thomas PR, Dwyer JT. Why US adults use dietary supplements. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 355-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Du M, White E, Giovannucci EL. Trends in dietary supplement use among US adults from 1999–2012. JAMA 2016; 316: 1464-1474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wu CH, Wang CC, Tsai MT, Huang WT, Kennedy J. Trend and pattern of herb and supplement use in the United States: results from the 2002, 2007, and 2012 national health interview surveys. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014; 2014: 872320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cohen PA. Hazards of hindsight–monitoring the safety of nutritional supplements. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1277-1280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Betz JM, Garland T, Page SW. Safety of botanical dietary supplements. In: Shi J, Mazza G, Le Maguer M. eds. Functional Foods. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 6 103rd Congress Public Law 103-417. Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. Available at. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-108/pdf/STATUTE-108-Pg4325.pdf Accessed July 1, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Food and Drug Administration Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 121, 34752. Current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packaging, labeling, or holding operations for dietary supplements. Available at. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2007-06-25/pdf/07-3039.pdf Accessed July 1, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Smillie TJ, Khan IA. A comprehensive approach to identifying and authenticating botanical products. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010; 87: 175-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Khan IA, Smillie T. Implementing a “quality by design” approach to assure the safety and integrity of botanical dietary supplements. J Nat Prod 2012; 75: 1665-1673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chen S, Pang X, Song J, Shi L, Yao H, Han J, Leon C. A renaissance in herbal medicine identification: from morphology to DNA. Biotechnol Adv 2014; 32: 1237-1244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Muhammad Tahir H, Akhtar S. Services of DNA barcoding in different fields. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal 2016; 27: 4463-4474
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Applequist WL, Miller JS. Selection and authentication of botanical materials for the development of analytical methods. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012; 405: 4419-4428
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 de Boer HJ, Ichim MC, Newmaster SG. DNA barcoding and pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines. Drug Saf 2015; 38: 611-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Parveen I, Gafner S, Techen N, Murch SJ, Khan IA. DNA barcoding for the identification of botanicals in herbal medicine and dietary supplements: strengths and limitations. Planta Med 2016; 82: 1225-1235
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med 2013; 11: 222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 New York State Office of the Attorney General. A.G. Schneiderman asks major retailers to halt sales of certain herbal supplements as DNA tests fail to detect plant materials listed on majority of products tested. Available at. http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-schneiderman-asks-major-retailers-halt-sales-certain-herbal-supplements-dna-tests Accessed November 2, 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Food and Drug Administration. Nutrition labeling of dietary supplements 21CFR101.36. Available at. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=101.36 Accessed 30 Nov 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Avula B, Sagi S, Gafner S, Upton R, Wang YH, Wang M, Khan IA. Identification of Ginkgo biloba supplements adulteration using high performance thin layer chromatography and ultra high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector-quadrupole time of flight-mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015; 407: 7733-7746
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chandra A, Li Y, Rana J, Persons K, Hyun C, Shen S, Mulder T. Qualitative categorization of supplement grade Ginkgo biloba leaf extracts for authenticity. J Funct Foods 2011; 3: 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 United States Pharmacopeia. Powdered ginkgo extract. USP 2015; 38: 6264-6267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tian Z, Wan M, Wang Z, Wang B. The preparation of genistein and LC-MS/MS on-line analysis. Drug Dev Res 2004; 61: 6-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 United States Pharmacopeia. Powdered valerian. USP 2015; 38: 6249-6250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lucas D, Neal-Kababick J, Zweigenbaum J. Characterization and quantitation of yohimbine and its analogs in botanicals and dietary supplements using LC/QTOF-MS and LC/QQQ-MS for determination of the presence of bark extract and yohimbine adulteration. J AOAC Int 2015; 98: 330-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cohen PA, Wang YH, Maller G, DeSouza R, Khan IA. Pharmaceutical quantities of yohimbine found in dietary supplements in the USA. Drug Test Anal 2015; 8: 357-369
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sun J, Chen P. Chromatographic fingerprint analysis of yohimbe bark and related dietary supplements using UHPLC/UV/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2012; 61: 142-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 United States Pharmacopeia. Powdered St. Johnʼs wort extract. USP 2015; 38: 6211-6212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shah AK, Avery BA, Wyandt CM. Content analysis and stability evaluation of selected commercial preparations of St. Johnʼs wort. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005; 31: 907-916
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ivanova NV, Kuzmina ML, Braukmann TW, Borisenko AV, Zakharov EV. Authentication of herbal supplements using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0156426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rachmayanti Y, Leinemann L, Gailing O, Finkeldey R. DNA from processed and unprocessed wood: factors influencing the isolation success. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2009; 3: 185-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Makovetskaya EY. Flavonoids of certain species of Hypericum L. Chem Nat Compd 1999; 35: 582-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Soares PK, Scarminio IS. Multivariate chromatographic fingerprint preparation and authentication of plant material from the genus Bauhinia . Phytochem Anal 2008; 19: 78-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Harnly JM, Luthria D, Chen P. Detection of adulterated Ginkgo biloba supplements using chromatographic and spectral fingerprints. J AOAC Int 2012; 95: 1579-1587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Little DP. Authentication of Ginkgo biloba herbal dietary supplements using DNA barcoding. Genome 2014; 57: 513-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sucher NJ, Hennell JR, Carles MC. DNA fingerprinting, DNA barcoding, and next generation sequencing technology in plants. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 862: 13-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Harbaugh Reynaud D. Next-generation DNA testing for botanicals. Available at. http://www.nsf.org/newsroom_pdf/hs_next-generation_dna-testing_botanicals_no.pdf Accessed December 9, 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Palhares RM, Gonçalves Drummond M, Dos Santos Alves Figueiredo Brasil B, Pereira Cosenza G, das Graças Lins Brandão M, Oliveira G. Medicinal plants recommended by the World Health Organization: DNA barcode identification associated with chemical analyses guarantees their quality. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0127866
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Gray D, LeVanseler K, Meide P, Waysek EH. Evaluation of a method to determine flavonol aglycones in Ginkgo biloba dietary supplement crude materials and finished products by high-performance liquid chromatography: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2007; 90: 43-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 United States Pharmacopeia. Soy isoflavone tablets. USP 2015; 38: 6231-6233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lukas D. Application note: sample prep for trace analysis of adulterants in erectile dysfunction dietary supplements. Available at. http://www.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-3638EN.pdf Accessed December 6, 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 European Pharmacopeia. St. Johnʼs wort dry extract, quantified. Ph Eur 2016; 80: 1393-1394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Gao T, Pang X, Luo K, Li Y, Li X, Jia X, Lin Y, Leon C. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 2010; 5: e8613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Sang T, Crawford D, Stuessy T. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am J Bot 1997; 84: 1120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Tate JA, Simpson BB. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst Bot 2003; 28: 723-737
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Handy SM, Parks MB, Deeds JR, Liston A, de Jager LS, Luccioli S, Kwegyir-Afful E, Fardin-Kia AR, Begley TH, Rader JI, Diachenko GW. Use of the chloroplast gene ycf1 for the genetic differentiation of pine nuts obtained from consumers experiencing dysgeusia. J Agric Food Chem 2011; 59: 10995-11002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012; 28: 1647-1649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 www.Geneious.com. Available at. http://www.geneious.com/ Accessed November 2, 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar