Synthesis 1997; 1997(5): 515-517
DOI: 10.1055/s-1997-1223
short paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag, Rüdigerstr. 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany. All rights reserved. This journal, including all individual contributions and illustrations published therein, is legally protected by copyright for the duration of the copyright period. Any use, exploitation or commercialization outside the narrow limits set by copyright legislation, without the publisher's consent, is illegal and liable to criminal prosecution. This applies in particular to photostat reproduction, copying, cyclostyling, mimeographing or duplication of any kind, translating, preparation of microfilms, and electronic data processing and storage.

Substitution with Sulfur at the Sterically Hindered Neopentyl Position: Preparation of 9-Mercaptocamphor and 9,10-Epithiocamphor

Bernhard Koppenhoefer1 , Horst Völlenkle2 , Hans-Georg Brendle3 , Marc Schwierskott3
  • 1Institut für Organische Chemie der Universität, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany, Fax +49(7071)292037
  • 2Institut für Mineralogie, Kristallographie und Strukturchemie der TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9, A-1000 Vienna, Austria
  • 3Institut für Organische Chemie der Universität, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

A variety of methods for SN2 substitution at sterically hindered 9-bromocamphor (2) was tested for the preparation of 9-mercaptocamphor (1), a fragrant compound with a roasty note reminiscent of onion. All reagents failed, with the notable exception of potassium thioacetate in N-methylpyrrolidone (for 3 days at 180°C). The peculiar reactivity pattern of both neopentyl-type 2 and 9,10-dibromocamphor (9) involves surprisingly smooth substitution reactions where strain is released. Thus, 9 was transformed into tricyclic 9,10-epithiocamphor 12, as established by X-ray analysis.

    >