Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war der Vergleich der prä-, intra- und postoperativen
Situation in phaken und pseudophaken Augen mit frischer Amotio retinae, um ein Risikoprofil
für den Operationserfolg nach primärer Amotiochirurgie zu erstellen. Patienten und Methoden: 220 konsekutive Patienten mit primärer Amotio retinae, 165 phake und 55 pseudophake
Augen wurden einer Buckelchirurgie (Plombe/Cerklage) allein oder in Kombination mit
einer Vitrektomie unterzogen. Prä-, intra- und postoperative Risikofaktoren wurden
erfasst und deren Einfluss auf das anatomische und funktionelle Resultat mittels einer
multivariaten Regressionsanalyse verglichen. Ergebnisse: Die kumulativen anatomischen Erfolgsraten nach 6 Monaten waren in phaken (88,5 %)
und pseudophaken (86,3 %) Augen gleich (log rank = 0,340). Die Amotioausdehnung erwies
sich in pseudophaken Augen als ein stärkerer Risikofaktor für die Beeinträchtigung
des operativen Erfolges als in phaken Augen (p = 0,035). Bei phaken Augen zeigte sich
kein Einfluss der Amotioausdehnung auf das chirurgische Resultat (1 Quadrant vs. 4
Quadranten; log rank = 0,135); während bei Pseudophakie eine Beeinträchtigung der
Amotioausdehnung auf das chirurgische Resultat nachweisbar war (1 Quadrant vs. > 4
Quadranten; log rank < 0,001). Das relative Risiko einer Reamotio nach operativer
Versorgung einer Amotio retinae ab 3 Quadranten betrug bei Normophakie 1,22 (CI: 0,71
- 1,70) und bei Pseudophakie 1,81 (CI: 0.88 - 2,59). Schlussfolgerungen: Bis zu einer Amotioausdehnung von 3 Quadranten weisen phake und pseudophake Augen
ähnliche chirurgische Erfolgsraten auf. Ab einer Ausdehnung der Amotio retinae größer
als neun Stunden findet sich im pseudophaken Auge, im Gegensatz zum phaken Auge, bei
alleiniger eindellender Operation ein negativer Einfluss der Amotioausdehnung auf
den Operationserfolg. Dieser kann durch ein kombiniertes extra- und intraokulares
Vorgehen mit Vitrektomie reduziert werden.
Abstract
Background: To compare the preoperative risk profiles of phakic and pseudophakic eyes with primary
retinal detachment and to assess their impact on the outcome of primary reattachment
surgery. Patients and methods: 220 consecutive patients with primary retinal detachment, 165 phakic and 55 pseudophakic
eyes were operated with scleral buckling alone or additional vitrectomy and followed
up for 6 months. Pre-, intra- and postoperative risk factors were recorded and their
impact on anatomical outcome after primary surgery in phakic and pseudophakic eyes
was then compared in a multivariate regression analysis. Results: The cumulative probability of anatomical success 6 months after surgery was similar
in phakic (88.5 %) and pseudophakic eyes (86.3 %; log rank = 0.340). The most important
risk factor for a different surgical outcome between phakic and pseudophakic eyes
was the size of retinal detachment (p = 0.035). In phakic eyes the size of retinal
detachment had no significant impact on surgical outcome (1 vs. 4 quadrants; log rank
= 0.135); whereas in pseudophakic eyes a significant impairment on surgical outcome
was found (1 vs. 4 quadrants; log rank < 0.001). The relative risk for failure of
primary surgery due to retinal detachment of at least 3 quadrants was in phakic eyes
1.22 (CI: 0.71 - 1.70), in pseudophakic ones 1.81 (CI: 0.88 - 2.59). Conclusions: The outcome of primary retinal reattachment surgery in phakic and pseudophakic eyes
is similar for retinal detachments up to 3 quadrants. In retinal detachments of more
than 9 clock times, the size of retinal detachment impairs the surgical outcome in
pseudophakic eyes more than in phakic ones. The combination of extraocular surgery
with vitrectomy in pseudophakic eyes with retinal detachment of more than 9 clock
times contributes to a better outcome.
Schlüsselwörter
Netzhautablösung - Normophakie - Pseudophakie - Risikofaktoren
Key words
Retinal detachment - surgical procedures - phakia, pseudophakia - risk factor, outcome
assessment
References
1
Haimann M H, Burton T C, Brown C K.
Epidemiology of retinal breaks.
Arch Ophthalmol.
1982;
100
289-292
2
Minihan M, Tanner V, Williamson T H.
Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2001;
85
546-548
3
Ah-Fat F G, Sharma M, Majid M A, McGalliard J N, Wong D.
Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996.
Br J Ophthalmol.
1999;
83
396-398
4
Gray R H, Evans A R, Constable I J, McAllister I L.
Retinal detachment and its relation to cataract surgery.
Br J Ophthalmol.
1989;
73
775-780
5
Pervical S P, Anand V, Das S K.
Prevalence of aphakic retinal detachment.
Br J Ophthalmol.
1983;
7
43-45
6
Claymann H M, Jaffe N S, Light D S, Jaffe M S, Cassady J C.
Intraocular lenses, axial length, and retinal detachment.
Am J Ophthalmol.
1981;
92
778-780
7
Stark W J, Maumenee A E, Fagadau W R, Hirst L H, Datiles M B.
Intraocular lenses: experience at the Wilmer Institute.
Austr J Ophthalmol.
1983;
11
95-102
8
Kratz R P, Mazzocco T R, Davidson B D.
A comparative analysis of anterior chamber, iris supported, capsule-fixated, and posterior
chamber intraocular lenses following cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.
Ophthalmology.
1981;
88
56-58
9
Javitt J C, Vitale S, Canner J K, Krakauer H, McBean A M, Sommer A.
National outcomes of cataract extraction I. Retinal detachment after inpatient surgery.
Ophthalmology.
1991;
98
895-902
10
Leff S R, Welch C J, Tasman W.
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after YAG laser capsulotomy.
Ophthalmology.
1987;
94
1222-1225
11
Yoshida A, Ogasawara H, Jalkh A E, Sanders R J, McMeel J W, Schepens C L.
Retinal detachment after cataract surgery. Predisposing factors.
Ophthalmology.
1992;
99
453-459
12
Yoshida A, Ogasawara H, Jalkh A E, Sanders R J, McMeel J W, Schepens C L.
Retinal detachment after cataract surgery. Surgical results.
Ophthalmology.
1992;
99
460-465
13
Bovey E H, Gonvers M, Sahli O.
Traitement chirurgical du décollement de rétine chez le pseudophaque: comparison entre
la vitrectomie et la compression épisclérale.
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd.
1998;
212
314-317
14
Bradford J D, Wilkinson C P, Fransen S P.
Pseudophakic retinal detachments.
Retina.
1989;
3
181-186
15
Wilkinson C P.
Retinal detachments following intraocular lens implantation.
Ophthalmology.
1981;
88
410-413
16
Wilkinson C P.
Pseudophakic retinal detachments.
Retina.
1985;
5
1-4
17
Törnquist R, Bodin L, Törnquist P.
Retinal detachment: a study of a population-based patient material in Sweden 1971
- 1981. IV. Prediction of surgical outcome.
Acta Ophthalmol.
1988;
66
637-642
18
Törnquist R, Törnquist P.
Retinal detachment: a study of a population-based patient material in Sweden 1971
- 1981. III. Surgical results.
Acta Ophthalmol.
1988;
66
630-636
19
American Academy of Ophthalmology .
The repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.
Ophthalmology.
1990;
97
1562-1572
20
Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt K U, Hilgers R D, Foerster M H.
Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR
Study): Design issues and implications. SPR Study Report No. 1.
Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2001;
239
567-574
21
Newmann D R, Burton R L.
Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachments.
Eye.
1999;
13
635-639
22
The Retina Society Terminology Committee .
The classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
Ophthalmology.
1983;
90
121-125
23
Törnquist R, Stenkula S, Törnquist P.
Retinal detachment. A study of a population-based patient material in Sweden 1971
- 1981. I. Epidemiology.
Acta Ophthalmol.
1987;
65
223-230
24
Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Friedrichs W, Helbig H, Kellner U, Korra A, Foerster M H.
Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
1996;
234
561-568
25
Binkhorst C D.
Corneal and retinal complications after cataract extraction.
Ophthalmology.
1980;
87
609-617
26
Rachal W F, Burton T C.
Changing concepts of failures after retinal detachment surgery.
Arch Ophthalmol.
1979;
97
480-483
27
Yusuke O, Kazuyuki E, Masanobo M, Yamanishi S.
Survey of surgical indications and results of primary pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous
retinal detachment.
Jpn J Ophthalmol.
1999;
43
120-126
28
Cowley M, Conway B P, Camochiaro P A, Kaiser D, Gaskin H.
Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
Arch Ophthalmol.
1989;
107
1147-1151
29
Girard P, Mimoun G, Karpouzas I, Montefiore G.
Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment
surgery.
Retina.
1994;
14
417-424
30
Devenyi R G, de Carvalho Nakamura H.
Combined scleral buckle and pars plana vitrectomy as primary procedure for pseudophakic
retinal detachments.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers.
1999;
30
615-618
31
Oshima Y, Emi K, Motokura M, Yamanishi S.
Survey of surgical indications and results of primary pars plana vitrectomy for rheghmatogenous
retinal detachments.
Jpn J Ophthalmol.
1999;
43
120-126
32
Bartz-Schmidt K U, Kirchhof B, Heimann K.
Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment.
Br J Ophthalmol.
1996;
80
346-349
33
Ho P C, Tolentino F I.
Pseudophakic retinal detachment. Surgical success rate with various types of IOLs.
Ophthalmology.
1984;
91
847-852
34
Vatane H O, Syrdalen P.
Retinal detachment after intraocular lens implantation.
Acta Ophthalmol.
1986;
64
544-546
35
Schwartz S G, Kuhl D P, McPherson A R, Holz E R, Mieler W F.
Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling.
Arch Ophthalmol.
2002;
120
325-329
36
Chignell A H, Fison L G, Davies E W, Hartley R E, Gundry M F.
Failure in retinal detachment surgery.
Mod Probl Ophthalmol.
1974;
12
20-28
37
Wong D, Billington B M, Chignell A H.
Pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment with unseen retinal holes.
Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
1987;
225
269-271
38
Sullivan P M, Luff A J, Aylward G W.
Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: a prospective audit.
Eye.
1997;
11
869-871
39
Hakin K N, Lavin M J, Leaver P K.
Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
1993;
231
344-346
40
Cousins S, Boniuk I, Okun E, Johnston G P, Arribas N P, Escoffery R F, Burgess D B,
Grand M G, Olk R J, Schoch L H.
Pseudophakic retinal detachments in the presence of various IOL types.
Ophthalmology.
1986;
93
1198-1208
41
Hagler W S.
Pseudophakic retinal detachment.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc.
1982;
80
45-63
Markus Halberstadt,MD
Dept. of Ophthalmology · Inselspital
3010 Bern · Switzerland
Email: markus.halberstadt@insel.ch