Key words aromatherapy -
Brevibacterium spp. - bromodosis - malodour - interactions - essential oils - antimicrobial
Introduction
Foot odour (bromodosis) is a distressing disorder (both socially and medically) and
is caused by the release of sulphur compounds generated by potent proteolytic enzymes
produced by Brevibacterium
[1 ], [2 ], [3 ], [4 ]. These bacteria are Gram-positive, catalase-positive, obligate aerobic bacilli.
There appears to be a constant concern with regards to body hygiene and malodour,
making the use of agents such as fragrant deodorants and antiperspirants one of the
largest cosmetic sellers globally [5 ], [6 ]. The global antiperspirant and deodorant market is estimated to be an industry worth
US$72.7 billion (estimates for 2018) [7 ]. One of the most important personal care products is deodorant. It is a product
that continues to retain constant investment by companies to improve quality, and
formulations include aerosols, roll-ons, and gels [7 ]. Deodorants are applicable as a spray to body parts and the feet, whereas antiperspirants
decrease sweat. Both are aimed at inhibiting the bacteria causing malodour.
The limitations of current available treatments are that they may be inconvenient,
expensive, require extensive application, and are often disconcerting due to the reoccurrence
of odour after ceasing treatment [8 ]. Furthermore, deodorants and antiperspirants may contain antimicrobial substances;
however, with the amount of antimicrobial chemicals [such as propylene glycol, triclosan,
benzalkonium chloride, and metal (e.g., aluminium) salts] being added to combat these
bacteria, there is a constant concern of the toxicity and potential resistance to
these ingredients [9 ], [10 ], [11 ].
By 2014, the antibiotic industry was estimated to be worth approximately US$65.5 billion
[12 ]. The worth of the global antibiotic market is still on the rise, especially because
of the high cost of developing new drugs or finding alternatives to the ever-growing
antibiotic resistance issues. A contributor to the poor availability of resistant
free antibiotics is the lack of newer antibiotics for the last two decades. Investment
is aimed at either developing new antibiotics or identifying alternative antibiotic
treatments. Alternatives would, in fact, be preferable if one considers the high costs
involved in research and development (R&D), and the rate at which resistance is developing,
which is faster than the rate at which new antibiotics can even be developed. This
is evident by the fact that the net worth of the antibiotic industry is dominated
by generic manufacturers and only a few new patented products [13 ].
The global fragrance market is predicted to be worth US$ 43.6 billion by 2021. Closely
following the household product sector, the second largest market share for fragrance
products is personal care, and one of the key elements in fragrances is essential
oils [14 ]. Essential oils are frequently used in dermatology, and 5% of essential oils used
in dermatology are recommended for body odour [15 ]. This is not surprising considering the pleasant fragrance imparted by these natural
products. It is not only the pleasant organoleptic properties that render essential
oils appealing in treating bromodosis, but also the antimicrobial activity displayed
by these essential oils. Promising activity has been observed for essential oils against
body odour-causing bacteria [16 ]. Essential oils are, however, predominantly used in combination, yet the recommended
combinations as contained in the laymanʼs literature against foot malodour have yet
to be investigated [17 ], [18 ], [19 ], [20 ], [21 ], [22 ], [23 ], [24 ], [25 ], [26 ], [27 ], [28 ]. No reports could be found reporting antimicrobial resistance against essential
oil combinations.
Thus, with essential oils having potential antimicrobial activity, they are an attractive
option for treating malodorous bacteria involved in bromodosis. To the R&D industry,
the odour-inducing bacteria are not a priority, yet clearly by the predicted worth
of the fragrance industry and the fact that personal care is the second largest contributor
to this value, foot odour should be considered important. The natural origin of essential
oils also makes them an appealing alternative to consumers.
This study is the first to investigate the antimicrobial activity of essential oil
combinations against odour-inducing bacteria and aims to find the most promising oils
to be used in combination.
Results
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 19 commercial essential oils, not
previously investigated, are shown in [Table 1 ]. Brevibacterium agri and Brevibacterium epidermidis appeared to be the most susceptible to essential oil inhibition and were inhibited
by 18 and 19 essential oils, respectively, at a noteworthy concentration (MIC ≤ 1.00 mg/mL).
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood) was found to display the strongest inhibitory activity (MIC values of
0.01 – 0.13 mg/mL).
Table 1 The mean MIC (n = 3) values of the individual essential oils investigated against
Brevibacterium spp.
Essential oils
B. agri (ATCC 51663)
B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)
B. linens (DSM 20425)
* Noteworthy activity (bold)
Abies balsamea (balsam)
1.00*
0.50
1.00
Cinnamomum verum (cinnamon bark)
0.25
0.25
0.19
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (cinnamon leaf)
0.25
0.25
0.50
Cistus ladanifer (rock rose) 1
1.00
0.25
1.00
Cistus ladanifer (rock rose) 2
0.38
0.38
1.00
Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)
0.50
0.25
0.67
Foeniculum dulce (fennel)
1.00
0.25
1.00
Hypericum perforatum (St Johns wort)
2.00
1.00
2.00
Matricaria recutita (German chamomile)
0.25
0.38
0.50
Mentha spicata (spearmint)
0.50
0.50
2.00
Nardostachys jatamansi (spikenard)
1.00
0.75
3.00
Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil aromatics) 1
0.50
0.50
1.00
Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil SE) 2
1.00
0.50
1.00
Origanum vulgare (oregano)
0.19
0.25
0.50
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
0.50
0.50
1.00
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1
0.25
0.25
0.50
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 2
0.50
0.25
0.50
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)
0.01
0.13
0.13
Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 2
0.13
0.13
0.50
Control (Ciprofloxacin)
8.3 × 103 µg/mL
2.61 × 10 µg/mL
6.25 × 10 µg/mL
From the 119 combinations against each of the Brevibacterium spp., it can be observed ([Table 2 ]) that 118 combinations resulted in noteworthy antimicrobial activity against B. agri , 117 against B. epidermidis (most associated with odour), and 91 against Brevibacterium linens , proving the latter of the three as being the most resilient against antimicrobial
inhibition. The combinations based on aromatherapeutic literature are shown as shaded
areas. No antagonism was observed in any of the combinations.
Table 2 The mean MIC (n = 3) and ΣFIC values of the essential oil combinations investigated
against odour-inducing bacteria.
Essential oil combinations
Mean MIC (mg/mL) (n = 3) and ΣFIC
B. agri (ATCC 51663)
B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)
B. linens (DSM 20425)
Essential oil 1
Essential oil 2
MIC1*
MIC2*
MIC
ΣFIC
MIC1
MIC2
MIC
ΣFIC
MIC1
MIC2
MIC
ΣFIC
* Individual MIC values taken from [16 ]. § Noteworthy activity (bold). † Synergistic interaction (bold italics). ‡Combinations
selected purely from the aromatherapeutic literature (shaded)
Achillea millefolium (yarrow)
Citrus sinensis (orange)
1.00
1.00
0.75§
0.75
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.58
1.50
1.00
2.00
1.67
Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)‡
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
0.25
2.00
1.00
2.25
Boswellia carteri (frankincense)
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.75
2.00
Juniperus virginiana (juniper)
0.50
2.00
1.00
1.25
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50†
0.25
1.00
0.75
1.88
Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
0.50
1.00
0.75
1.13
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
0.25
1.00
1.00
2.50
Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 1
0.50
0.05
0.19
2.06
1.00
0.19
0.19
0.59
0.25
0.19
0.23
1.04
Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 2
0.50
0.13
0.19
0.91
1.00
0.13
0.19
0.81
0.25
0.50
0.75
2.25
Citrus aurantium var. amara leaf (petitgrain)
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
Cupressus sempervirens (cypress)
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.17
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.25
0.63
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.25
2.00
1.00
3.00
2.25
Commiphora myrrha (myrrh)
Citrus aurantifolia (lime)
0.38
1.00
0.50
0.91
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.75
0.38
1.00
0.50
0.91
Allium sativum (garlic)
1.00
0.13
0.13
0.54
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.67
0.38
0.50
0.75
1.74
Coriandrum sativum (coriander)
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.42
Piper nigrum (black pepper)
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
0.50
0.38
0.50
1.16
3.00
2.00
2.00
0.83
Salvia sclarea (clary sage)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.33
Syzygium aromaticum (clove)
1.00
0.50
0.75
1.13
0.50
0.38
0.50
1.16
3.00
0.50
1.00
1.17
Boswellia carteri (frankincense)
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
3.00
0.75
1.00
0.83
Zingiber officinale (ginger)
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.33
Santalum album (sandalwood)
1.00
0.31
0.30
0.63
0.50
0.25
0.25
0.75
3.00
0.25
0.50
1.08
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)
1.00
0.01
0.07
3.54
0.50
0.13
0.13
0.61
3.00
0.13
0.50
2.01
Cupressus sempervirens (cypress)
Salvia sclarea (clary sage)
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.17
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.25
2.00
1.00
1.50
1.13
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.17
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
Commiphora myrrha (myrrh)
0.75
0.38
0.13
0.26
0.50
0.25
0.25
0.75
2.00
0.38
0.50
0.78
Citrus sinensis (orange)
0.75
1.00
0.50
0.58
0.50
0.75
0.50
0.83
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.50
Cymbopogon citratus (lemongrass)
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
0.25
1.00
0.50
1.25
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
0.25
1.00
0.50
1.25
0.50
1.00
0.38
0.56
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
1.50
0.67
2.00
1.67
1.66
Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)
0.50
0.38
0.75
1.74
0.25
0.50
0.50
1.50
0.67
1.00
1.50
1.87
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.75
0.67
1.00
1.00
1.25
Foeniculum dulce (fennel)
Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)
1.00
0.38
1.00
1.82
0.25
0.50
0.50
1.50
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
1.50
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
Santalum album (sandalwood)
1.00
0.31
0.75
1.58
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.25
1.00
2.50
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)
1.00
0.01
0.08
3.84
0.25
0.13
0.13
0.73
1.00
0.13
0.75
3.26
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1
1.00
0.25
0.50
1.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 2
1.00
0.50
0.38
0.56
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
Juniperus virginiana (juniper)
Styrax benzoin (benzoin)
2.00
0.50
0.13
0.16
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.38
1.00
0.75
0.42
0.49
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
2.00
1.00
0.75
0.56
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
2.00
0.75
0.56
Salvia sclarea (clary sage)
2.00
1.00
0.75
0.56
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
Cupressus sempervirens (cypress)
2.00
0.75
0.75
0.69
1.00
0.50
0.38
0.56
1.00
2.00
0.50
0.38
Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)
2.00
1.00
0.75
0.56
1.00
0.38
0.50
0.91
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
Citrus limon (lemon)
2.00
1.00
0.75
0.56
1.00
0.50
0.38
0.56
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
Citrus aurantifolia (lime)
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.38
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
Citrus reticulata (mandarin)
2.00
1.00
0.75
0.56
1.00
1.50
0.63
0.52
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus sinensis (orange)
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.58
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Pinus sylvestris (pine)
2.00
1.00
0.75
0.56
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
2.00
1.00
1.50
1.13
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Santalum album (sandalwood)
2.00
0.31
0.31
0.58
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.63
1.00
0.25
0.50
1.25
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)
2.00
0.01
0.06
3.14
1.00
0.13
0.13
0.54
1.00
0.13
0.75
3.26
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
Anthemis nobilis (chamomile)
1.00
1.50
1.00
0.83
1.00
2.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
Matricaria recutita (German chamomile)
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.63
1.00
0.38
0.50
0.91
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
Citrus limon (lemon)
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus reticulata (mandarin)
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.50
0.50
0.42
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus sinensis (orange)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.58
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Pogostemon patchouli (patchouli)
1.00
0.09
0.19
1.14
1.00
0.50
0.63
0.94
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.58
Leptospermum scoparium (manuka)
Citrus aurantifolia (lime)
0.38
1.00
1.00
1.82
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Allium sativum (garlic)
0.38
0.13
0.13
0.65
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.58
0.50
0.50
1.00
2.00
Litsea cubeba (may chang)
Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)
0.13
0.38
0.25
1.29
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
0.13
1.00
0.25
1.09
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Citrus aurantium var. amara flower (neroli)
0.13
0.50
0.19
0.91
1.00
1.00
0.55
0.55
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.25
Citrus sinensis (orange)
0.13
1.00
0.22
0.95
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.17
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Citrus aurantium var. amara leaf (petitgrain)
0.13
1.00
0.50
2.17
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
0.50
1.00
2.00
3.00
Cananga odorata (ylang ylang)
0.13
0.50
0.25
1.21
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.30
0.45
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
0.13
0.50
0.25
1.21
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
Ocimum basilicum (basil)
0.13
1.25
0.25
1.06
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
0.50
1.00
0.65
0.98
Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil aromatics) 1
0.13
0.50
0.25
1.21
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil SE) 2
0.13
1.00
0.25
1.09
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
0.50
0.50
0.42
0.83
1.00
2.00
1.50
1.13
Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)
0.50
1.00
0.75
1.13
0.50
0.38
0.25
0.58
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Juniperus virginiana (juniper)
0.50
2.00
1.00
1.25
0.50
1.00
0.42
0.63
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.38
1.00
1.00
0.83
0.83
Citrus limon (lemon)
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus aurantium var. amara flower (neroli)
0.50
0.50
1.00
2.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
Citrus sinensis (orange)
0.50
1.00
0.42
0.63
0.50
0.75
0.42
0.69
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.42
0.63
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Santalum album (sandalwood)
0.50
0.31
0.31
0.81
0.50
0.25
0.13
0.38
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.63
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)
0.50
0.01
0.08
3.88
0.50
0.13
0.25
1.21
1.00
0.13
0.75
3.26
Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.50
1.50
1.00
0.67
0.50
0.62
Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
0.38
1.00
1.00
1.82
0.50
0.50
0.42
0.83
1.00
2.00
1.00
0.75
Citrus limon (lemon)
0.38
1.00
1.00
1.82
0.50
0.50
0.25
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)
0.38
1.00
0.50
0.91
0.50
0.38
0.42
0.96
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
0.38
1.00
0.50
0.91
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.38
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Juniperus virginiana (juniper)
0.38
2.00
0.50
0.78
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
Citrus aurantium var. amara flower (neroli)
0.38
0.50
0.50
1.16
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus sinensis (orange)
0.38
1.00
0.50
0.91
0.50
0.75
0.42
0.69
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
0.38
1.00
0.50
0.91
0.50
1.00
0.42
0.63
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Santalum album (sandalwood)
0.38
0.31
0.25
0.73
0.50
0.25
0.19
0.56
1.00
0.25
0.50
1.25
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)
0.38
0.01
< 0.01
0.46
0.50
0.13
0.25
1.21
1.00
0.13
0.50
2.17
Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)
0.38
0.50
0.50
1.16
0.50
0.25
0.25
0.75
1.00
0.67
1.00
1.25
Pinus sylvestris (pine)
Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.75
1.88
Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus)
1.00
0.50
0.38
0.56
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
1.00
1.00
0.78
0.78
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree)
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.50
1.00
0.83
Pogostemon patchouli (patchouli)
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
0.09
0.50
0.33
2.19
0.50
0.50
0.13
0.26
0.75
1.00
0.50
0.58
Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)
0.09
0.50
0.25
1.64
0.50
1.00
0.38
0.56
0.75
0.25
0.50
1.33
Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)
0.09
0.38
0.25
1.72
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.50
0.58
Commiphora myrrha (myrrh)
0.09
0.38
0.25
1.72
0.50
0.25
0.25
0.75
0.75
2.00
0.38
0.35
Santalum album (sandalwood)
0.09
0.31
0.13
0.90
0.50
0.25
0.22
0.66
0.75
0.25
0.38
1.00
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)
0.09
0.01
0.05
2.89
0.50
0.13
0.13
0.61
0.75
0.13
0.25
1.13
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1
Citrus reticulata (mandarin)
0.25
1.00
0.50
1.25
0.25
1.50
0.38
0.88
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 2
Citrus reticulata (mandarin)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.25
1.50
0.25
0.58
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
Salvia sclarea (clary sage)
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.75
1.13
1.00
2.00
1.50
1.13
Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)
1.00
0.50
0.45
0.68
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.75
1.88
Boswellia carteri (frankincense)
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.25
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.17
Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)
1.00
0.38
0.50
0.91
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)
1.00
1.00
0.69
0.69
1.00
0.38
0.50
0.91
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
Citrus aurantifolia (lime)
1.00
1.00
0.63
0.63
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Citrus reticulata (mandarin)
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.50
0.88
0.73
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
Syzygium aromaticum (clove)
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.38
0.50
0.50
1.16
0.50
2.00
0.50
0.63
Citrus limon (lemon)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.38
0.50
0.50
1.16
0.50
1.00
0.67
1.00
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.38
1.00
0.50
0.91
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
Thymus vulgaris (thyme)
Citrus limon (lemon)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.67
0.67
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.58
0.58
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.83
0.63
Pinus sylvestris (pine)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.67
0.67
Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.67
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.83
0.83
B. agri had four synergistic, 68 additive, and 47 indifferent interactions and B. epidermidis had 12 synergistic, 85 additive, and 22 indifferent interactions. B. linens had six synergistic, 52 additive, and 61 indifferent interactions.
The synergistic combination with the lowest MIC value of 9.00 µg/mL against B. agri was when Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium) was combined with S. austrocaledonicum . The most effective synergistic combination against B. epidermidis was Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium) with Santalum album (sandalwood) (MIC = 0.13 mg/mL) and against B. linens , it was Litsea cubeba (may chang) with Cananga odorata (ylang ylang) (MIC = 0.30 mg/mL).
The combination of Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood) with Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 1 (MIC values ranging 0.19 – 0.23 mg/mL) and the combination of Pogostemon patchouli (patchouli) and S. austrocaledonicum (MIC values ranging 0.05 – 0.25 mg/mL) displayed the overall strongest inhibition
against all three Brevibacterium spp. Four additional combinations could also be noted for strong inhibition against
two of the Brevibacterium spp. and noteworthy activity against a third. These include C. atlantica with V. zizanioides
2 , Coriandrum sativum (coriander) with S. austrocaledonicum, Foeniculum dulce (fennel) with S. austrocaledonicum , and Juniperus virginiana (juniper) with S. austrocaledonicum .
The combination of J. virginiana and Styrax benzoin (benzoin) displayed synergy against each of the three Brevibacterium spp., with noteworthy MIC values ranging from 0.13 – 0.42 mg/mL and fractional inhibitory
concentration index (ΣFIC) values from 0.16 – 0.49. This is encouraging considering
the pleasant organoleptic property offered by this combination.
The varied ratio combinations were further evaluated and plotted on isobolograms.
These are shown in [Figs. 1 ]–[4 ] with corresponding tables ([Tables 3 ]–[6 ]) that indicate the MIC at the different ratios.
Fig. 1 Isobologram representation of essential oils in combination against B. agri (ATCC 51663). ● [brown] C. sempervirens , ⋆ C. myrrha, ♦ P. odoratissimum , ▮ S. austrocaledonicum, ● [orange] S. sclarea , and ○ B. carteri in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 3 ]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.
Table 3 The concentrations of essential oils associated to the volume ratios studied against
B. agri (ATCC 51663).
Plot number*
Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2
Concentrations of essential oils in combination
C. sempervirens and C. myrrha
P. odoratissimum and S. austrocaledonicum
S. sclarea and B. carteri
µL
mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1
90 : 10
0.50
0.38
0.75
2
80 : 20
0.38
0.19
0.50
3
70 : 30
0.19
0.09
0.50
4
60 : 40
0.19
0.05
0.25
5
50 : 50
0.13
0.03
0.25
6
40 : 60
0.13
0.03
0.25
7
30 : 70
0.13
0.05
0.25
8
20 : 80
0.19
0.06
0.38
9
10 : 90
0.25
0.06
0.38
[Fig. 1 ] shows that the combinations of Cupressus sempervirens with Commiphora myrrha (myrrh), P. odoratissimum with S. austrocaledonicum , and Salvia sclarea (clary sage) with Boswellia carteri (frankincense) against B. agri . The combination of P. odoratissimum and S. austrocaledonicum predominantly requires S. austrocaledonicum to be in a higher concentration. Synergy was observed for combinations closest to
and including 1 : 1 ratios. These isobolograms demonstrate how important it is to
mix the essential oils in the appropriate ratios, as varied ratios can change the
interaction considerably. [Table 3 ] displays the MIC values of each ratio that corresponds to the combinations shown
in [Fig. 1 ].
[Fig. 2 ] (corresponds to [Table 4 ]) shows J. virginiana and S. benzoin essential oils in combination against the three Brevibacterium spp. It can also be observed that synergy results where the combination is closest
to the 1 : 1 ratio. S. benzoin, however, is a strong common denominator for synergy, as points 5 – 7 and even point
8 (B. linens ) where S. benzoin is in the higher ratio, synergy is demonstrated. Point 9, however, is consistently
an outlier against each Brevibacterium . These combinations (ratio mixes 6 : 4, 5 : 5, 4 : 6, and 3 : 7) should be strongly
considered for further formulation studies, especially as a neutral (men and women)
deodorant due to the earthly woody and vanilla smell offered by this combination.
Fig. 2 Isobologram representation of J. virginiana and S. benzoin essential oils in combination against the three Brevibacterium spp. ▲ J. virginiana and ▼ S. benzoin in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 4 ]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.
Table 4 The concentrations of the essential oil combination of J. virginiana and S. benzoin against all three Brevibacterium spp.
Plot number*
Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2
Concentrations of essential oils in combination
J. virginiana and S. benzoin
B. agri (ATCC 51663)
B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)
B. linens (DSM 20425)
µL
mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1
90 : 10
0.50
0.75
1.50
2
80 : 20
0.38
0.75
1.00
3
70 : 30
0.38
0.50
1.00
4
60 : 40
0.13
0.50
1.00
5
50 : 50
0.13
0.50
1.00
6
40 : 60
0.13
0.50
1.00
7
30 : 70
0.13
0.50
1.00
8
20 : 80
0.31
0.75
1.00
9
10 : 90
0.50
1.00
1.50
In [Fig. 3 ], it can be observed that all but one of the synergistic interactions against B. epidermidis containing the Pelargonium spp. is due to this oil (regardless of chemotype) being in the majority. Interestingly,
both Pelargonium spp. in combination with Lavandula angustifolia (lavender) reflect similar patterns where points 3 – 7 are synergistic. [Table 5 ] corresponds to the combinations shown in [Fig. 3 ].
Fig. 3 Isobologram representations of essential oils in combination containing Pelargonium spp. against B. epidermidis (DSM 20660). ♦ [red] Pelargonium spp., ▮ S. album, ♦ [purple] L. angustifolia, ● C. limon, and ▲ P. patchouli in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 5 ]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.
Table 5 The concentrations of essential oil combinations involving the Pelargonium spp. against B. epidermidis (DSM 20660).
Plot number*
Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2
Concentrations of essential oils in combination
P. patchouli and P. graveolens
P. graveolens and S. album
P. graveolens and L. angustifolia
P. odoratissimum and L. angustifolia
P. odoratissimum and C. limon
µL
mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1
90 : 10
0.38
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.50
2
80 : 20
0.25
0.25
0.50
0.38
0.25
3
70 : 30
0.19
0.19
0.25
0.25
0.25
4
60 : 40
0.13
0.19
0.25
0.25
0.25
5
50 : 50
0.13
0.19
0.25
0.25
0.25
6
40 : 60
0.13
0.19
0.38
0.25
0.25
7
30 : 70
0.13
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.50
8
20 : 80
0.13
0.25
0.75
0.75
1.00
9
10 : 90
0.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
1.50
[Fig. 4 ] (MIC of ratios shown in [Table 6 ]) displays J. virginiana in combination with different essential oils against B. epidermidis and B. linens , and in five of the six combinations, J. virginiana being used in the majority is shown to be responsible for the synergy.
Fig. 4 Isobologram representations of J. virginiana and essential oils in combination against the three B. epidermidis and B. linens . ▲ J. virginiana , ● [light brown] P. sylvestris , ● [red] R. officinali , ♦ L. angustifolia , ▮ C. atlantica , ● [orange] C. paradise , and ● [dark brown] C. sempervirens in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 6 ]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.
Table 6 The concentrations of essential oil combinations involving J. virginiana against B. epidermidis and B. linens .
Plot number*
Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2
Concentrations of essential oils in combination
B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)
B. linens (DSM 20425)
J. virginiana and R. officinalis
J. virginiana and P. sylvestris
J. virginiana and L. angustifolia
J. virginiana and C. atlantica
J. virginiana and C. paradisi
J. virginiana and C. sempervirens
µL
mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1
90 : 10
1.00
0.25
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
2
80 : 20
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.75
0.50
3
70 : 30
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
4
60 : 40
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
5
50 : 50
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
6
40 : 60
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.38
0.50
0.50
7
30 : 70
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.38
0.50
0.50
8
20 : 80
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.38
0.75
0.50
9
10 : 90
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
Discussion
The antimicrobial activity of the majority of the essential oils have been previously
reported against the three Brevibacterium species [16 ]. A selection of oils ([Table 1 ]) not previously studied have been added for a concise overview of antimicrobial
activity. S. austrocaledonicum displayed stronger antimicrobial activity against odour bacteria than S. album (0.25 – 0.31 mg/mL), possibly due to the higher α -santalol content [16 ]. P. odoratissimum (geranium) and P. graveolens (rose geranium) from this study were similar in activity [16 ]. Cinnamomum zeylanicum showed stronger antimicrobial inhibition against B. agri and B. epidermidis (0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL) compared to a previous study (0.50 – 1.50 mg/mL) [16 ], most likely due to the higher concentration of eugenol. Cinnamomum verum , containing cinnamaldehyde, allowed for a much higher antimicrobial activity to both
of the C. zeylanicum samples (0.19 – 0.25 mg/mL compared to 0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL). The V. zizanioides (vetiver) sample in this study is comparable to the sample used by Orchard et al.
[16 ]. Matricaria recutita (German chamomile) was shown to be the superior of the tested chamomile species with
MIC values of 0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL compared to that of Anthemis nobilis (Roman chamomile) (MIC 1.00 – 2.00 mg/mL) [16 ]. The two Rosa damascena (Rose otto) samples predominantly displayed equal inhibitory potential (0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL).
This shows a potential for this oil, not only because of the antimicrobial activity,
but also due to the additional pleasant organoleptic properties.
The high antimicrobial activities in combination together with the synergistic interactions
are encouraging findings considering that, although previously believed to be apathogenic,
Brevibacterium spp. have been reported as being involved in opportunistic infections in immunocompromised
patients [29 ], [30 ], [31 ], [32 ], [33 ], [34 ]. The essential oils occuring most frequently in the most noteworthy combinations
across all the Brevibacterium were the Santalum spp., P. patchouli , and Pelargonium spp. Importantly, these are also essential oils used in the fragrance industry.
A quick search of the top ten perfumes of America (2017) [35 ] include a number of ingredients of essential oil origin. If one were to identify
the most popular essential oils within these fragrances, patchouli and rose spp. are
in six of the perfumes. Ylang ylang, mandarin, and bergamot are in three, vetiver
and orange are in two, and geranium, lemongrass, lime, neroli, and sandalwood are
also present. What is encouraging to note is that the majority of these oils that
were used in the combinations investigated in this study displayed noteworthy antimicrobial
activity against the malodourous bacteria, and six [Pelargonium spp., P. patchouli, Citrus bergamia (bergamot), C. odorata , Santalum spp., and Citrus aurantifolia (lime)] were involved in synergistic interactions. The essential oils chosen by the
perfume industry were selected for their organoleptic properties. Success of these
essential oils is evident by the popularity and the ever-increasing value in the industry.
The antimicrobial activity displayed in this study highlights these fragrant essential
oils as options for treating malodour.
The essential oil found to predominantly contribute towards synergy was J. virginiana, as it was observed in 8 out of the 20 synergistic interactions. This is also an essential
oil recommended for body odour [17 ], [18 ], [19 ], [21 ], [22 ], [25 ], [26 ], [27 ], [28 ]. In addition, two essential oils that are also recommended for odour (Pelargonium spp. and L. angustifolia ) were also observed in several synergistic interactions. A previous study was also
able to report on several synergistic essential oil interactions in combination with
L. angustifolia , although it didnʼt investigate activity against odour-inducing bacteria [36 ].
The most frequently recommended combination for bromodosis was C. sempervirens (cypress) with L. angustifolia
[19 ]. This combination displayed noteworthy antimicrobial activity against each of the
Brevibacterium spp. (MIC 1.00 mg/mL). Interestingly, the majority of the combinations that demonstrated
synergy were those selected based on the noteworthy antimicrobial activity, and not
those combinations recommended in the laymanʼs aromatherapeutic literature.
No chemotype or variation in the plant species tested offered superior antimicrobial
activity when tested in combination against the different Brevibacterium species. This is reassuring as the design of fragrant deodorants may not necessarily
be limited to one chemotype. What is important, however, is that the results herein
reported be considered when selecting ingredients to formulate blends for treating
malodour. Besides the offered organoleptic properties, the selection should be based
on combinations that inhibit all three of the Brevibacterium species. There is rarely one bacterium present on the skin, thus antimicrobial activity
targeting all bacteria implicated in odour is desirable.
This is the first investigation to study the influence of the ratios against Brevibacterium spp. The dual action offered by essential oils regarding their array of pleasant
fragrance and noteworthy antimicrobial activity highlights some of these combinations
as credible options for the fragrant treatment of foot odour. Several combinations
(such as C. atlantica with V. zizanioides, P. patchouli with S. austrocaledonicum and J. virginiana with S. benzoin ) could be highlighted for not only use against bromodosis, but also as potential
combinations for developing formulations. This study provides scientific evidence
for the use of selected essential oil combinations for the treatment of bromodosis
and provides convincing preliminary data for their use in products promoting personal
hygiene.
Materials and Methods
Essential oil procurement and quality confirmation
The essential oils (56 in total) were selected and obtained from international flavour
and fragrance industries such as Givaudan (Dübendorf, Switzerland), Robertet (Grasse,
France) Burgess and Finch, PranaMonde, Essentia, Scatters Oils (Gauteng, South Africa),
Aromatics International, and Subtle Energies (Ayurveda aromatherapy). Additional chemotypes
and samples were included ([Table 1 ]) in addition to the essential oils reported previously [16 ] to determine the consistency in results from different fragrance companies and the
influence of the differences in major compound concentration. These are indicated
with numbers, e.g., Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1 and R. damascena (rose otto) 2 . The chemical compositions of the test essential oils have all previously been characterised
[16 ], [37 ].
Combination selection
The selection of 119 essential oil combinations was made firstly based on the frequency
of citation in the aromatherapeutic literature in treating treating body odour [17 ], [18 ], [19 ], [20 ], [21 ], [22 ], [23 ], [24 ], [25 ], [26 ], [27 ], [28 ]. Also included were essential oils where noteworthy activity was previously reported
against Brevibacterium spp. [16 ] and essential oils that were found by the researchers to exhibit a pleasant fragrance,
as these may add to the organoleptic selection for future formulation possibilities.
Preparation of cultures
The microorganisms used in this study were from ATCC and Deutsche Sammlung von Mikrooganismen
(DSM) strains. B. agri and B. epidermidis were grown in Tryptone Soya broth (TSB) (Oxoid) for 18 to 24 h at 37 °C and B. linens was grown in TSB and incubated at 30 °C for 4 days. All three Brevibacterium spp. were streaked onto Tryptone Soya agar (TSA) (Oxoid) plates and incubated accordingly
to confirm purity. A waiver for the use of these microorganisms was granted by the
University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference W-CJ-131026-3).
Minimum inhibitory concentration
The selected essential oil combinations were tested in 1 : 1 ratios using the broth
microdilution assay [37 ], where the total volume of 100 µL was comprised of 50 µL of each essential oil used
(Essential oil 1: Essential oil 2). Ciprofloxacin (purity ≥ 98.0%, Sigma-Aldrich),
at a concentration of 0.01 mg/mL, was included as a positive control to ensure microbial
susceptibility, and 32.00 mg/mL water in acetone was used as a negative control to
determine the antimicrobial effects of the solvents. A volume of 100 µL of an approximate
inoculum concentration of 1 × 106 colony forming units per mL (CFU/mL) of the tested microorganisms was added to each
well.
After the respective incubation periods, microtiter wells received 40 µL of 0.04%
w/v p -iodonitrotetrazolium violet solution (INT) (Sigma-Aldrich), and the MIC was evaluated
as the lowest concentration displaying no colour change. MIC values ≤ 1.00 mg/mL were
considered noteworthy [15 ], [16 ]. The individual and combined values were recorded and the ΣFIC was calculated.
The ΣFIC was calculated according to the following equations [38 ]:
* Where (a) is the MIC of the first essential oil in the combination and (b) is the
MIC of the second essential oil.
The FIC index was calculated to the sum ΣFIC = FIC (i) + FIC (ii). The ΣFIC for each
essential oil combination was interpreted as follows: ≤ 0.5 indicates synergy, > 0.5 – 1.0
is additive, > 1.0 – ≤ 4.0 indicates indifference, and > 4.0 indicates antagonism
[38 ].
Varied ratio combinations
Combinations that resulted in synergistic interactions were further evaluated at various
ratio combinations according to the described MIC assay; however, the oils were placed
in different ratios of 9 : 1, 8 : 2, 7 : 3, 6 : 4, 5 : 5, 4 : 6, 3 : 7, 2 : 8, and
1 : 9. The subsequent MICs of the different ratios were then captured and recorded
on an isobologram using GraphPad Prism (Version 5) software and the ratio points were
expressed graphically. This allowed for a graphical representation of the overall
interactive influence of each essential oil in combination [38 ]. Synergy was displayed where the data points fell beneath or on the 0.5 : 0.5 line.
Ratio points in the area above the 0.5 : 0.5 line and below and inclusive of the 1 : 1
line represent additive interactions. For data points above the 1 : 1 line and below
and inclusive of the 4 : 4 line, noninteractive effects were observed. Points above
the 4 : 4 line would indicate antagonism [38 ].
