Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1877-8770
Maternal Morbidity in the Second Stage of Labor: Analysis to Simulate the Clinical Choice
Funding None.

Abstract
Objective The aim of the study is to analyze maternal morbidity in the second stage of labor in a manner that approximates clinical choice.
Study Design The study design comprises secondary analysis of the Consortium for Safe Labor, which included 228,688 deliveries at 19 hospitals between 2002 and 2008. We included the 107,675 women who were undergoing a trial of labor without a prior uterine scar or history of substance abuse, who reached the second stage, with a liveborn, nonanomalous, vertex, singleton, at term of at least 2,500 g. Maternal complications included postpartum fever, hemorrhage, blood transfusion, thrombosis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hysterectomy, and death. For maternal complications, we simulated the clinical choice by comparing operative vaginal or cesarean deliveries to continued expectant management at every hour in the second stage. For neonatal complications, we modeled the risk of severe neonatal complication by second stage duration for spontaneous vaginal deliveries only, adjusting for maternal demographics, comorbidities, and delivery hospital. Severe neonatal complications included death, asphyxia, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), seizure, sepsis with prolonged stay, need for mechanical ventilation, and 5-minute Apgar score <4.
Results Maternal morbidity was higher with operative vaginal/cesarean delivery versus continued expectant management for every hour in the second stage, a difference that was statistically significant at hour 2 (18.4 vs. 14.7%; p <0.01). Overall, 951 (0.88%) deliveries were complicated by a severe neonatal complication. A second stage over 4 hours was associated with an adjusted odds of severe neonatal complication of 2.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–3.34) as compared with women who delivered in the first hour.
Conclusion There is a trade-off between maternal and neonatal morbidity in the second stage of labor. Serious neonatal complications rise throughout, however, there is no time at which maternal morbidity is improved with a cesarean or operative vaginal delivery. Strategies are needed to identify neonates at highest risk of complication for targeted intervention.
Key Points
-
Severe neonatal complications increase with every hour in the second stage.
-
Shortening the second stage is associated with higher maternal complications at every hour.
-
There is a trade-off between maternal and neonatal morbidity in the second stage.
Note
This study was presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Dallas, Texas February 3 to 8, 2020.
Publication History
Received: 27 August 2021
Accepted: 03 June 2022
Accepted Manuscript online:
16 June 2022
Article published online:
12 September 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Changes in cesarean delivery rates by gestational age: United States, 1996-2011. NCHS Data Brief 2013; (124) 1-8
- 2 Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (05) 1181-1193
- 3 Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (03) 179-193
- 4 Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, Sundaram R, Lu Z, Hoffman MK. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (01) 57-67
- 5 Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (04) 357.e1-357.e7
- 6 Grantz KL, Sundaram R, Ma L. et al. Reassessing the duration of the second stage of labor in relation to maternal and neonatal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (02) 345-353
- 7 Zipori Y, Grunwald O, Ginsberg Y, Beloosesky R, Weiner Z. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220 (02) 191.e1-191.e7
- 8 Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (03) 361.e1-361.e6
- 9 Rosenbloom JI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG. et al. New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217 (06) 689.e1-689.e8
- 10 Leveno KJ, Nelson DB, McIntire DD. Second-stage labor: how long is too long?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (04) 484-489
- 11 Gimovsky AC, Levine JT, Pham A, Dunn J, Zhou D, Peaceman AM. Pushing the bounds of second stage in term nulliparas with a predictive model. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2019; 1 (03) 100028
- 12 Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 2007; 176 (04) 455-460
- 13 Joint Commission. Specifications manual for Joint Commission national quality measures. Perinatal Care (PC)-06 version. 2018 B. Accessed May 16, 2019 at: https://manual.jointcommission.org/releases/TJC2018B/MIF0393.html
- 14 Clapp MA, James KE, Bates SV, Kaimal AJ. Patient and hospital factors associated with unexpected newborn complications among term neonates in US hospitals. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (02) e1919498
- 15 Clapp MA, James KE, Bates SV, Kaimal AJ. Unexpected term NICU admissions: a marker of obstetrical care quality?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220 (04) 395.e1-395.e12
- 16 Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM. et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (04) 326.e1-326.e10
- 17 Ausbeck EB, Jennings SF, Champion M. et al. Perinatal outcomes with longer second stage of labor: a risk analysis comparing expectant management to operative intervention. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (12) 1201-1207
- 18 Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (06) 1226-1232