Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2099-6309
Visible-Light-Promoted Click [3+2] Cycloaddition of Aziridine with Alkyne: An Efficient Synthesis of Dihydropyrrolidine
R. K. acknowledges the financial support from Department of Science and Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology, India for the award of DST WOS-A project (ref. no. DST/WOS-A/CS-79/2019 (G)). R.C. is thankful to the DST, India for the award of DST WOS-A project (ref. no. SR/WOS-A/CS-54/2018) and financial support.
Abstract
A photocatalytic [3+2] cycloaddition of aziridines with activated alkynes is reported under visible-light irradiation in the presence of ruthenium catalyst. This chemical transformation provides polysubstituted pyrrolidines in good yields based on the click chemistry philosophy. The reaction successfully represents a primary trial of cyclocarboamination through photocascade catalysis combining energy transfer and redox neutral reactions.
Key words
aziridine - alkyne - dihydropyrrolidine - visible light - click chemistry - photoredox catalysisUsing cycloaddition processes, click chemistry creates carbon–hetero atom bonds in an environmentally friendly manner. It is a broad-based technique that is quick, modular, effective, dependable, and easy to execute that may be utilized for the synthesis of new compounds with required functionalities. In this context, photocatalytic cycloadditions generated by visible light have been effectively used to synthesize a variety of carbo- and heterocyclic compounds.
Many natural compounds and pharmaceuticals with a variety of biological and therapeutic activities contain unsaturated N-heterocycles, such as pyrrole and its derivatives, as common structural motifs (Figure [1]).[1] As a result, they have attracted a lot of interest in material science, medicinal chemistry, and chemical synthesis. Given the significance of this class of chemicals, the synthetic community has been working hard to create extremely effective synthetic methods to obtain these compounds.[2]


Organic chemists have been fascinated by the aziridine ring’s distinctive structure and reactivity for a long time. Expanding aziridine chemistry further, important polysubstituted pyrrolidines can be created via atom-efficient and convergent cycloaddition reaction of aziridines with alkynes via C–C bond and C–N bond cleavage by photoredox catalysis.[3] It can be an atom-efficient and convenient approach to the preparation of useful polysubstituted pyrrolidines.[3]
Several techniques have been reported in the past for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydropyrroles, including the ring-closing metathesis of enamides,[4] cyclization of sulfonamide anions and alkynyl iodonium triflates,[5] ring expansion of imino cyclopropanes and alkenyl aziridines,[6] hydroamination,[7] double N-alkenylation,[8] iodoamidation,[9] isomerization of 3,4-dihydropyrroles,[10] cycloadditions of nitroalkenes to isocyanoesters,[11] reactions of 1-cyano or 1-nitro cyclopropyl ketones with aniline[12] and Ag-catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition of alkynes with aziridines.[13] From the standpoints of synthetic variety and green chemistry, it is crucial to discover effective novel synthetic methods for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydropyrroles despite these well-known techniques. The ring-opening reaction of aziridines by visible-light photocatalysis employing Na2S2O8 as an oxidant was revealed by Xia et al. in 2014.[14] We made the assumption that it could be possible to carry out a [3+2]-cycloaddition reaction of aziridines with alkynes under the hitherto reported conditions based on the visible-light-photocatalytic oxidative quenching cycle mechanism of this reaction. To the best of our knowledge, no method has yet been reported for producing 2,3-dihydropyrroles by visible-light photocatalysis and [3+2] cycloaddition of alkynes with aziridines.
As part of our continuing research interests in visible-light photoredox catalysis,[15] we have developed a novel visible-light-induced [3+2]-cycloaddition reaction of aziridines 1 with alkynes 2 (Scheme [1]). The method provides an efficient route to various polysubstituted pyrroles 3 under very mild reaction conditions (visible-light irradiation, one-pot methodology, and ambient temperature).


a Reaction conditions: 1a (1 mmol), 2a (2 mmol), oxidant (1.5 equiv), PC (2 mol%), blue LED irradiation at r.t. for 4 h under air.
b Determined by GC.
c No light.
d Reaction time 7 h.
e Under N2.
f I2, DDQ, NBS, Na2S2O8, K2S2O8, or PhI(OAc)2.
g PhN2BF4 was used at 5 mol%, 10 mol%, 20 mol% and 50 mol%, respectively.
h Hantzsch ester (1 equiv).
i λ = 427 nm.
We first began our investigation through the formal [3+2]-cycloaddition reaction between N-tosylaziridine (1a) and phenylacetylene (2a) as model substrates with 1.5 equiv of PhN2BF4 under irradiation from a blue LED (3 W, λ = 475.5 nm) in the presence of 2 mol% Ru(bpy)3Cl2·6H2O as a photoredox catalyst in i-PrOH at room temperature (Table [1]). To our satisfaction, we obtained the desired product 3a in 72% yield in 4 h (Table [1], entry 1). Subsequently, control experiments were conducted which established that both the photocatalyst and light were essential for the reaction because in the absence of either of the two, the product was formed in traces (Table [1], entries 2 and 3). The yield of the product did not increase on extending the reaction time to even 7 h (Table [1], entry 4). The yield increased to 80% when the reaction was carried out under nitrogen atmosphere (Table [1], entry 5). The desired product could not be obtained without PhN2BF4, which suggested that an oxidant was essential for the reaction (Table [1], entry 6). Other tested catalysts also promoted the reaction (entries 7 and 8) and the best yield was obtained with Ru(bpy)3(BF4)2 as a photocatalyst (entry 8 vs entries 5 and 7).
The reaction failed when I2, DDQ, NBS, Na2S2O8, K2S2O8, or PhI(OAc)2 were used as the substituted oxidant (entry 9). On using (NH4)2S2O8 as the oxidant, the product was obtained in 61% yield (entry 10).[16] When the concentration of PhN2BF4 was changed to 5 mol%, 10 mol%, 20 mol%, and 50 mol%, the product was obtained in 10%, 16%, 33%, and 72% yield, respectively (entry 11). A small amount of biphenyl was also detected in the reaction mixture. Among the various solvents tested, best yield was obtained in i-PrOH (Table [1], entry 8 vs entries 12–15). When the reaction was performed using lower wavelength light (λ = 427 nm), the yield of the reaction increased (entry 16). However, in the absence of photocatalyst, the product was formed in traces even with lower wavelength light (entry 17).
a Reaction conditions: 1 (1 mmol), 2a (2 mmol), PhN2BF4 (1.5 equiv), Ru(bpy)3(BF4)2 (2 mol%), blue LED (λ = 427 nm) irradiation at r.t. under N2 for 3–4 h in 3 mL i-PrOH.
b Yield of the pure isolated products 3; the proportion of isomers given in parentheses was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
cAll compounds are known in the literature and gave 1H NMR and 13C NMR data in accordance with it.
d regioisomeric ratio determined by GC-MS.
Using the optimum conditions at hand, different arylaziridine and arylalkyne combinations were researched (Tables 2 and 3). The substituents on the aryl ring of the 2-aryl-N-tosylaziridine, such as F, Cl, and Me, generated the cycloaddition products in good yields with high regioselectivity (Table [2, 3b–e]). However, the bromo-substituted starting material gave a slightly lower yield (3f). Both 2-octyl-N-tosylaziridine and N-tosylcyclohexanoaziridine were appropriate for the reaction and gave 3g and 3h, respectively. 2-Methyl-2-phenylaziridine furnished tetrasubstituted cycloadduct 3i with lower yield and regioselectivity. Furthermore, N-nosylaziridine efficiently generated N-Ns-cycloadduct 3j, providing options for N-protection and deprotection.[17] An all-carbon quaternary stereocenter in 3k was successfully installed using 2-methyl-2-phenylaziridine.
Various arylalkynes were also compatible with the developed protocol and produced the target molecules in good to excellent yields (Table [3]). However, dialkylalkyne 2h produced the desired product 3q in very low yields on using 10 equiv of the alkyne (entry 7).
a Reaction conditions: 1a (1 mmol), 2 (2 mmol), PhN2BF4 (1.5 equiv), Ru(bpy)3(BF4)2 (2 mol%), blue LED (λ = 427 nm) irradiation at r.t. under N2 for 3–4 h in 3 mL i-PrOH.
b Yield of the pure isolated products 3; the proportion of isomers given in parentheses was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
c All compounds are known in literature and gave 1H NMR and 13C NMR data in accordance with it.
d 10 equiv.
The regiochemistry of compounds 3a–f and 3l–n was assigned on the basis of a J coupling of 2.9–2.3 Hz between the benzylic and vinylic protons at the a and b positions (Figure [2]). Compounds 3g, 3k, and 3p were assigned by analogy.


Based on literature precedents[14] [15a] [16] and our observations (Table [1], entries 2 and 3), a plausible reaction mechanism is proposed to illustrate the oxidative [3+2]-cycloaddition reaction (Scheme [2]). Initially under visible-light irradiation, the ground state of Ru2+ is changed to excited state (Ru*2+) which is oxidized by PhN2BF4 (4) to produce Ru3+. PhN2BF4 (4) itself is reduced to generate the phenyl radical 5 which undergoes homocoupling to give 6. Meanwhile, aziridine1 is oxidized to generate a nitrogen radical cation 7 by Ru3+, simultaneously reducing itself to the original oxidation level Ru2+. Intermediate 7 is attacked by alkyne 2, to give the ion intermediate 8 via electron exchange and intermediate 8 finally undergoes intramolecular cyclization and HAT with solvent leading to the formation of dihydropyrrolidine 3.


In summary, we have developed a visible-light-triggered [3+2]-cycloaddition reaction of aziridines with alkynes under simple and mild reaction conditions with a wide range of substrates.[18] The reaction is scalable, uses low catalyst loadings, is highly regioselective, and provides a variety of polysubstituted dihydropyrroles in moderate to high yields. Visible light as a clean energy source makes this route a good substitute to the existing synthetic protocols.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
We sincerely thank SAIF, Punjab University, Chandigarh for providing spectroscopic facilities.
-
References and Notes
- 1a Smalley RK. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, Vol. 7. Katritzky AR, Rees CW. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1984: 491-546
- 1b Leimgruber W, Stefanovic V, Schenker F, Karr A, Berger J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965; 87: 5791
- 1c Zaman L, Arakawa O, Shimosu A, Onoue Y, Nishio S, Shida Y, Noguchi T. Toxicon 1997; 35: 205
- 1d Komoda T, Sugiyama Y, Abe N, Imachi M, Hirota H, Hirota A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003; 44: 1659
- 1e Beutler JA, Brubaker AN. Drugs Future 1987; 12: 957
- 1f Brown DG, Bernstein PR, Wu Y, Urbanek RA, Becker CW, Throner SR, Dembofsky BT, Steelman GB, Lazor LA, Scott CW, Wood MW, Wesolowski SS, Nugiel DA, Koch S, Yu J, Pivonka DE, Li S, Thompson C, Zacco A, Elmore CS, Schroeder P, Liu J.-W, Hurley CA, Ward S, Hunt HJ, Williams K, McLaughlin J, Hoesch V, Sydserff S, Maier D, Aharony D. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013; 4: 46
- 2a Evans PA, Inglesby PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 3635
- 2b Jiang H, He J, Liu T, Yu J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 2055
- 2c Liu R, Winston-Mcpherson GN, Yang Z.-Y, Zhou X, Song W, Guzei IA, Xu X, Tang W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 8201
- 2d Shaw MH, Melikhova EY, Kloer DP, Whittingham WG, Bower JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 4992
- 2e Shaw MH, McCreanor NG, Whittingham WG, Bower JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 463
- 2f Nicolle SM, Lewis W, Hayes CJ, Moody C. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 3749
- 2g Liu K, Zhu C, Min J, Peng S, Xu G, Sun J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 12962
- 2h Knight JG, Tchabanenko K, Stoker PA, Harwood SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 6261
- 2i Ohmatsu K, Imagawa N, Ooi T. Nat. Chem. 2014; 6: 47
- 2j Yang J.-M, Zhu C.-Z, Tang X.-Y, Shi M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5142
- 2k Nakamura I, Okamoto M, Sato Y, Terada M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 10816
- 2l Zhou M.-B, Song R.-J, Wang C.-Y, Li J.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 10805
- 2m Yang Y, Zhou M.-B, Ouyang X.-H, Pi R, Song R.-J, Li J.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 6595
- 2n Wender PA, Pedersen TM, Scanio MJ. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 15154
- 2o Shi Z, Grohmann C, Glorius F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 5393
- 2p Li T, Xu F, Li X, Wang C, Wan B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 2861
- 2q Nakamura I, Yamamoto Y. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 2127
- 2r Han M.-Y, Jia J.-Y, Wang W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 784
- 3 Feng J-J, Zhang J. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 6651
- 4 Kinderman SS, van Maarseveen JH, Schoemaker HE, Hiemstra H, Rutjes FP. J. T. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 2045
- 5 Feldman KS, Bruendl MM, Schildknegt K, Bohnstedt AC. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 5440
- 6a Jacoby D, Celerier JP, Haviari G, Petit H, Lhommet G. Synthesis 1992; 884
- 6b Zhu W, Cai G, Ma D. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5545
- 7a Wolf LB, Tjen KC. M. F, Rutjes FP. J. T, Hiemstra H, Schoemaker HE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 5081
- 7b Busacca CA, Dong Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996; 37: 3947
- 7c Yin Y, Ma W, Chai Z, Zhao G. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 5731
- 7d Ma S, Yu F, Li J, Gao W. Chem. Eur. J. 2007; 13: 247
- 8 Zhou X, Zhang H, Yuan J, Mai L, Li Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 7236
- 9a Ding C.-H, Dai L.-X, Hou X.-L. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 9586
- 9b Knight DW, Redfern AL, Gilmore J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002; 622
- 10 Sonesson C, Hallberg A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995; 36: 4505
- 11a Saegusa T, Ito Y, Kinoshita H, Tomita S. J. Org. Chem. 1971; 36: 3316
- 11b Schöllkopf U, Hantke K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1973; 1571
- 11c Guo C, Xue M.-X, Zhu M.-K, Gong L.-Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 3414
- 12 Wurz RP, Charette AB. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 2313
- 13 Strand D, Wender PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 7528
- 14 Sun H, Yang C, Lin R, Xia W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014; 356: 2775
- 15a Kapoor R, Tripathi S, Singh SN, Keshari T, Yadav LD. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017; 58: 3814
- 15b Kapoor R, Chawla R, Yadav LD. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019; 60: 805
- 15c Chawla R, Yadav LD. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 4761
- 15d Kapoor R, Chawla R, Yadav LD. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020; 61: 152505
- 16 Ye Q, Xu X, Cheng D, Guan B, Ye H, Li X. ARKIVOC 2017; (v): 314
- 17 Fukuyama T, Jow C.-K, Cheung M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995; 36: 6373
- 18 General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2,3-Dihydropyrroles 3 To a stirred solution of aziridine (1 mmol) and alkyne (2 mmol) in isopropyl alcohol (3 mL) was added PhN2BF4 (1.5 equiv) and Ru(bpy)3(BF4)2 photocatalyst (2 mol%) at room temperature under visible-light irradiation (blue LED, 3 W, λ = 427 nm). The reaction typically turned yellow or orange/brownish as the reaction progressed. Upon complete consumption of aziridine (TLC control), the reaction was added onto a short SiO2 flash column (flushed with Et3N (5%) doped eluent) or an Al2O3 (neutral) flash column and eluted with 6.25% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether. Product-containing fractions were concentrated under reduced pressure to leave the corresponding dihydropyrroles 3. Characterization Data of Representative Compounds 3 3,5-Diphenyl-1-tosyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrole (3a) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70–7.65 (m, 2 H), 7.60–7.50 (m, 2 H), 7.49–7.44 (m, 3 H), 7.26–7.21 (m, 2 H), 7.19–7.14 (m, 3 H), 6.79–6.74 (m, 2 H), 5.32 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (dd, J = 11.9, 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.83 (dd, J = 11.9, 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (ddd, J = 10.0, 8.0, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.45 (s, 3 H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 144.9, 142.9, 141.4, 133.4, 132.6, 129.6, 128.9, 128.5, 128.01, 128.0, 127.6, 127.1, 125.9, 120.0, 59.6, 46.9, 21.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C23H21NO2S + Na+]: 398.1191; found: 398.1196. 3-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-phenyl-1-tosyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrole (3f) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.69–7.66 (m, 2 H), 7.42–7.30 (m, 5 H), 7.29–7.21 (m, 2 H), 7.29–7.20 (m, 2 H), 6.76–6.65 (m, 2 H), 5.39 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.28 (dd, J = 12.6, 9.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.82 (dd, J = 12.6, 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (ddd, J = 9.9, 7.2, 2.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.32 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 146.4, 144.0, 142.6, 133.9, 132.6, 131.9, 129.2, 130.1, 129.0, 128.6, 128.0, 127.3, 120.9, 118.1, 59.9, 45.2, 21.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C23H20NO2SBr + Na+]: 476.0296; found: 476.0290. 3-Methyl-3,5-diphenyl-1-tosyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrole (3k) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.63–7.56 (m, 2 H), 7.42–7.35 (m, 3 H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 2 H), 7.16–7.08 (m, 3 H), 7.04 (dd, J = 8.0, 0.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.98–6.92 (m, 2 H), 5.40 (s, 1 H), 4.16 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.05 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.34 (s, 3 H), 2.24 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.6, 143.7, 143.5, 133.2, 132.7, 129.2, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 127.8, 127.7, 125.9, 125.5, 123.7, 65.6, 48.2, 29.0, 21.5. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C24H23NO2S + Na+]: 412.1347; found: 412.1345.
Selected recent reports on the synthesis of pyrrole and azepine derivatives:
Azepines:
For reviews, see:
Corresponding Authors
Publication History
Received: 20 February 2023
Accepted after revision: 24 May 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 May 2023
Article published online:
26 June 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Smalley RK. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, Vol. 7. Katritzky AR, Rees CW. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1984: 491-546
- 1b Leimgruber W, Stefanovic V, Schenker F, Karr A, Berger J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965; 87: 5791
- 1c Zaman L, Arakawa O, Shimosu A, Onoue Y, Nishio S, Shida Y, Noguchi T. Toxicon 1997; 35: 205
- 1d Komoda T, Sugiyama Y, Abe N, Imachi M, Hirota H, Hirota A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003; 44: 1659
- 1e Beutler JA, Brubaker AN. Drugs Future 1987; 12: 957
- 1f Brown DG, Bernstein PR, Wu Y, Urbanek RA, Becker CW, Throner SR, Dembofsky BT, Steelman GB, Lazor LA, Scott CW, Wood MW, Wesolowski SS, Nugiel DA, Koch S, Yu J, Pivonka DE, Li S, Thompson C, Zacco A, Elmore CS, Schroeder P, Liu J.-W, Hurley CA, Ward S, Hunt HJ, Williams K, McLaughlin J, Hoesch V, Sydserff S, Maier D, Aharony D. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013; 4: 46
- 2a Evans PA, Inglesby PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 3635
- 2b Jiang H, He J, Liu T, Yu J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 2055
- 2c Liu R, Winston-Mcpherson GN, Yang Z.-Y, Zhou X, Song W, Guzei IA, Xu X, Tang W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 8201
- 2d Shaw MH, Melikhova EY, Kloer DP, Whittingham WG, Bower JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 4992
- 2e Shaw MH, McCreanor NG, Whittingham WG, Bower JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 463
- 2f Nicolle SM, Lewis W, Hayes CJ, Moody C. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 3749
- 2g Liu K, Zhu C, Min J, Peng S, Xu G, Sun J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 12962
- 2h Knight JG, Tchabanenko K, Stoker PA, Harwood SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 6261
- 2i Ohmatsu K, Imagawa N, Ooi T. Nat. Chem. 2014; 6: 47
- 2j Yang J.-M, Zhu C.-Z, Tang X.-Y, Shi M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5142
- 2k Nakamura I, Okamoto M, Sato Y, Terada M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 10816
- 2l Zhou M.-B, Song R.-J, Wang C.-Y, Li J.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 10805
- 2m Yang Y, Zhou M.-B, Ouyang X.-H, Pi R, Song R.-J, Li J.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 6595
- 2n Wender PA, Pedersen TM, Scanio MJ. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 15154
- 2o Shi Z, Grohmann C, Glorius F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 5393
- 2p Li T, Xu F, Li X, Wang C, Wan B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 2861
- 2q Nakamura I, Yamamoto Y. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 2127
- 2r Han M.-Y, Jia J.-Y, Wang W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 784
- 3 Feng J-J, Zhang J. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 6651
- 4 Kinderman SS, van Maarseveen JH, Schoemaker HE, Hiemstra H, Rutjes FP. J. T. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 2045
- 5 Feldman KS, Bruendl MM, Schildknegt K, Bohnstedt AC. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 5440
- 6a Jacoby D, Celerier JP, Haviari G, Petit H, Lhommet G. Synthesis 1992; 884
- 6b Zhu W, Cai G, Ma D. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5545
- 7a Wolf LB, Tjen KC. M. F, Rutjes FP. J. T, Hiemstra H, Schoemaker HE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 5081
- 7b Busacca CA, Dong Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996; 37: 3947
- 7c Yin Y, Ma W, Chai Z, Zhao G. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 5731
- 7d Ma S, Yu F, Li J, Gao W. Chem. Eur. J. 2007; 13: 247
- 8 Zhou X, Zhang H, Yuan J, Mai L, Li Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 7236
- 9a Ding C.-H, Dai L.-X, Hou X.-L. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 9586
- 9b Knight DW, Redfern AL, Gilmore J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002; 622
- 10 Sonesson C, Hallberg A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995; 36: 4505
- 11a Saegusa T, Ito Y, Kinoshita H, Tomita S. J. Org. Chem. 1971; 36: 3316
- 11b Schöllkopf U, Hantke K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1973; 1571
- 11c Guo C, Xue M.-X, Zhu M.-K, Gong L.-Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 3414
- 12 Wurz RP, Charette AB. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 2313
- 13 Strand D, Wender PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 7528
- 14 Sun H, Yang C, Lin R, Xia W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014; 356: 2775
- 15a Kapoor R, Tripathi S, Singh SN, Keshari T, Yadav LD. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017; 58: 3814
- 15b Kapoor R, Chawla R, Yadav LD. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019; 60: 805
- 15c Chawla R, Yadav LD. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 4761
- 15d Kapoor R, Chawla R, Yadav LD. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020; 61: 152505
- 16 Ye Q, Xu X, Cheng D, Guan B, Ye H, Li X. ARKIVOC 2017; (v): 314
- 17 Fukuyama T, Jow C.-K, Cheung M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995; 36: 6373
- 18 General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2,3-Dihydropyrroles 3 To a stirred solution of aziridine (1 mmol) and alkyne (2 mmol) in isopropyl alcohol (3 mL) was added PhN2BF4 (1.5 equiv) and Ru(bpy)3(BF4)2 photocatalyst (2 mol%) at room temperature under visible-light irradiation (blue LED, 3 W, λ = 427 nm). The reaction typically turned yellow or orange/brownish as the reaction progressed. Upon complete consumption of aziridine (TLC control), the reaction was added onto a short SiO2 flash column (flushed with Et3N (5%) doped eluent) or an Al2O3 (neutral) flash column and eluted with 6.25% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether. Product-containing fractions were concentrated under reduced pressure to leave the corresponding dihydropyrroles 3. Characterization Data of Representative Compounds 3 3,5-Diphenyl-1-tosyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrole (3a) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70–7.65 (m, 2 H), 7.60–7.50 (m, 2 H), 7.49–7.44 (m, 3 H), 7.26–7.21 (m, 2 H), 7.19–7.14 (m, 3 H), 6.79–6.74 (m, 2 H), 5.32 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (dd, J = 11.9, 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.83 (dd, J = 11.9, 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (ddd, J = 10.0, 8.0, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.45 (s, 3 H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 144.9, 142.9, 141.4, 133.4, 132.6, 129.6, 128.9, 128.5, 128.01, 128.0, 127.6, 127.1, 125.9, 120.0, 59.6, 46.9, 21.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C23H21NO2S + Na+]: 398.1191; found: 398.1196. 3-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-phenyl-1-tosyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrole (3f) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.69–7.66 (m, 2 H), 7.42–7.30 (m, 5 H), 7.29–7.21 (m, 2 H), 7.29–7.20 (m, 2 H), 6.76–6.65 (m, 2 H), 5.39 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.28 (dd, J = 12.6, 9.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.82 (dd, J = 12.6, 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (ddd, J = 9.9, 7.2, 2.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.32 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 146.4, 144.0, 142.6, 133.9, 132.6, 131.9, 129.2, 130.1, 129.0, 128.6, 128.0, 127.3, 120.9, 118.1, 59.9, 45.2, 21.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C23H20NO2SBr + Na+]: 476.0296; found: 476.0290. 3-Methyl-3,5-diphenyl-1-tosyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrole (3k) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.63–7.56 (m, 2 H), 7.42–7.35 (m, 3 H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 2 H), 7.16–7.08 (m, 3 H), 7.04 (dd, J = 8.0, 0.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.98–6.92 (m, 2 H), 5.40 (s, 1 H), 4.16 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.05 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.34 (s, 3 H), 2.24 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.6, 143.7, 143.5, 133.2, 132.7, 129.2, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 127.8, 127.7, 125.9, 125.5, 123.7, 65.6, 48.2, 29.0, 21.5. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C24H23NO2S + Na+]: 412.1347; found: 412.1345.
Selected recent reports on the synthesis of pyrrole and azepine derivatives:
Azepines:
For reviews, see:










