Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2285-6166
Original Article

Trial of Labor versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Individuals with Morbid Obesity after Previous Cesarean Delivery

1   Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
,
Tawany C. Almeida
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
,
George Saade
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
,
Tetsuya Kawakita
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to compare adverse neonatal outcomes associated with the trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) at term in pregnancies according to maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) and the presence of previous vaginal delivery (VD).

Study Design This was a repeated cross-sectional analysis of individuals with singleton, cephalic, and term deliveries with a history of one or two cesarean deliveries in the Linked Birth/Infant Death data from 2011 to 2020. Outcomes were examined according to the BMI category including BMI <30, 30 to 39.9, and 40 to 69.9 kg/m2. The primary outcome was a composite neonatal outcome, defined as any presence of neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, assisted ventilation, surfactant therapy, or seizures. Outcomes were compared between TOLAC and elective repeat cesarean delivery (eRCD) after stratifying by BMI category and previous VD. Log-binomial regression was performed to obtain adjusted relative risk (aRR) with 99% confidence intervals, controlling for covariates.

Results Of 4,055,440 individuals, 2,627,131 had BMI <30 kg/m2, 1,108,278 had BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2, and 320,031 had BMI 40 to 69.9 kg/m2. In individuals with no previous VD, VD rates after TOLAC were 66.7, 57.2, and 48.1%, respectively. In individuals with previous VD, VD rates after TOLAC were 81.4, 74.7, and 67.3%, respectively. In individuals without previous VD, compared with those who had an eRCD, those who had TOLAC were more likely to experience composite neonatal outcomes in individuals with BMI < 30 kg/m2 (5.0 vs. 6.5%; aRR 1.33 [1.30–1.36]), BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2 (6.1 vs. 7.8%; aRR 1.29 [1.24–1.34]), and BMI 40 to 69.9 kg/m2 (8.2 vs. 9.0%; aRR 1.15 [1.07–1.23]). In individuals with previous VD, there was no difference in the composite neonatal outcomes in BMI < 30 kg/m2 (6.2 vs. 5.8%; aRR 0.98 [0.96–1.00]), BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2 (7.4 vs. 7.1%; aRR 0.99 [0.95–1.02]), and BMI 40 to 69.9 kg/m2 (9.4 vs. 8.7%; aRR 0.96 [0.91–1.02]).

Conclusion TOLAC among obese individuals could be offered in selected cases.

Key Points

  • TOLAC among obese individuals could be offered selectively, despite their reduced likelihood of attempting or succeeding at it.

  • Higher BMI individuals show decreased rates of both attempting and achieving successful TOLAC.

  • Despite these trends, attempting TOLAC after a previous vaginal delivery does not heighten neonatal complications.

Note

This paper will be presented in part as a poster at the SMFM 2024 Pregnancy Meeting, National Harbor, MD, from February 10–14, 2024.




Publication History

Received: 11 February 2024

Accepted: 11 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
12 March 2024

Article published online:
04 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 James WP. WHO recognition of the global obesity epidemic. Int J Obes 2008; 32 (Suppl. 07) S120-S126
  • 2 Jude G, Fain A, Raker C. et al. The association between trial of labor after cesarean in obese patients and adverse maternal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023
  • 3 Stüber TN, Künzel EC, Zollner U, Rehn M, Wöckel A, Hönig A. Prevalence and associated risk factors for obesity during pregnancy over time. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75 (09) 923-928
  • 4 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (02) e110-e127
  • 5 Carroll Sr CS, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Morrison JC. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (06) 1516-1520 , discussion 1520–1522
  • 6 Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Carroll CS, Barrilleaux PS, Scardo JA, Martin Jr JN. Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185 (02) 349-354
  • 7 Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail MA. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184 (07) 1365-1371 , discussion 1371–1373
  • 8 Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (25) 2581-2589
  • 9 Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB. et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (05) 1656-1662
  • 10 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guide to the 2021 Natality Public Use File. 2022 . Accessed March 23, 2024 at: https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/UserGuide2021.pdf
  • 11 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System Birth Data. Accessed December 22, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/births.htm
  • 12 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System. Linked Birth and Infant Death Data. . Accessed March 23, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/linked-birth.htm
  • 13 Vaajala M, Liukkonen R, Ponkilainen V, Kekki M, Mattila VM, Kuitunen I. Delivery mode and fetal outcome in attempted vaginal deliveries after previous cesarean section: a nationwide register-based cohort study in Finland. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 36 (01) 2198062
  • 14 Lehmann S, Baghestan E, Børdahl PE, Irgens LM, Rasmussen S. Perinatal outcome in births after a previous cesarean section at high trial of labor rates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98 (01) 117-126
  • 15 Litwin CE, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Zakhari A, Abenhaim HA. Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after caesarean delivery: a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (16) 2148-2154
  • 16 Yao R, Crimmins SD, Contag SA, Kopelman JN, Goetzinger KR. Adverse perinatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean section at term in pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 32 (08) 1256-1261
  • 17 Grobman WA, Sandoval G, Rice MM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225 (06) 664.e1-664.e7
  • 18 Cahill AG, Macones GA. Vital considerations for the use of vital statistics in obstetrical research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194 (04) 909-910
  • 19 Dombrowski M, Illuzzi JL, Reddy UM. et al. Trial of labor after two prior cesarean deliveries: patient and hospital characteristics and birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (01) 109-117
  • 20 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How Does CDC Identify Severe Maternal Morbidity?. December 26, 2019. Accessed at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/smm/severe-morbidity-ICD.htm