Am J Perinatol 2025; 42(10): 1295-1303
DOI: 10.1055/a-2486-8994
Original Article

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Follow-up for Neonates Requiring Neurocritical Care

Isabella Eiler
1   Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Lakeisha Boyd
2   Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Melissa Klitzman
3   Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Bittu Majmudar-Sheth
4   Department of Pediatric Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Beatrice M. Stefanescu
3   Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
› Author Affiliations

Funding This study was supported by a Morris Green Physician Scientist Development Program grant from the Indiana University School of Medicine.The content of the manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Morris Green Physician Scientist Development Program at Indiana University.
Preview

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed exploration of associations of social determinants of health (SDH) with attrition rates of neurocritical care graduates at follow-up.

Study Design

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the attrition rates of an infant's first appointment scheduled with the NeuroNICU follow-up clinic in correlation with SDH.

Results

The “No Show” group was more likely to have unemployed (p = 0.014), black or multiracial mothers (p = 0.005), public insurance (p < 0.001), lower gestational age (p < 0.001), live further from the clinic (0.011), and a lower zip code-associated income (p = 0.008). After controlling for driving time, race, and education, infants who had private insurance were 2.268 times more likely to attend their follow-up visit when compared with infants who had public insurance (p = 0.014).

Conclusion

A significant SDH-related difference existed among the “Show” and “No Show” groups. Identifying these factors during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission can facilitate targeted support for families while inpatient and promote improved outpatient follow-up.

Key Points

  • Follow-up for neonates requiring neurocritical care is strongly influenced by social determinants.

  • Standardized SDH screening in NICUs, identifying high-risk infants for attrition, is used by few.

  • Factors influencing disparities in the utilization of follow-up programs require further study.

  • Equity-based attrition prevention interventions could improve outcomes and reduce costs.

Ethical Approval

This was a research-expedited study approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 30 July 2024

Accepted: 25 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 November 2024

Article published online:
24 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA