Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2025; 35(02): 141-146
DOI: 10.1055/a-2514-7244
Original Article

Anorectal Malformation with Rectoperineal Fistula in Males Treated with a Posterior Rectal Advancement Anoplasty: Report of Early Outcomes

Thomas O. Xu 
1   Department of Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Inbal Samuk
2   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Tel Aviv, Israel
,
Christina Feng
3   Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Richard J. Wood
4   Center for Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Andrea Badillo
1   Department of Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Marc A. Levitt
3   Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective A novel modification of the cutback procedure, a posterior rectal advancement anoplasty (PRAA) for select male patients with an anorectal malformation and a rectoperineal fistula was recently described, which incised only within the limits of the sphincteric ellipse and eliminated an anterior rectal dissection and thus avoiding any possibility of a urethral injury. This report provides longer-term postoperative outcomes after PRAA.

Method A retrospective, single-institution study was performed examining male patients with a rectoperineal fistula between January 2020 and December 2023. PRAA was done only if the rectoperineal fistula was located within the anterior extent of the sphincteric ellipse, which was true for all patients encountered during this study period. We assessed postoperative outcomes, length of stay, time to first feeding, and early stooling patterns.

Results Eighteen patients underwent PRAA at a median age of 5.4 months (range 1 day–8 months) with a median follow-up of 14 months (range 4–40). Seven patients (39%) were repaired within the first month of life. Thirteen (72%) were repaired primarily and five (28%) had a diverting ostomy placed before referral. There were no instances of wound dehiscence, rectal prolapse, or urethral injury. Two (11%) patients developed an anal stricture requiring dilation or Heineke–Mikulicz anoplasty. All patients resumed feeds on postoperative day one. Median discharge was on postoperative day one (range 1–6). Fifteen (83%) were utilizing laxatives at their most recent follow-up.

Conclusion The PRAA avoids any potential urethral injury or perineal dehiscence has a low rate of anal stenosis (11%) and appears to be applicable to all male patients with a rectoperineal fistula. The technique allows for early return to diet and discharge and can be safely done in the neonatal period or in a delayed fashion without the need for a stoma.

Level of Evidence Level III.

Keywords

anorectal malformations - perineal fistula - operative technique - posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Meeting Presentation

Oral presentation at the European Union Pediatric Surgery Association in June 2024.


Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization and design: T.X., M.L., A.B., R.W., and C.F.


Data collection, data analysis, and original manuscript preparation: T.X.


Editing and writing: T.X., R.H., I.S., C.F., E.T., R.W., A.B., and M.L.


Supervision: M.L.


Financial Disclosures

None.




Publication History

Received: 18 October 2024

Accepted: 10 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
13 January 2025

Article published online:
24 March 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Minneci PC, Kabre RS, Mak GZ. et al. Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium. Screening practices and associated anomalies in infants with anorectal malformations: results from the midwest pediatric surgery consortium. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (06) 1163-1167
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Marenco CW, Rice-Townsend S, Rollins M. et al. PCPLC. 30-day postoperative outcomes of neonatal versus delayed anoplasty for perineal and vestibular fistulas. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56 (08) 1454-1458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Misra D, Chana J, Drake DP, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Operative trauma to the genitourinary tract in the treatment of anorectal malformations: 15 years' experience. Urology 1996; 47 (04) 559-562
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Chan KWE, Lee KH, Wong HY. et al. Outcome of patients after single-stage repair of perineal fistula without colostomy according to the Krickenbeck classification. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (08) 1237-1241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Halleran DR, Coyle D, Kulaylat AN. et al. The cutback revisited - the posterior rectal advancement anoplasty for certain anorectal malformations with rectoperineal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57 (09) 85-88
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Browne D. Some congenital deformities of the rectum, anus, vagina and urethra. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1951; 8 (03) 173-192
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nixon H. Operative management of low anomalies in the female. In: Stephens F, Smith E, Paul N Alan R. eds. Anorectal Malformations in Children. New York, NY: Liss Inc; 1988: 309-309
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pakarinen MP, Rintala RJ. Management and outcome of low anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26 (11) 1057-1063
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hendren WH. Constipation caused by anterior location of the anus and its surgical correction. J Pediatr Surg 1978; 13 (06) 505-512
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Leape LL, Ramenofsky ML. Anterior ectopic anus: a common cause of constipation in children. J Pediatr Surg 1978; 13 (6D): 627-630
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Smith EI, Tunell WP, Williams GR. A clinical evaluation of the surgical treatment of anorectal malformations (imperforate anus). Ann Surg 1978; 187 (06) 583-592
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Coyle D. et al. Posterior Rectal Advancement Anoplasty. Accessed 2024 at: www.expertsinsurgery.com https://www.expertsinsurgery.com/programs/posterior-rectal-advancement-anoplasty?category_id=49506
    PubMed
  • 13 Ahmad H, Skeritt C, Halleran DR. et al. Are routine postoperative dilations necessary after primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty? a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56 (08) 1449-1453
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bokova E, Svetanoff WJ, Lopez JJ, Levitt MA, Rentea RM. State of the art bowel management for pediatric colorectal problems: anorectal malformations. Children (Basel) 2023; 10 (05) children10050846
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hong AR, Acuña MF, Peña A, Chaves L, Rodriguez G. Urologic injuries associated with repair of anorectal malformations in male patients. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (03) 339-344
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mickelson JJ, MacNeily AE, Blair GK. The posterior urethra in anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (03) 585-587
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Tyraskis A, El-Sayed J, Tiusaba L. et al. Posterior sagittal approach provides optimal exposure for urethral reconstruction in children with a history of anorectal malformations. Urology 2024; 183: 192-198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Tofft L, Salö M, Arnbjörnsson E, Stenström P. Wound dehiscence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in children with anorectal malformations. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018: 2930783
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Elekiabi O. Risk factors for wound dehiscence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in children with anorectal anomalies. Zagazig Univ Med J 2023; 29: 93-96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Levitt MA, Peña A. Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005; 17 (03) 394-401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Knaus ME, Westgarth-Taylor C, Gasior AC. et al. A modification of the anoplasty technique during a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and anorectal vaginal urethroplasty closure: the para-U-stitch to prevent wound dehiscence. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2024; 34 (03) 222-227
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kurdi M, Moukhtar A, Elkholy M, Alwassia H, Bamehriz M, Khirallah MG. Delayed vs. early enteral feeding after repair of congenital recto-vestibular fistula: The effect on perineal wound healing. Front Pediatr 2023; 10: 994249
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Lai K, Hargis-Villanueva A, Velazco CS. et al. Early postoperative feeding in single-stage repair of anorectal malformation with vestibular or perineal fistula is not associated with increased wound complications. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58 (03) 467-470
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hofmeester MJ, Draaisma JM, Versteegh HP, Huibregtse EC, van Rooij IA, de Blaauw I. Perioperative nutritional management in congenital perineal and vestibular fistulas: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2015; 25 (05) 389-396
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Divarci E, Ergun O. General complications after surgery for anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 2020; 36 (04) 431-445
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar