Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2516-2292
Ambulation during Neuraxial Analgesia in Obese Patients: A Pilot Study
Authors
Funding None.

Abstract
Objective Prior studies have yielded mixed results regarding ambulation with neuraxial analgesia and labor outcomes, and studies did not include a significant obese population. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of ambulation with optimized neuraxial analgesia in laboring nulliparous obese patients.
Study Design This was a pilot study at the University of Chicago (approval no.: IRB 19-1600, CT NCT04504682). Inclusion criteria were delivery BMI of ≥35 kg/m2, nulliparity, and term gestation. Contraindications to ambulation or vaginal delivery conferred ineligibility. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia was initiated per our institution's policy. Following epidural catheter placement, serial blood pressure measurements and motor assessments including a straight leg test and a step stool test were completed per safety protocol. Patients who passed these assessments were enrolled. Patients were encouraged to ambulate for 20 minutes every hour while on fetal and uterine telemetry. Ambulation was discouraged after complete dilation. Demographics and delivery outcomes were collected. Our primary objective was to evaluate feasibility through acceptability, and safety via the number of falls, and percentage of patients with any ambulation. The study was closed early due to enrollment difficulties and in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results A total of 105 patients were identified for the trial: 20 were ineligible for the study, 20 could not be approached, and 40 declined study participation, leaving 25 patients who consented. Of those 25, 14 completed the study. Out of 14 participants, 11 were ambulated. The average BMI of these participants was 43 kg/m2. No patients fell during the trial.
Conclusion A pilot trial of ambulation during neuraxial analgesia among an obese nulliparous population demonstrated no safety concerns, but with concern regarding feasibility as there was low acceptance.
Key Points
-
Pilot trial of ambulation with neuraxial analgesia among obese patients had limited enrollment.
-
Trial of ambulation with epidural among obese nulliparous patients demonstrated no safety concerns.
-
Further studies are needed for efficacy.
Note
These findings were presented as a poster presentation at the Central Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology meeting in Nashville, Tennessee in 2023.
Publication History
Received: 26 November 2024
Accepted: 13 January 2025
Article published online:
10 February 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103 (03) 452-456
- 2 Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013 (10) CD003934
- 3 Collis RE, Harding SA, Morgan BM. Effect of maternal ambulation on labour with low-dose combined spinal-epidural analgesia. Anaesthesia 1999; 54 (06) 535-539
- 4 Vallejo MC, Firestone LL, Mandell GL, Jaime F, Makishima S, Ramanathan S. Effect of epidural analgesia with ambulation on labor duration. Anesthesiology 2001; 95 (04) 857-861
- 5 Karraz MA. Ambulatory epidural anesthesia and the duration of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 80 (02) 117-122
- 6 Flynn AM, Kelly J, Hollins G, Lynch PF. Ambulation in labour. BMJ 1978; 2 (6137) 591-593