Download PDF
J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2596-5573
Scientific Article

Corrective Osteotomy after Gradual Lengthening of the Forearm in Children/Adolescents

Soo Min Cha   *
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Regional Rheumatoid and Degenerative Arthritis Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
,
Hyun Dae Shin   *
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul-Hyun Hospital, Sejong, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was supported by the research fund of Chungnam National University, 2024.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose

We experienced a few unpredictable or unintentional outcomes after gradual lengthening (GL) through distractive osteogenesis (DO) in several etiologies. For deformed forearm bones, we performed an additional delayed corrective osteotomy (DCO). Here, we report the outcomes of two groups according to whether DCO was performed or not, due to unexpected outcomes.

Materials and Methods

Among children/adolescents treated with GL between 2000 and 2015, we further inspected patients who had unpredictable or unintentional outcomes after GL (Group 1). The patients with satisfactory outcomes were designated as Group 2. Basic demographic data, radiologic findings, and clinical status were evaluated at the final follow-up.

Results

Among 33 patients, 4 patients (12%) with unexpected outcomes were classified as Group 1 (5 lengthenings), and the other 29 patients were classified as Group 2. In comparison of parameters through DO, the mean latent periods, external fixator index, lengthened amount, and healing index were 6.20/6.28 days, 36.24/33.30 days/cm, 26.60/22.31 mm, and 46.40/43.34 days/cm, in Groups 1/2, respectively, without statistical significance. In DCO for 3 patients, the mean age at DCO was 13.7 years, and the mean time since GL was 35.7 months. At final follow-up, the mean bowing angle, distances between the dorsal surfaces of the radius and ulna, and ulnar variances were 4.30/13.79 degrees, 1.73/1.76 mm, and −1.00/− 0.24 mm, in Groups 1/2, respectively, without statistical significance except for the bowing angle. The final ranges of motion arcs were at least good levels without statistical significance in both groups. Additionally, the final visual analog scale (VAS) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores were all satisfactory, at 0.75 and 1.80/0.48 and 1.05 in Groups 1/2, respectively.

Conclusion

GL of the forearm has been acknowledged as a useful option in several etiologies presenting with a malformed skeleton. Additionally, for uncommon and unpredictable outcomes after GL, a DCO would be a recommended solution. After the DCO, final outcomes are expected to be as satisfactory as the initial predicted outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic level IV.

Keywords

hereditary multiple exostosis - hypoplasia - Monteggia lesion - lengthening - corrective osteotomy

Ethical Approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chungnam National University Hospital (IRB No. 2020–12–021).


Patient's Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. There is NO information (names, initials, hospital identification numbers or photographs) in the submitted manuscript that can be used to identify patients.


* Both are co-first authors.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 31 January 2025

Accepted: 28 April 2025

Article published online:
20 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Masada K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawai H, Kawabata H, Noguchi K, Ono K. Operations for forearm deformity caused by multiple osteochondromas. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71 (01) 24-29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Baghdadi S, Arabi H, Farhoud A, Moharrami A, Baghdadi T. Clinical and functional outcomes of ulnar lengthening in the treatment of Masada type i forearm deformities in hereditary multiple osteochondromas. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (09) 876.e1-876.e7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Dukan R, Le Hanneur M, Pannier S, Fitoussi F. Use of an external fixator during one-step surgical management of missed chronic Monteggia injuries. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108 (01) 102963
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Eamsobhana P, Chalayon O, Kaewpornsawan K, Ariyawatkul T. Missed Monteggia fracture dislocations treated by open reduction of the radial head. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B (08) 1117-1124
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cha SM, Shin HD, Jeon JH. Long-term results of Galeazzi-equivalent injuries in adolescents–open reduction and internal fixation of the ulna. J Pediatr Orthop B 2016; 25 (02) 174-182
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Page WT, Szabo RM. Distraction osteogenesis for correction of distal radius deformity after physeal arrest. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (04) 617-626
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Akita S, Murase T, Yonenobu K, Shimada K, Masada K, Yoshikawa H. Long-term results of surgery for forearm deformities in patients with multiple cartilaginous exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (09) 1993-1999
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Li Y, Han B, Tang J, Chen M, Wang Z. Identification of risk factors affecting bone formation in gradual ulnar lengthening in children with hereditary multiple exostoses: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (05) e14280
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Feldman DS, Rand TJ, Deszczynski J, Albrewczynski T, Paley D, Huser AJ. Prediction of radial head subluxation and dislocation in patients with multiple hereditary exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103: 2207-2214
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Zheng C, Han H, Cao Y. Older age and multi-joint external fixator are two risk factors of complications in ulnar lengthening in children with hereditary multiple exostosis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15 (01) 555
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Jo AR, Jung ST, Kim MS, Oh CS, Min BJ. An evaluation of forearm deformities in hereditary multiple exostoses: factors associated with radial head dislocation and comprehensive classification. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (04) 292.e1-292.e8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Iba K, Hanaka M, Ozasa Y, Takahashi N, Kanaya K, Yamashita T. Treatment of forearm deformity with radial head dislocation because of multiple osteochondromas: a series of three cases treated by simple axis correction and distraction osteogenesis of the ulna. J Pediatr Orthop B 2018; 27 (04) 315-321
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Cha SM, Shin HD, Kim KC, Park E. Ulnar shortening for adolescent ulnar impaction syndrome: radiological and clinical outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (12) 2462-2467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hvid I, Horn J, Huhnstock S, Steen H. The biology of bone lengthening. J Child Orthop 2016; 10 (06) 487-492
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. Springer; 2014
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Goldfarb CA, Yin Y, Gilula LA, Fisher AJ, Boyer MI. Wrist fractures: what the clinician wants to know. Radiology 2001; 219 (01) 11-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kleinman WB. Stability of the distal radioulna joint: biomechanics, pathophysiology, physical diagnosis, and restoration of function what we have learned in 25 years. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (07) 1086-1106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hafner R, Poznanski AK, Donovan JM. Ulnar variance in children—standard measurements for evaluation of ulnar shortening in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, hereditary multiple exostosis and other bone or joint disorders in childhood. Skeletal Radiol 1989; 18 (07) 513-516
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Jupiter JB. Commentary: the effect of ulnar styloid fractures on patient-rated outcomes after volar locking plating of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (09) 1603-1604
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Doro C, Hayden RJ, Louis DS. Complex regional pain syndrome type I in the upper extremity. Clin Occup Environ Med 2006; 5 (02) 445-454 , x x.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86 (02) 420-428
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted Kappa and the intra- class correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 1973; 33 (03) 613-639
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Donaldson AA, Gordon CM. Skeletal complications of eating disorders. Metabolism 2015; 64 (09) 943-951
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Williams KM. Update on bone health in pediatric chronic disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2016; 45 (02) 433-441
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Li R, Saleh M, Yang L, Coulton L. Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction. J Orthop Res 2006; 24 (03) 339-347
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Shyam AK, Singh SU, Modi HN, Song HR, Lee SH, An H. Leg lengthening by distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov apparatus: a novel concept of tibia callus subsidence and its influencing factors. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (06) 1753-1759
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Zhu GH, Mei HB, He RG, Liu K, Tang J, Wu JY. Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 216
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Borzunov DY. Long bone reconstruction using multilevel lengthening of bone defect fragments. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (08) 1695-1700
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Morgan EF, Hussein AI, Al-Awadhi BA. et al. Vascular development during distraction osteogenesis proceeds by sequential intramuscular arteriogenesis followed by intraosteal angiogenesis. Bone 2012; 51 (03) 535-545
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Ho CA. Radius shaft fractures-What alignment is acceptable at what age? Plates or flexible nails?. J Pediatr Orthop 2021; 41 (Suppl. 01) S14-S19
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gong HS, Roh YW, Oh JH, Lee YH, Chung MS, Baek GH. Computed tomographic assessment of reduction of the distal radioulnar joint by gradual lengthening of the radius. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (03) 391-396
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Yadav AK, Parihar M, Pawar ED, Bansal S, , G S PK, Harsoor A. Management of forearm deformity by limb reconstruction system in children with multiple exostosis - A case report. J Orthop Case Rep 2020; 10 (06) 14-17
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Beutel BG, Klifto CS, Chu A. Timing of forearm deformity correction in a child with multiple hereditary exostosis. Am J Orthop 2014; 43 (09) 422-425
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Oh CW, Song HR, Kim JW, Choi JW, Min WK, Park BC. Limb lengthening with a submuscular locking plate. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (10) 1394-1399
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Park HW, Yang KH, Lee KS, Joo SY, Kwak YH, Kim HW. Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail with use of the Ilizarov external fixator for idiopathic short stature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (09) 1970-1978
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Cha SM, Shin HD, Kim KC, Song JH. Plating after tibial lengthening: unilateral monoaxial external fixator and locking plate. J Pediatr Orthop B 2013; 22 (06) 571-576
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Lee HS, Tasarib R, Hamzah FC, Halim AH. A novel technique-bone splitting and bone grafting in an hourglass-shaped bone following distraction osteogenesis. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020; 15 (03) 174-178
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Borzunov DY, Shastov AL. Mechanical solutions to salvage failed distraction osteogenesis in large bone defect management. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (05) 1051-1059
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Hreha J, Congiusta DV, Ahmed IH, Vosbikian MM. What is the normal ulnar bow in adult patients?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478 (01) 136-141
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar