J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2640-4562
Scientific Article

Outcomes of Distal Radial Fractures in Geriatric Patients Following Volar Locked versus Dorsal Bridge Plating

Akhil Dondapati
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Thomas J. Carroll
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Urvi Patel
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Warren C. Hammert
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ronald Gonzalez
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Constantinos Ketonis
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
› Institutsangaben

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Background

Volar locked plating (VLP) and dorsal bridge plating (DBP) are commonly used fixation techniques for distal radial fractures (DRFs). In patients older than 65 years, DRFs account for more than 18% of all fractures; however, a comparison of outcomes of these techniques in the geriatric population is absent.

Purpose

The purpose of our study was to use propensity score matching to compare both clinical and radiographic outcomes of VLP and DBP fixation of DRF in geriatric patients ≥65 years.

Materials and Methods

In total, 2,181 patients at least 65 years old with closed DRFs were retrospectively analyzed. Wrist range of motion (ROM) and radiographic outcome data were calculated at 6-month follow-up. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), and Pain Interference (PI) were calculated at each follow-up visit. Injury characteristics, surgical complications, and patient demographic data were also analyzed. A combination of propensity score matching, multivariate analysis, t-test, and chi-square tests were used to conduct the statistical analysis.

Results

After propensity matching, a total of 1,375 patients underwent VLP, whereas 275 patients underwent DBP. Within the univariate analysis, the DBP demonstrated a higher proportion of AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 23-C fracture patterns, with fewer AO/OTA 23-A compared with VLP (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated greater wrist flexion and extension, radial and ulnar deviation, supination, pronation, and grip strength, and higher PROMIS PF and PI among the VLP group (p < 0.05). At 6-month follow-up, VLP patients demonstrated greater radial inclination (21.2 vs. 20.3 degrees), lower articular step-off (0.76 vs. 0.86 mm), with similar volar tilt and radial height (p > 0.05). DBP patients had higher rates of malunion (6.2 vs. 3.0%), nonunion (4.0 vs. 2.0%), and tendon rupture (2.5 vs. 0.9%) but similar rates of revision surgery and infection (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

VLP was associated with greater wrist flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, supination, pronation, grip strength, and PROMIS PF and PI compared with DBP. There were significantly higher complication rates with DBP; however, there was a similar rate of revision surgery. While the VLP group showed significantly greater ROM and radiographic outcomes, this likely did not represent a clinically significant difference in this population.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic III.

Authors' Contributions

All named authors were actively involved in the planning and writing of the study.


Patient's Consent

A waiver of consent was granted by IRB due to the retrospective nature of the study.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Dezember 2024

Angenommen: 20. Juni 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. Juli 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (05) 908-915
  • 2 Melton III LJ, Amadio PC, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM. Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8 (04) 341-348
  • 3 Bengnér U, Johnell O. Increasing incidence of forearm fractures. A comparison of epidemiologic patterns 25 years apart. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56 (02) 158-160
  • 4 Thompson PW, Taylor J, Dawson A. The annual incidence and seasonal variation of fractures of the distal radius in men and women over 25 years in Dorset, UK. Injury 2004; 35 (05) 462-466
  • 5 Court-Brown CM, Biant L, Bugler KE, McQueen MM. Changing epidemiology of adult fractures in Scotland. Scott Med J 2014; 59 (01) 30-34
  • 6 MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. J Hand Ther 2016; 29 (02) 136-145
  • 7 Niempoog S, Sukkarnkosol S, Boontanapibul K. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with distal radius fracture from low-energy trauma. Malays Orthop J 2019; 13 (03) 15-20
  • 8 Salari N, Darvishi N, Bartina Y. et al. Global prevalence of osteoporosis among the world older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16 (01) 669
  • 9 Candela V, Di Lucia P, Carnevali C. et al. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures: a detailed survey on a large sample of patients in a suburban area. J Orthop Traumatol 2022; 23 (01) 43
  • 10 Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22 (03) 465-475
  • 11 Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J. et al. Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 1996; 7 (06) 612-618
  • 12 Martinez-Mendez D, Lizaur-Utrilla A, de Juan-Herrero J. Prospective study of comminuted articular distal radius fractures stabilized by volar plating in the elderly. Int Orthop 2018; 42 (09) 2243-2248
  • 13 Ilyas AM, Jupiter JB. Distal radius fractures–classification of treatment and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38 (02) 167-173 , v
  • 14 Lawson A, Naylor JM, Buchbinder R. et al; Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures in the Distal Radius in the Elderly (CROSSFIRE) Study Group. Surgical plating vs closed reduction for fractures in the distal radius in older patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156 (03) 229-237
  • 15 Bartl C, Stengel D, Bruckner T, Gebhard F, Group OS. ORCHID Study Group. The treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111 (46) 779-787
  • 16 Hammert WC, Kramer RC, Graham B, Keith MW. AAOS appropriate use criteria: treatment of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21 (08) 506-509
  • 17 Chung KC, Kim HM, Malay S, Shauver MJ. Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial Group. The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial: 12-month outcomes from a multicenter international randomized clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (06) 1054e-1066e
  • 18 Vannabouathong C, Hussain N, Guerra-Farfan E, Bhandari M. Interventions for distal radius fractures: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27 (13) e596-e605
  • 19 Ketter V, Kiehne C, Frink M, Aigner R, Ruchholtz S, Lenz J. Do we need standardized postoperative radiographs after locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures - a retrospective analysis of 664 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 145 (01) 28
  • 20 Bennett HQ, Kingston A, Lourida I. et al; Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies Collaboration. A comparison over 2 decades of disability-free life expectancy at age 65 years for those with long-term conditions in England: analysis of the 2 longitudinal Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies. PLoS Med 2022; 19 (03) e1003936
  • 21 Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (08) 1868-1873
  • 22 Chung KC, Squitieri L, Kim HM. Comparative outcomes study using the volar locking plating system for distal radius fractures in both young adults and adults older than 60 years. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (06) 809-819
  • 23 Hooper RC, Zhou N, Wang L, Shauver MJ, Chung KC, Group W. WRIST Group. Pre-injury activity predicts outcomes following distal radius fractures in patients age 60 and older. PLoS One 2020; 15 (05) e0232684
  • 24 Jayaram M, Wu H, Yoon AP, Kane RL, Wang L, Chung KC. Comparison of distal radius fracture outcomes in older adults stratified by chronologic vs physiologic age managed with casting vs surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (02) e2255786
  • 25 Tannan SC, Pappou IP, Gwathmey FW, Freilich AM, Chhabra AB. The extended flexor carpi radialis approach for concurrent carpal tunnel release and volar plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (10) 2026-2031.e1
  • 26 Jakim I, Pieterse HS, Sweet MB. External fixation for intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (02) 302-306
  • 27 Cady-McCrea C, Brodell Jr JD, Carroll TJ. et al. Adjunctive dorsal spanning plate fixation for challenging distal radius injuries. J Orthop 2024; 54: 5-9
  • 28 Anderson JT, Lucas GL, Buhr BR. Complications of treating distal radius fractures with external fixation: a community experience. Iowa Orthop J 2004; 24: 53-59
  • 29 Wolf JC, Weil WM, Hanel DP, Trumble TE. A biomechanic comparison of an internal radiocarpal-spanning 2.4-mm locking plate and external fixation in a model of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (10) 1578-1586
  • 30 Raducha JE, Hresko A, Molino J, Got CJ, Katarincic J, Gil JA. Weight-bearing restrictions with distal radius wrist-spanning dorsal bridge plates. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47 (02) 188.e1-188.e8
  • 31 Chhabra AB, Yildirim B. Adult distal radius fracture management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29 (22) e1105-e1116
  • 32 Chen JW, Maldonado DR, Kowalski BL. et al. Best practice guidelines for propensity score methods in medical research: consideration on theory, implementation, and reporting. a review. Arthroscopy 2022; 38 (02) 632-642
  • 33 Kirsch JM, Puzzitiello RN, Swanson D. et al. Outcomes after anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104 (15) 1362-1369
  • 34 Luokkala T, Laitinen MK, Hevonkorpi TP, Raittio L, Mattila VM, Launonen AP. Distal radius fractures in the elderly population. EFORT Open Rev 2020; 5 (06) 361-370
  • 35 Leixnering M, Rosenauer R, Pezzei C. et al. Indications, surgical approach, reduction, and stabilization techniques of distal radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140 (05) 611-621
  • 36 Fares AB, Childs BR, Polmear MM, Clark DM, Nesti LJ, Dunn JC. Dorsal bridge plate for distal radius fractures: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46 (07) 627.e1-627.e8
  • 37 Kaya O, Gulabi D, Buyukdogan H, Baris AC, Kilic B, Caliskan M. Clinical results of distal radius intraarticular comminuted fractures in the elderly: a retrospective comparative analysis of different fixation methods. Cureus 2022; 14 (08) e28077
  • 38 Hollenberg AM, Mao JZ, Hammert WC. Outcomes following surgical treatment of distal radial fracture: a comparison of older and younger patients using PROMIS. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2022; 47 (06) 590-596
  • 39 Carroll TJ, Dondapati A, Malin M, Ketonis C, Hammert W, Gonzalez R. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following volar-locked plating versus dorsal bridge plating for distal radius factures. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2023; 6 (02) 227-232
  • 40 Hollenberg AM, Hammert WC. Minimal clinically important difference for PROMIS physical function and pain interference in patients following surgical treatment of distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47 (02) 137-144
  • 41 Chung KC, Haas A. Relationship between patient satisfaction and objective functional outcome after surgical treatment for distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 2009; 22 (04) 302-307 , quiz 308
  • 42 Günther CM, Bürger A, Rickert M, Crispin A, Schulz CU. Grip strength in healthy Caucasian adults: reference values. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (04) 558-565
  • 43 Lee YS, Wei TY, Cheng YC, Hsu TL, Huang CR. A comparative study of Colles' fractures in patients between fifty and seventy years of age: percutaneous K-wiring versus volar locking plating. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (04) 789-794
  • 44 Huang YY, Lin TY, Chen CH, Chou YC, Su CY. Surgical outcomes of elderly patients aged more than 80 years with distal radius fracture: comparison of external fixation and locking plate. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21 (01) 91
  • 45 Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J. et al. Functional and radiological outcome of distal radius fractures stabilized by volar-locking plate with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140 (06) 843-852
  • 46 Schmidt V, Gordon M, Tägil M, Sayed-Noor A, Mukka S, Wadsten M. Association between radiographic and clinical outcomes following distal radial fractures: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up in 366 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105 (15) 1156-1167
  • 47 Li Y, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Tian D, Zhang B. Incidence of complications and secondary procedure following distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate (VLP). J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14 (01) 295
  • 48 Nwosu C, Rodriguez K, Zeng S, Klifto KM, Klifto CS, Ruch DS. Complications following volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures in adults: a systematic review of randomized control trials. J Hand Surg Am 2023; 48 (09) 861-874
  • 49 Lauder A, Agnew S, Bakri K, Allan CH, Hanel DP, Huang JI. Functional outcomes following bridge plate fixation for distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (08) 1554-1562
  • 50 Townsley SH, Pulos N, Shin AY. Complications of operatively treated distal radial fractures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2024; 49 (02) 215-225
  • 51 Kloberdanz AL, Meyer J, Kammermeier K. et al. Impact of body mass index on fracture severity, clinical, radiological and functional outcome in distal radius fractures: a retrospective observational study after surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144 (06) 2915-2923