Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20(2): 73-77
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1241871
Review

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pediatric Surgical Technique: Laparoscopic or Open Approach? A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

M. J. Billingham1 , S. J. Basterfield2
  • 1George Eliot Hospital, Medicine and Surgery, Nuneaton, United Kingdom
  • 2University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Medicine and Surgery, Coventry, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

received December 24, 2008

accepted after revision September 06, 2009

Publication Date:
30 October 2009 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: The laparoscopic treatment of pediatric populations remains controversial. This review was conducted to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for a variety of surgical indications in pediatric populations.

Method/Design: A computerized comprehensive search supplemented by a manual review of the literature was performed for all peer-reviewed publications comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy, fundoplication and hernia repair cohorts. Outcomes of interest were length of stay (LOS), operating room (OR) time, complication rates and total hospital costs; aggregation of outcome rates was performed with the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results: A total of 24 articles were identified that met the search and inclusion criteria. LOS was found to be significantly reduced in favor of the laparoscopic approach, with a weighted mean difference of −1.44 days, although the OR time was significantly increased, with a weighted mean difference of +12.8 min. Laparoscopic intervention was associated with a significantly reduced complication rate compared to the open approach (10.6 vs. 15.6%). Total hospital costs of the laparoscopic approaches were found to be insignificantly increased compared to the open techniques.

Conclusion: This review further supports the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric populations, demonstrating that the three types laparoscopic procedures reviewed resulted in better patient outcomes compared to open procedures, in the form of reduced LOS and overall complication rates. Increased utilization of this approach may prove beneficial to pediatric patients.

References

  • 1 Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP. et al . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: A meta-analysis.  Ann Surg. 2006;  243 17-27
  • 2 Bozkurt P, Kaya G, Altinas F. et al . Systemic stress response during operations for acute abdominal pain performed via laparoscopy or laparotomy in children.  Anaesthesia. 2000;  55 5-9
  • 3 Chan KL, Hui WC, Tam PKH. Prospective, randomized, single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs. open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 927-932
  • 4 Dronov AF, Kotlobovskii, Poddubnyi IV. Laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients: experience of 2 300 operations.  Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2000;  6 30-36
  • 5 Eldridge B, Kimber C, Wolfe R. et al . Uptime as a measure of recovery in children postappendectomy.  J Pediatr Surg. 2003;  38 1822-1825
  • 6 Firilas AM, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Minimally invasive surgery: The pediatric surgery experience.  J Am Coll Surg. 1998;  186 542-544
  • 7 Gans SL, Berci G. Advances in endoscopy of infants and children.  J Pediatr Surg. 1971;  6 199-233
  • 8 Georgeson KE, Owings E. Advances in minimally invasive surgery in children.  Am J Surg. 2000;  180 362-364
  • 9 Gilchrist BF, Lobe TE, Schropp KP. et al . Is there a role for laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric surgery?.  J Pediatr Surg. 1992;  27 209-212
  • 10 Grosfeld JL. Current concepts in inguinal hernia in infants and children.  World J Surg. 1989;  13 506-515
  • 11 Hay SA. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in children.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;  13 21-23
  • 12 Iglesias JL, Meier DE, Thompson WR. Cost analysis of laparoscopic and open fundoplication in children.  Pediatr Endosurg Innov Techn. 1997;  1 15-21
  • 13 Iwanaka T, Arai M, Ito M. et al . Laparoscopic surgery in neonates and infants weighing less than 5 kg.  Pediatr Int. 2000;  42 608-612
  • 14 Kapur P, Caty MG, Glick PL. Pediatric hernias and hydroceles.  Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;  45 773-789
  • 15 Koivusalo AI, Korpela R, Wirtavuori K. et al . A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair in children.  Pediatrics. 2009;  123 332-337
  • 16 Kotlobovsky VI, Dronov AF, Poddubnyi IV. et al . Comparative study of surgical and endosurgical treatment of generalized appendicular peritonitis in children.  Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2003;  7 32-37
  • 17 Lavonius MI, Liesjarvi S, Ovaska J. et al . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: A prospective randomised study.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  11 235-238
  • 18 Leape LL, Ramenofsky ML. Laparoscopy in Children.  Pediatrics. 1980;  66 215-220
  • 19 LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: Preliminary findings.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;  3 39-41
  • 20 Lee KH, Yeung CK. Laparoscopic surgery in newborns and infants: An update.  HK J Paediatr. 2003;  8 327-335
  • 21 Lejus C, Delile L, Plattner V. et al . Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: Effects on postoperative analgesia.  Anesthesiology. 1996;  84 801-806
  • 22 Li P, Xu Q, Ji Z. et al . Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children.  J Pediatr Surg. 2005;  40 1279-1283
  • 23 Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K. et al . The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;  158 34-37
  • 24 Little DC, Custer MD, May BH. et al . Laparoscopic appendectomy: An unnecessary and expensive procedure in children?.  J Pediatr Surg. 2002;  37 310-317
  • 25 Mattioli G, Repetto P, Carlini C. et al . Laparoscopic vs open approach for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 750-752
  • 26 McHoney M, Eaton S, Wade A. et al . Inflammatory response in children after laparoscopic vs open Nissen fundoplication: Randomized controlled trial.  J Pediatr Surg. 2005;  40 908-914
  • 27 Newman K, Ponsky T, Kittle K. et al . Appendicitis 2000: Variability in practice, outcomes, and resource utilization at thirty pediatric hospitals.  J Pediatr Surg. 2003;  38 372-379
  • 28 Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG. et al . Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 242-245
  • 29 Padankatti LR, Pramod RK, Gupta A. et al . Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: A prospective study.  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2008;  13 104-106
  • 30 Paya K, Fakhari M, Rauhofer U. et al . Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A comparison of complications.  JSLS. 2000;  4 121-124
  • 31 Rogers DA, Hatley RM, Howell CG. A prospective, randomized comparison of traditional and laparoscopic inguinal exploration in children.  Am Surg. 1998;  64 119-121
  • 32 Saranga Bharathi R, Arora M, Baskaran V. Pediatric inguinal hernia: laparoscopic versus open surgery.  JSLS. 2008;  12 277-281
  • 33 Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM. et al . eds.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assement No. 43 (Prepared By the University Of California At San Francisco-Stanford Evidence-based Practice Center under contract No. 290-97-0013), AHRQ Publication NO. 01-E058, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcase Research and Quality. July 2001. 
  • 34 Simon P, Burkhardt U, Sack U. et al . Inflammatory response is no different in children randomized to laparoscopic or open appendectomy. .  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2008;  19 71-76
  • 35 West S, King V, Carey TS. et al . Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.  Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47 (prepared by the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0011). AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2002; 

Correspondence

Mathew James Billingham

George Eliot Hospital Medicine and Surgery

College Street

Nuneaton Warwickshire CV10 7DJ

United Kingdom

Phone: +44 7708 572668

Fax: +44 2476 865175

Email: mbillingham@doctors.org.uk

    >