RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1261926
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Open versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Pyloric Stenosis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Publikationsverlauf
received December 05, 2009
accepted after revision April 05, 2010
Publikationsdatum:
18. Oktober 2010 (online)

Abstract
Objective: Aim of the study was to compare the outcomes after laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP) with those of open pyloromyotomy (OP) for infantile pyloric stenosis.
Method: We conducted searches until February 2009 in multiple databases and identified randomized controlled trials comparing LP with OP for pyloric stenosis. Results were expressed using the odds ratio (OR) for categorical variables and standard weighted mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1 guidelines and statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.8 software.
Results: 3 studies totaling 492 infants were included. The results showed no significant differences in complications between the groups with regard to wound infection (OR: 1.77, 95% CI 0.58–5.35), mucosal perforations (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.22–4.26), incisional hernia or granuloma (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.41–4.73), incomplete pyloromyotomy (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02–1.07), substantial vomiting (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.30–1.52) and total complications (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.54–1.53). Although the combined result of 2 studies also indicated an insignificant discrepancy in time-related outcomes for full time to feeds, length of stay after surgery and operating time (SMD: 0.78, 95% CI: −0.50–2.06; SMD: 1.27, 95% CI: −1.56–4.10; SMD: −0.46, 95% CI: −1.11–0.20, respectively), another study indicated shorter times for LP procedures (p=0.002, 0.027, and 0.008, respectively).
Conclusions: Only a few trials were available for analysis. Heterogeneity was seen between studies, but the available trials were of high quality. The present study shows that both OP and LP are equally safe and effective procedures for the management of pyloric stenosis in children. However, there was a trend in LP toward shorter time time-related outcomes.
Key words
pyloric stenosis - open pyloromyotomy - laparoscopic pyloromyotomy - infants - systematic review
References
- 1
Maheshwai N.
Are young infants treated with erythromycin at risk for developing hypertrophic pyloric
stenosis.
Arch Dis Child.
2007;
2
(3)
271-273
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 2
Huddy SP.
Investigation and diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
J R Coll Surg Edinb.
1991;
2)
91-93
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 3
Pedersen RN, Garne E, Loane M. et al .
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a comparative study of incidence and other
epidemiological characteristics in 7 European regions.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
2008;
21
(9)
599-604
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 4
Sommerfield T, Chalmers J, Youngson G. et al .
The changing epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in Scotland.
Arch Dis Child.
2008;
3
(12)
1007-1011
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 5
Aspelund G, Langer JC.
Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
Semin Pediatr Surg.
2007;
6
(1)
27-33
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 6
Alain JL, Grousseau D, Terrier G.
Extra-mucosa pylorotomy by laparoscopy.
Chir Pediatr.
1990;
31
(4–5)
223-224
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 7
Van der Bilt JD, Kramer WL, van der Zee DC. et al .
Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: impact of experience
on the results in 182 cases.
Surg Endosc.
2004;
18
(6)
907-909
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 8
Hall NJ, van Der Zee J, Tan HL. et al .
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy.
Ann Surg.
2004;
240
(5)
774-778
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 9
St Peter SD, Holcomb GW, Calkins CM et al 3rd.
Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized
trial.
Ann Surg.
2006;
244
(3)
363-370
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 10
Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S. et al .
Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind
multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Lancet.
2009;
373
(9661)
390-398
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 11
Higgins JPT, Green S.
(eds.)
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September
2008].
The Cochrane Collaboration 2008. Available at:
http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 12
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG.
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
Stat Med.
2002;
21
(11)
1539-1558
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 13
Leclair MD, Plattner V, Mirallie E. et al .
Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized
controlled trial.
J Pediatr Surg.
2007;
42
(4)
692-698
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 14
Ford WD, Crameri JA, Holland AJ.
The learning curve for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.
J Pediatr Surg.
1997;
32
(4)
552-554
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 15
Sitsen E, Bax NM, van der Zee DC.
Is laparoscopic pyloromyotomy superior to open surgery?.
Surg Endosc.
1998;
12
(6)
813-815
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 16
Campbell BT, McLean K, Barnhart DC. et al .
A comparison of laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy at a teaching hospital.
J Pediatr Surg.
2002;
37
(7)
1068-1071
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 17
Hulka F, Harrison MW, Campbell TJ. et al .
Complications of pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
Am J Surg.
1997;
173
(5)
450-452
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
Correspondence
KeHu Yang
Evidence Based Medicine Center
School of Basic Medical Sciences
Lanzhou University
Dong Gang Road NO 199
+86730000 Lanzhou
China
Telefon: +86 891 5076
Fax: +86 891 5076
eMail: kehuyangebm2006@126.com