Closure of Large Meningomyelocele Wound Defects with Subcutaneous Based Pedicle Flap with Bilateral V-Y Advancement: Our Experience and Review of Literature

Abstract

Background Meningomyelocele is a defect of the spinal cord, vertebrae, and the overlying skin and is the most common form of open spinal dysraphism. Rapid closure of the back defect in the early postnatal period is mandatory to reduce the frequency of infection-related complications of the central nervous system. Majority of the cases present with small defects, which can be closed primarily, with or without subcutaneous dissection. However, direct closure is not possible in 25% of the cases. Different types of local flaps (skin or muscle flaps) are widely used for covering the skin defects; and with varying results.

Patients and Methods A prospective nonrandomized study was conducted in the department of pediatric surgery at a tertiary hospital, from September 2007 to October 2011. Overall 35 patients with large meningomyelocele defects that could not be closed primarily were included in the study. All patients were treated using subcutaneous tissue based pedicle flap with bilateral V-Y advancement.

Results There were 27 neonates, 7 infants, and 1 child, with a male:female ratio of 1.19:1. There were 3 thoracolumbar, 14 lumbar, 14 lumbosacral, 3 sacral, and 1 multiple meningomyelocele defects with an average size of 8.5 cm (range 6.5–11 cm). Average intraoperative blood loss was 8 mL (range 6–10.5 mL). Average operative time which included flap reconstruction time, after closure of dura, was 38.6 min. Total seven patients had wound complications viz. fat necrosis (n = 2), flap necrosis (n = 2), hematoma (n = 1), cerebrospinal fluid leak followed by wound dehiscence (n = 1), wound infection which led to meningitis (n = 1). Average healing time for flap repair was 7.52 days. Overall 80% (n = 28) of the patients had good flap texture and contour with satisfactory cosmesis.

Conclusion Closure of large meningomyelocele wound defects with subcutaneous based pedicle flap with bilateral V-Y advancement is an effective technique. The main advantages of this technique are its simplicity, short operative time, good tolerance, early healing, and good cosmetic outcome with an excellent flap texture and contour match with minimal complications.

Keywords

meningomyelocele - subcutaneous based pedicle flap - bilateral V-Y advancement

• References

• 1 Oakes WJ. Spinal dysraphism. In: Serafin D, Georgiade N, , eds. Pediatric Plastic Surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1984
• 2 Nance WE. Anencephaly and spina bifida: an etiologic hypothesis. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1971; 7 (1) 97-102
• 3 Lister J. Open meningomyelocele and encephalocele. In: Lister J, Irving IM, , eds. Neonatal Surgery. 3rd ed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1990
• 4 Laurence KM. Effect of early surgery for spina bifida cystica on survival and quality of life. Lancet 1974; 1 (7852) 301-304
• 5 Katzen M. The total care of spina bifida cystica. Surg Annu 1981; 13: 325-339
• 6 Patterson TJ. The use of rotation flaps following excision of lumbar myelo-meningoceles: an aid to the closure of large defects. Br J Surg 1959; 46: 606-608
• 7 Fukada O. Experience of a sliding subcutaneous flap for the deformities of lower eyelid. Opthalmology (Japan) 1974; 16: 575-584
• 8 Nakajima T, Yoshimura Y, Kami T. The subcutaneous pedicle flap: widening of its applications. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 19 (2) 103-116
• 9 Mustardé JC. Reconstruction of the spinal canal in severe spina bifida. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42 (2) 109-114
• 10 Luce EA, Stigers SW, Vandenbrink KD, Walsh JW. Split-thickness skin grafting of the myelomeningocele defect: a subset at risk for late ulceration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (1) 116-121
• 11 Zide BM, Spina bifida, McCarthy JG , ed. Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed, vol. 6. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990. 3780.
• 12 Blanco-Dávila F, Luce EA. Current considerations for myelomeningocele repair. J Craniofac Surg 2000; 11 (5) 500-508
• 13 Stevenson TR, Rohrich RJ, Pollock RA, Dingman RO, Bostwick III J. More experience with the “reverse” latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap: precise location of blood supply. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74 (2) 237-243
• 14 Thomas CV. Closure of large spina bifida defects: a simple technique based on anatomical details. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31 (6) 522-527
• 15 Hill HL, Brown RG, Jurkiewicz MJ. The transverse lumbosacral back flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 62 (2) 177-184
• 16 Desprez JD, Kiehn CL, Eckstein W. Closure of large meningomyelocele defects by composite skin-muscle flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 47 (3) 234-238
• 17 McCraw JB, Penix JO, Freeman BG, Vincent MP, Wirth FH. Soft-tissue repair of myelomeningocele defects using bilateral latissimus dorsi and trapezius musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 18 (2) 147-155
• 18 McCraw JB, Penix JO, Baker JW. Repair of major defects of the chest wall and spine with the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 62 (2) 197-206
• 19 Moore TS, Dreyer TM, Bevin AG. Closure of large spina bifida cystica defects with bilateral bipedicled musculocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (2) 288-292
• 20 Cruz NI, Ariyan S, Duncan CC, Cuono CB. Repair of lumbosacral myelomeningoceles with double Z-rhomboid flaps. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1983; 59 (4) 714-717
• 21 Ulusoy MG, Koçer U, Sungur N , et al. Closure of meningomyelocele defects with bilateral modified V-Y advancement flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (6) 640-644
• 22 El-Sayed M, Abdel-Aziz A, Ahmed M , et al. Large meningomyeloceles closure with proximally based fasciocutaneous flank flap. Egypt J Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 30 (1) 1-5
• 23 Georgeana P, Daciana G, Nemes M , et al. Tissue expansion for the delayed closure of myelomeningoceles—our experience. Oradea Med J. 2009; 1: 7-9