Eur J Pediatr Surg 2015; 25(01): 20-26
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1386645
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Tertiary Surgery for Complicated Repair of Esophageal Atresia

Ruben Ortiz
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
,
Alba Sánchez Galán
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
,
Leopoldo Martinez
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
,
Eva Dominguez
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
,
Francisco Hernández
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
,
Manuel Lopez Santamaria
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
,
Juan Antonio Tovar
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 May 2014

23 June 2014

Publication Date:
21 August 2014 (online)

Abstract

Aim The ideal repair of esophageal atresia (EA) is primary anastomosis with closure of the fistula if present. Long gap or local circumstances prompt other procedures that occasionally lead to disastrous complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the management of these complications in a tertiary referral center.

Patients and Methods A retrospective review of patients treated for EA between 1993 and 2013 was conducted. Both the patients were primarily treated by us, and referrals from elsewhere after two or more failed operations were included.

Results In total, 23 patients were included (3/176 cases of EA treated primarily by us and 20 referrals). Of the 23 patients, 6 had type I EA, 15 type III (four long gaps), 1 type IV, and 1 type V. Cardiac anomalies were associated in seven cases, duodenal atresia in three, and Down syndrome in two patients. Primary anastomosis was initially achieved in 12 patients. Primary or secondary Foker lengthening was used in seven cases. The causes of the failure were anastomotic leaks in nine, unmanageable strictures in seven, and refistulization in five patients. These patients required 66 reoperations (median of 3 [2–7]) before inclusion in the study. Radical tertiary treatment consisted of 15 esophageal replacements (11 colonic grafts and 4 gastric pull-ups), and 1 esophageal-gastric disconnection. Five patients previously treated with esophageal replacement and referred for graft problems required 13 interventions. Two families did not give consent for one replacement and one disconnection. Complications appeared in 12 patients, and 9 additional operations were required in 7 patients. With a follow-up of 31 months (range, 4–139 months) 15 patients take all their meals per os, 5 occasionally use the gastrostomy, and 2 and 1 are fed exclusively via gastrostomy or jejunostomy. All tracheoesophageal fistulas were closed, but 15 cases are below p3 for weight and 12 for height. Three patients (13%) ultimately died 32 months (range, 9–56 months) after the first operation (due to aspiration in one, and for causes unrelated to it in the other two [tracheostomy obstruction and Guillain–Barré syndrome]).

Conclusions When repeated complications appear after EA repair, radical surgical attitudes may be justified. If esophageal continuity cannot be reestablished, the native esophagus may have to be discarded and replaced. Many complications should be expected, but the end result can be good. These patients should be referred to centers with large experience in the management of this complex condition.

 
  • References

  • 1 Spitz L. Oesophageal atresia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2: 24
  • 2 Tovar JA, Fragoso AC. Current controversies in the surgical treatment of esophageal atresia. Scand J Surg 2011; 100 (4) 273-278
  • 3 Puri P, Khurana S. Delayed primary esophageal anastomosis for pure esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 1998; 7 (2) 126-129
  • 4 Sri Paran T, Decaluwe D, Corbally M, Puri P. Long-term results of delayed primary anastomosis for pure oesophageal atresia: a 27-year follow up. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23 (7) 647-651
  • 5 Foker JE, Linden BC, Boyle Jr EM, Marquardt C. Development of a true primary repair for the full spectrum of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 1997; 226 (4) 533-541 , discussion 541–543
  • 6 Kimura K, Nishijima E, Tsugawa C , et al. Multistaged extrathoracic esophageal elongation procedure for long gap esophageal atresia: Experience with 12 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36 (11) 1725-1727
  • 7 Spitz L. Gastric transposition in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (1) 30-33
  • 8 Hamza AF. Colonic replacement in cases of esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (1) 40-43
  • 9 Foker JE, Kendall Krosch TC, Catton K, Munro F, Khan KM. Long-gap esophageal atresia treated by growth induction: the biological potential and early follow-up results. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (1) 23-29
  • 10 Sroka M, Wachowiak R, Losin M , et al. The Foker technique (FT) and Kimura advancement (KA) for the treatment of children with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA): lessons learned at two European centers. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (1) 3-7
  • 11 Friedmacher F, Puri P. Delayed primary anastomosis for management of long-gap esophageal atresia: a meta-analysis of complications and long-term outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28 (9) 899-906
  • 12 Loukogeorgakis SP, Pierro A. Replacement surgery for esophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (3) 182-190
  • 13 Gallo G, Zwaveling S, Groen H, Van der Zee D, Hulscher J. Long-gap esophageal atresia: a meta-analysis of jejunal interposition, colon interposition, and gastric pull-up. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (6) 420-425
  • 14 Spitz L, Kiely E, Sparnon T. Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children. Ann Surg 1987; 206 (1) 69-73
  • 15 Hendren WH, Hendren WG. Colon interposition for esophagus in children. J Pediatr Surg 1985; 20 (6) 829-839
  • 16 Stone MM, Fonkalsrud EW, Mahour GH, Weitzman JJ, Takiff H. Esophageal replacement with colon interposition in children. Ann Surg 1986; 203 (4) 346-351
  • 17 Mitchell IM, Goh DW, Roberts KD, Abrams LD. Colon interposition in children. Br J Surg 1989; 76 (7) 681-686
  • 18 Burgos L, Barrena S, Andrés AM , et al. Colonic interposition for esophageal replacement in children remains a good choice: 33-year median follow-up of 65 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (2) 341-345
  • 19 Bruch SW, Hirschl RB, Coran AG. The diagnosis and management of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (2) 337-340
  • 20 Coran AG. Redo esophageal surgery: the diagnosis and management of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatr Surg Int 2013; 29 (10) 995-999