Synthesis 2016; 48(15): 2461-2465
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1560447
paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Oligomerization Reactions of Bis(ethynyl)tetraphenylporphyrin Derivatives by Glaser–Hay Coupling Reaction: Isolation and Characterization of Dimer, Trimer, and Tetramer

Shahed Rana
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachi-Oji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan   Email: sugiura@porphyrin.jp
,
Ken-ichi Yamashita
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachi-Oji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan   Email: sugiura@porphyrin.jp
,
Ken-ichi Sugiura*
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachi-Oji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan   Email: sugiura@porphyrin.jp
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 January 2016

Accepted after revision: 07 March 2016

Publication Date:
28 April 2016 (online)


Abstract

The Glaser–Hay coupling reaction of a tetraphenylporphyrin derivative having two acetylenes in the quasi-trans positions was carried out. Although this oxidative coupling reaction has high reactivity and produces various butadiynylene oligomers, the degree of oligo­merization was low. A large substrate and/or product might decrease the frequency factor of the Arrhenius equation and the resultant rate constant. This finding is in agreement with that of the one-pot synthesis of structurally well-defined porphyrin oligomers, such as trimers and tetramers, which are used frequently in the field of advanced materials.

Supporting Information

 
  • References

  • 1 For a review of molecular wires, see: Schubert C, Margraf JT, Clark T, Guldi DM. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 988 ; and references therein
  • 2 Nitzan A, Ratner MA. Science (Washington, D. C.) 2003; 300: 1384
    • 3a Creager S, Yu CJ, Bamdad C, O’Connor S, MacLean T, Lam E, Chong Y, Olsen GT, Luo J, Gozin M, Kayyem JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 1059
    • 3b Astumian RD, Derenyi I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001; 86: 3859
    • 3c Remacle F, Levine RD. Faraday Discuss. 2006; 131: 45
  • 4 For a review of porphyrin wires, see: Tanaka T, Osuka A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 943 ; and reference therein
    • 5a Review: Anderson HL. Chem. Commun. 1999; 2323
    • 5b Anderson HL, Martin SJ, Bradley DD. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994; 33: 655
    • 5c The substituents in Anderson’s substrate, isoprenoide, might be smaller than those in our substrate 1(1HH). Therefore, Anderson observed slightly higher order oligomers, the degree of oligomerization of which ranged from 10 to 15. However, our substrate and Anderson’s substrate were much larger than conventional substrates used in polymer chemistry; therefore, frequency factor A and resultant k should be smaller.
  • 6 Rana S, Yamashita K.-i, Akita Y, Sugiura Ki. Chem. Lett. 2015; 44: 1226
  • 7 To the best of our knowledge, no TPP-based butadiynylene oligomer, i.e., porphyrin oligomer connected by bis(1,4-phenylene)butadiynylene (–C6H4–C≡C–C≡C–C6H4–), has been reported previously. A related dimer based on 5,15-diarylporphyrin was reported: Ishida T, Morisaki Y, Chujo Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 5265
  • 8 Hay AS. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 1969; 7: 1625
  • 9 Hutin M, Sprafke JK, Odell B, Anderson HL, Claridge TD. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 12798
  • 10 Williams VE, Swager TM. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2000; 38: 4669
  • 11 In the synthesis of structurally well-defined 1,3-pyrenylene, we found that the dimer was a better precursor for the oligomerization reaction than the monomer in terms of degree of oligomerization, purities of the products, and yields: Yamashita K.-i, Nakamura A, Sugiura K.-i. Chem. Lett. 2015; 44: 303
  • 12 Winters MU, Dahlsted E, Blades HE, Wilson CJ, Frampton MJ, Anderson HL, Albinsson B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 4291
  • 13 Wagner RW, Lindsey JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994; 116: 9759
  • 14 Lovett JE, Hoffmann M, Cnossen A, Shutter AT. J, Hogben HJ, Warren JE, Pascu SI, Kay CW. M, Timmel CR, Anderson HL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 13852
  • 15 Dien LX, Yamashita K.-i, Asano MS, Sugiura K.-i. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2015; 432: 103
  • 16 Elemental analyses of carefully purified 2 (HH) were carried out repeatedly, but the obtained values changed every time. 1H NMR measurement of these samples did not show any contamination, including solvent molecules, so we concluded that 2 (HH) is hardly combustible. For example, ‘Sample #1’ afforded markedly different values that were larger than the experimental error. This behavior supports our conclusion. Therefore, we use Sample #1 in our spectroscopic studies. The results of elemental analyses are shown in Table 1.
  • 17 Yamashita K.-i, Akita Y, Asano MS, Tanaka H, Kawai T, Sugiura K.-i. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2010; 14: 1040