Eur J Pediatr Surg 2018; 28(01): 012-017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606845
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Single-Center Experience with Dynamic Compression Bracing for Children with Pectus Carinatum

Ashwini Suresh Poola
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Amy L. Pierce
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Beth A. Orrick
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Shawn David St. Peter
2   Department of Surgery, Center for Prospective Clinical Trials, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Charles L. Snyder
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
David Juang
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Pablo Aguayo
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Jason D. Fraser
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
George W. Holcomb III
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 April 2017

14 August 2017

Publication Date:
25 September 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objective Bracing for pectus carinatum (PC) has emerged as an alternative to surgical correction. However, predictive factors for bracing remain poorly understood, as much of the data have been reported from small series.

Materials and Methods We reviewed a prospective dataset in patients with PC who underwent dynamic compression bracing (DCB) from July 2011 to July 2016. Bracing was initiated in patients > 10 years of age with a significant PC and desire for bracing. Data were analyzed for those observed two or more times after the brace was fitted to the patient.

Results A total of 503 patients were evaluated for PC and 340 (68%) underwent DCB. Eighty-five percent were males with an average age of 14 ± 2 years. There was a positive correlation of age with pressure of initial correction (PIC, r = 0.2). One patient underwent operative correction as the initial therapy. Two hundred seventeen patients had two or more visits after the patient was fitted for the brace. The mean PIC in this cohort was 4 psi (range: 1.5–7.8), and the median duration of bracing in this group was 16 months (IQR: 7–23 months). One hundred three patients (47%) achieved complete correction after an average bracing time of 7.5 months and were then placed in the retainer mode. Thirty patients successfully completed bracing therapy and required an average of 23 months of therapy (2 months–4 years). No patient recurred after bracing was completed, but one failed bracing and required operative correction. Complications included mechanical problems (8%), skin complications (10%), complaints of tightness (3%), and pain (2%).

Conclusion DCB has both early and lasting effects in the correction of PC with minimal complications. Predictive factors for successful resolution of the PC include increased duration of DCB and lower initial PIC.

 
  • References

  • 1 Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE. Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 21 (01) 44-57
  • 2 Haje SA, Harcke HT, Bowen JR. Growth disturbance of the sternum and pectus deformities: imaging studies and clinical correlation. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29 (05) 334-341
  • 3 Coelho MS, Guimarães PS. Pectus carinatum [article in English, Portuguese]. J Bras Pneumol 2007; 33 (04) 463-474
  • 4 Fonkalsrud EW, Beanes S. Surgical management of pectus carinatum: 30 years' experience. World J Surg 2001; 25 (07) 898-903
  • 5 Steinmann C, Krille S, Mueller A, Weber P, Reingruber B, Martin A. Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients suffer from lower quality of life and impaired body image: a control group comparison of psychological characteristics prior to surgical correction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (05) 1138-1145
  • 6 Krille S, Müller A, Steinmann C, Reingruber B, Weber P, Martin A. Self- and social perception of physical appearance in chest wall deformity. Body Image 2012; 9 (02) 246-252
  • 7 Knudsen MV, Grosen K, Pilegaard HK, Laustsen S. Surgical correction of pectus carinatum improves perceived body image, mental health and self-esteem. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (09) 1472-1476
  • 8 Gonzalez KW, Dalton BG, Poola AS. , et al. The impact of developing a pectus center for chest wall deformities. Pediatr Surg Int 2016; 32 (07) 701-704
  • 9 Banever GT, Konefal SH, Gettens K, Moriarty KP. Nonoperative correction of pectus carinatum with orthotic bracing. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006; 16 (02) 164-167
  • 10 Frey AS, Garcia VF, Brown RL. , et al. Nonoperative management of pectus carinatum. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41 (01) 40-45 ; discussion 40–45
  • 11 Martinez-Ferro M, Fraire C, Bernard S. Dynamic compression system for the correction of pectus carinatum. Semin Pediatr Surg 2008; 17 (03) 194-200
  • 12 Lee RT, Moorman S, Schneider M, Sigalet DL. Bracing is an effective therapy for pectus carinatum: interim results. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (01) 184-190
  • 13 Emil S, Laberge JM, Sigalet D, Baird R. Pectus carinatum treatment in Canada: current practices. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (05) 862-866
  • 14 Emil S, Sévigny M, Montpetit K. , et al. Success and duration of dynamic bracing for pectus carinatum: a four-year prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (01) 124-129
  • 15 Wahba G, Nasr A, Bettolli M. A less intensive bracing protocol for pectus carinatum. J Pediatr Surg 2017; DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.057.
  • 16 Mielke CH, Winter RB. Pectus carinatum successfully treated with bracing. A case report. Int Orthop 1993; 17 (06) 350-352