J Hand Microsurg 2018; 10(01): 026-028
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1618913
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Decreased Rate of Complications in Carpal Tunnel Release with Hand Fellowship Training

Santosh J. Mathen
1   The Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
,
Naveed N. Nosrati
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
,
Gregory A. Merrell
1   The Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 23 January 2017

Accepted: 19 November 2017

Publication Date:
20 March 2018 (online)

Abstract

Purpose In many procedures, both high case volumes and fellowship training have been shown to improve outcomes. One of the most common procedures performed by hand surgeons, the carpal tunnel release (CTR) is also performed by several other specialties without specialty training in a hand fellowship. This study analyzed the effect that hand fellowship training has on outcomes of CTRs.

Materials and Methods Using the American Board of Orthopedic Surgeons (ABOS) Part II candidates’ case list submissions, a database was created for all open and endoscopic CTRs. Surgeon training, demographics, technique, and complications were recorded. Complications were then categorized and broken down by technique. Results were then analyzed for statistical significance.

Results A total of 29,916 cases were identified. Hand fellowship–trained surgeons performed six times more CTRs at 31 cases per surgeon compared with five for non-hand fellowship–trained surgeons. They also improved outcomes in rates of infection, wound dehiscence, and overall complications. Rates of nerve injury or recurrence showed no statistical difference. This held true for the open release subset. Endoscopically, fellowship-trained surgeons had only improved rates of overall complications.

Conclusion Surgeons undergoing additional hand fellowship training may show improved outcomes in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. However, no effect was seen on nerve injury or recurrence of symptoms.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hammond JW, Queale WS, Kim TK, McFarland EG. Surgeon experience and clinical and economic outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (12) 2318-2324
  • 2 Dasenbrock HH, Clarke MJ, Witham TF, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. The impact of provider volume on the outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (06) 1346-1353
  • 3 Kohn GP, Galanko JA, Overby DW, Farrell TM. High case volumes and surgical fellowships are associated with improved outcomes for bariatric surgery patients: a justification of current credentialing initiatives for practice and training. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (06) 909-918
  • 4 Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, MacDonald R, Kane RL. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol 2008; 180 (03) 828-829
  • 5 Nayak JG, Drachenberg DE, Mau E. et al. The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. BMC Urol 2014; 14: 82
  • 6 McKay A, You I, Bigam D. et al. Impact of surgeon training on outcomes after resective hepatic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15 (05) 1348-1355
  • 7 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282 (02) 153-158
  • 8 Fajardo M, Kim SH, Szabo RM. Incidence of carpal tunnel release: trends and implications within the United States ambulatory care setting. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (08) 1599-1605
  • 9 Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999; 125 (03) 250-256
  • 10 Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M. et al. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2016; 263 (04) 664-672
  • 11 Cowan Jr JA, Dimick JB, Thompson BG, Stanley JC, Upchurch Jr GR. Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195 (06) 814-821
  • 12 Golledge J, Wiggins JE, Callam MJ. Effect of surgical sub-specialization on breast cancer outcome. Br J Surg 2000; 87 (10) 1420-1425
  • 13 Dorrance HR, Docherty GM, O'Dwyer PJ. Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (04) 492-498
  • 14 Agnew SP, Dumanian GA. A simple test: please draw the incision. It is not as easy as we may think. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (10) 1894-1898