Am J Perinatol 2020; 37(01): 112-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400994
SMFM 2019
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Abbott ARCHITECT Syphilis TP Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Accurately Diagnoses Past or Current Syphilis in Pregnancy

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Ithiel J. Frame
2   Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
3   Department of Pathology, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
,
Emilie Hill
2   Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
3   Department of Pathology, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
,
Rizwana Fatabhoy
3   Department of Pathology, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
,
Amanda L. Strickland
2   Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
3   Department of Pathology, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
,
Dominick Cavuoti
2   Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Donald D. McIntire
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Rita M. Hollaway
2   Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

09 August 2019

28 October 2019

Publication Date:
06 January 2020 (online)

Abstract

Objective We evaluate diagnostic accuracy of the ARCHITECT chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) screening test in pregnancy, and evaluate pregnancy outcomes among screen-positive women.

Study Design Samples from routine prenatal rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests were collected between June 22 and August 18, 2017 and frozen. Samples were batch-tested with the Abbott ARCHITECT syphilis TP immunoassay (CIA, index test). We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and false positivity. We compared pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among screen-positive women.

Results Of 1,602 specimens, 35 (2.2%) were RPR + ; of those, 24 (69%) were CIA +/Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA)+ and 11 (31%) were CIA-/TPPA-. Of 1,567 RPR- specimens, 14 (0.9%) were CIA + ; of those, 13 (93%) were TPPA + , and one (7%) had a false positive CIA test. Sensitivity of the CIA (95% CI) was 100% (90.5–100%), specificity 99.9% (99.6–100%), positive predictive value 97.4% (86.2–99.9%), and false positive rate 0.06% (0.002–0.4%) for current or past syphilis. Among 37 CIA +/TPPA+ women, seven (19%) had RPR-negative status (Group 1), 11 (30%) had previously treated syphilis (Group 2), and 19 (51%) had active infection (Group 3). One stillbirth occurred in a woman with early, active syphilis identified at delivery; no adverse perinatal outcomes occurred among women in Groups 1 or 2.

Conclusion The ARCHITECT syphilis TP immunoassay accurately diagnoses current or past syphilis in pregnancy. Clinical history and staging remain essential using a reverse algorithm.

Note

This study was presented in poster format at the 39th Annual Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting held in Las Vegas, Nevada, Feb 11–16, 2019. Abbott Diagnostics provided reagents for the Architect syphilis TP chemiluminescence immunoassay free of charge. Ramani Wonderling and Ollie Hopkins, who were employees of Abbott Diagnostics at the time of the study, provided assistance with the initial sample size calculation free of charge. Internal funding supported the data collection, final statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation for this study.


Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2017. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018
  • 2 Bowen V, Su J, Torrone E, Kidd S, Weinstock H. Increase in incidence of congenital syphilis - United States, 2012-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64 (44) 1241-1245
  • 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Workowski KA, Berman SM. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64 (RR-3): 1-140
  • 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening–five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60 (05) 133-137
  • 5 Mmeje O, Chow JM, Davidson L, Shieh J, Schapiro JM, Park IU. Discordant syphilis immunoassays in pregnancy: perinatal outcomes and implications for clinical management. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61 (07) 1049-1053
  • 6 Li Z, Feng Z, Liu P, Yan C. Screening for antibodies against Treponema pallidum with chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and clinical characterization. Ann Clin Biochem 2016; 53 (Pt 5): 588-592
  • 7 Mishra S, Boily MC, Ng V. , et al. The laboratory impact of changing syphilis screening from the rapid-plasma reagin to a treponemal enzyme immunoassay: a case-study from the Greater Toronto Area. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38 (03) 190-196
  • 8 Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE. , et al; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351: h5527
  • 9 Kimberlin DW, Brady MT, Jackson MA. , eds. Syphilis. In: Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 31st ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018: 773-788
  • 10 Association of Public Health Laboratories. Consultation on Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis: Meeting Summary Report. 2018. Available at: https://www.aphl.org/aboutAPHL/publications/Documents/ID-2018Aug-Syphilis-Meeting-Report.pdf . Accessed January 8 2019
  • 11 Tinajeros F, Grossman D, Richmond K. , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care syphilis test when used among pregnant women in Bolivia. Sex Transm Infect 2006; 82 (Suppl. 05) v17-v21
  • 12 Park IU, Chow JM, Bolan G, Stanley M, Shieh J, Schapiro JM. Screening for syphilis with the treponemal immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and implications for clinical management. J Infect Dis 2011; 204 (09) 1297-1304
  • 13 Gratrix J, Plitt S, Lee BE. , et al. Impact of reverse sequence syphilis screening on new diagnoses of late latent syphilis in Edmonton, Canada. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39 (07) 528-530
  • 14 Peterman TA, Newman DR, Davis D, Su JR. Do women with persistently negative nontreponemal test results transmit syphilis during pregnancy?. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 (04) 311-315
  • 15 Fakile YF, Jost H, Hoover KW. , et al. Correlation of treponemal immunoassay signal strength values with reactivity of confirmatory treponemal testing. J Clin Microbiol 2017; 56 (01) e01165-e17
  • 16 Arora N, Schuenemann VJ, Jäger G. , et al. Origin of modern syphilis and emergence of a pandemic Treponema pallidum cluster. Nat Microbiol 2016; 2: 16245
  • 17 Gogarten JF, Düx A, Schuenemann VJ. , et al. Tools for opening new chapters in the book of Treponema pallidum evolutionary history. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22 (11) 916-921
  • 18 Pinto M, Borges V, Antelo M. , et al. Genome-scale analysis of the non-cultivable Treponema pallidum reveals extensive within-patient genetic variation. Nat Microbiol 2016; 2: 16190
  • 19 Buono SA, Basurto-Davila R, Godwin HA, Green NM. Economic assessment of reverse algorithm syphilis screening in a high prevalence population. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45 (12) 834-841