Download PDF
Synlett 2021; 32(04): 329-336
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1707326
synpacts

Designing the Secondary Coordination Sphere in Small-Molecule Catalysis

Authors

  • Inbal L. Zak‡

  • Santosh C. Gadekar‡

  • Anat Milo  ∗

    Department of Chemistry, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1193/17). I. L. Z. gratefully acknowledges the BGU Faculty of Natural Sciences for an MSc excellence fellowship. S.C.G. gratefully acknowledges the Kreitman School of Advanced Graduate Studies, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev for a postdoctoral fellowship.
Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category


Graphical Abstract

Preview

Corrected by:

Erratum - Designing the Secondary Coordination Sphere in Small-Molecule CatalysisSynlett 2024; 35(07): 832-832
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1763761

Abstract

The application of secondary-sphere interactions in catalysis was inspired by the hierarchical arrangement of the microenvironment of metalloprotein active sites and has been adopted mainly in organometallic catalysis. The study of such interactions has enabled the deliberate orientation of reaction components, leading to control over reactivity and selectivity by design. Although not as common, such interaction can play a decisive role in organocatalysis. Herein, we present several examples of small-molecule organometallic- and organocatalysis, highlighting the advantages offered by carefully designing the secondary sphere.

1 Introduction

2 Secondary-Sphere Design in Organometallic Catalysis

3 Secondary-Sphere Modification in Organocatalysis

4 Using Statistical Analysis to Systematically Tune and Probe Secondary-Sphere Interactions

5 Conclusion

Key words

secondary coordination sphere - noncovalent interactions - hydrogen bonds - organometallics - organocatalysis


Publication History

Received: 24 August 2020

Accepted after revision: 15 September 2020

Article published online:
12 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Toste FD, Sigman MS, Miller SJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017; 50: 609
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Davis HJ, Phipps RJ. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 864
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Leenders SH. A. M, Gramage-Doria R, De Bruin B, Reek JN. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 433
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bone R, Silen JL, Agard DA. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990; 23: 120
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Borovik AS. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005; 38: 54
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cook SA, Borovik AS. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 2407
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Lucas RL, Zart MK, Murkerjee J, Sorrell TN, Powell DR, Borovik AS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 15476
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Matson EM, Bertke JA, Fout AR. Inorg. Chem. 2014; 53: 4450
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ford CL, Park YJ, Matson EM, Gordon Z, Fout AR. Science 2016; 354: 741
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Breslow R, Zhang B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 8495
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Breslow R, Huang Y, Zhang X, Yang J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997; 94: 11156
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Frost JR, Huber SM, Breitenlechner S, Bannwarth C, Bach T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 691
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Olivo G, Fairnelli G, Barbieri A, Lanzalunga O, Di Stefano S, Costas M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 16347
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Das S, Incarvito CD, Crabtree RH, Brudvig GW. Science 2006; 312: 1941
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Gellrich U, Huang J, Seiche W, Keller M, Meuwly M, Breit B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 964
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Fuchs D, Rousseau G, Diab L, Gellrich U, Breit B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 2178
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kuninobu Y, Ida H, Nishi M, Kanai M. Nat. Chem. 2015; 7: 712
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Davis HJ, Mihai MT, Phipps RJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 12759
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Han Z, Li P, Zhang Z, Chen C, Wang Q, Dong X.-Q, Zhang X. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 6214
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Voss F, Herdtweck E, Bach T. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 2137
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Neel AJ, Hilton MJ, Sigman MS, Toste FD. Nature 2017; 543: 637
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Jung H, Schrader M, Kim D, Baik M.-H, Park Y, Chang S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 15356
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Reichardt C. Chem. Rev. 1994; 94: 2319
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Smithrud DB, Diederich F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 339
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Cubberley MS, Iverson BL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 7560
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Clarke ML, Fuentes JA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 930
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Fuentes JA, Lebl T, Slawin AM. Z, Clarke ML. Chem. Sci. 2011; 2: 1997
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Lewis CA, Gustafson JL, Chiu A, Balsells J, Pollard D, Murry J, Reamer RA, Hansen KB, Miller SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 16358
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Gustafson JL, Sigman MS, Miller SJ. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 2794
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Siegel JB, Zanghellini A, Lovick HM, Kiss G, Lambert AR, St Clair JL, Gallaher JL, Hilvert D, Gelb MH, Stoddard BL, Houk KN, Michael FE, Baker D. Science 2010; 329: 309
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Dantas G, Kuhlman B, Callender D, Wong M, Baker D. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 332: 449
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Zanghellini A, Jiang L, Wollacott AM, Cheng G, Meiler J, Althoff EA, Röthlisberger D, Baker D. Protein Sci. 2006; 15: 2785
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Dhayalan V, Gadekar SC, Alassad Z, Milo A. Nat. Chem. 2019; 11: 543
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Baragwanath L, Rose CA, Zeitler K, Connon SJ. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 9214
    Search in Google Scholar