Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(14): 1519-1525
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713864
Original Article

Receipt of Proton-Pump Inhibitors during Pregnancy and Risk for Preeclampsia

Natalie A. Bello
1   Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Yongmei Huang
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Sbaa K. Syeda
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Jason D. Wright
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Mary E. D'Alton
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Alexander M. Friedman
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to determine whether receiving a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) prescription during pregnancy was associated with decreased risk for preeclampsia.

Study Design The Truven Health MarketScan database was used to determine whether receiving a PPI prescription was associated with risk for preeclampsia. Risk for preeclampsia was evaluated based on the presence or absence of receiving a PPI prescription (1) any time during pregnancy, and 2) individually during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters. In addition to evaluating risk for all preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia and preterm severe preeclampsia were evaluated. Adjusted models including risk factors such as chronic hypertension, maternal age, multiple gestation, and diabetes were performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] as measures of effect.

Results A total of 2,755,885 women were included in the analysis of whom 69,249 were prescribed a PPI during pregnancy (2.5%). In adjusted models, receiving a PPI prescription anytime during pregnancy (aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.24–1.32), the 1st trimester (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04–1.22), the 2nd trimester (aRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15–1.26), and the 3rd trimester (aRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.35–1.47) were all associated with increased risk for preeclampsia. Risk for severe preeclampsia was also significantly increased with receiving a PPI prescription anytime during pregnancy (aRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.15–1.27), during the 2nd trimester (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23), and during the 3rd trimester (aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.24–1.43), but not the first trimester (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92–1.19). Evaluating the risk for preterm severe preeclampsia, adjusted risk was significantly increased with receiving a PPI prescription in the second trimester (aRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.21–1.52) but not the first trimester (aRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86–1.32).

Conclusion In this analysis of payer data, receiving a PPI prescription during pregnancy was not associated with decreased risk for preeclampsia. Further empiric research is required to determine whether an effect may be present.

Key Points

  • Proton pump inhibitors were not associated with decreased risk for preeclampsia.

  • Proton pump inhibitors were not associated with decreased risk for severe preterm preeclampsia.

  • Proton pump inhibitors are commonly prescribed during pregnancy.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 11 April 2020

Accepted: 26 May 2020

Article published online:
03 July 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (01) 36.e1-36.e5 , discussion 91–92, e7–e11
  • 2 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (01) e1-e25
  • 3 Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC. et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 (07) 613-622
  • 4 Duley L, Meher S, Hunter KE, Seidler AL, Askie LM. Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 2019. (10) CD004659
  • 5 Hoffman MK, Goudar SS, Kodkany BS. et al. ASPIRIN Study Group. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preterm delivery in nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy (ASPIRIN): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395 (10220): 285-293
  • 6 Hastie R, Bergman L, Cluver CA. et al. Proton pump inhibitors and preeclampsia risk among 157 720 women. Hypertension 2019; 73 (05) 1097-1103
  • 7 Onda K, Tong S, Beard S. et al. Proton pump inhibitors decrease soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and soluble endoglin secretion, decrease hypertension, and rescue endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension 2017; 69 (03) 457-468
  • 8 Kaitu'u-Lino TJ, Brownfoot FC, Beard S. et al. Combining metformin and esomeprazole is additive in reducing sFlt-1 secretion and decreasing endothelial dysfunction—implications for treating preeclampsia. PLoS One 2018; 13 (02) e0188845
  • 9 Shafik AN, Khattab MA, Osman AH. Magnesium sulfate versus esomeprazole impact on the neonates of preeclamptic rats. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 225: 236-242
  • 10 Saleh L, Samantar R, Garrelds IM, van den Meiracker AH, Visser W, Danser AHJ. Low soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, endoglin, and endothelin-1 levels in women with confirmed or suspected preeclampsia using proton pump inhibitors. Hypertension 2017; 70 (03) 594-600
  • 11 Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C. et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (07) 672-683
  • 12 Cluver CA, Hannan NJ, van Papendorp E. et al. Esomeprazole to treat women with preterm preeclampsia: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219 (04) 388.e1-388.e17
  • 13 The Truven Health MarketScan databases for life sciences researchers. Accessed February 15, 2020 at: https://truvenhealth.com/Portals/0/Assets/2017-MarketScan-Databases-Life-Sciences-Researchers-WP.pdf
  • 14 Kuklina EV, Whiteman MK, Hillis SD. et al. An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity. Matern Child Health J 2008; 12 (04) 469-477
  • 15 Margulis AV, Setoguchi S, Mittleman MA, Glynn RJ, Dormuth CR, Hernández-Díaz S. Algorithms to estimate the beginning of pregnancy in administrative databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2013; 22 (01) 16-24
  • 16 Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Schembri ME, Keyzer JM, Gilbert WM. Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194 (04) 992-1001
  • 17 Grimes DA. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (05) 1018-1019
  • 18 Grimes DA. Epidemiologic research with administrative databases: red herrings, false alarms and pseudo-epidemics. Hum Reprod 2015; 30 (08) 1749-1752