Performance of Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Children

Abstract

Accuracy of delirium diagnosis in mechanically ventilated children is often limited by their varying developmental abilities. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) scale in these patients. This is a single-center, prospective, observational study of patients requiring sedation and mechanical ventilation for 2 days or more. CAPD scale was implemented in our unit for delirium screening. Each CAPD assessment was accompanied by a physician assessment using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) criteria. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the best cut-off score in our target population. We also evaluated ways to improve the accuracy of this scale in patients with and without developmental delay. A total of 837 paired assessments were performed. Prevalence of delirium was 19%. Overall, CAPD score ≥ 9 had sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 44.8%. Among typically developed patients, the sensitivity and specificity were 76.7 and 65.4%, respectively, whereas specificity was only 16.5% for developmentally delayed patients. The best cut-off value for CAPD was 9 for typically developed children and 17 for those with developmental delay (sensitivity 74.4%, specificity 63.2%). Some CAPD questions do not apply to patients with sensory and neurocognitive deficits; upon excluding those questions, the best cut-off values were 5 for typically developed and 6 for developmentally delayed children. In mechanically ventilated patients with developmental delay, CAPD ≥ 9 led to a high false-positive rate. This emphasizes the need for either a different cut-off score or development of a delirium scale specific to this patient population.

Keywords

pediatric - delirium - developmental delay - sensitivity - specificity

Publication History

Received: 01 March 2021

Accepted: 15 March 2021

Article published online:
03 June 2021

• References

• 1 Traube C, Silver G, Kearney J. et al. Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU. Crit Care Med 2014; 42 (03) 656-663
• 2 Smith HAB, Boyd J, Fuchs DC. et al. Diagnosing delirium in critically ill children: validity and reliability of the Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Med 2011; 39 (01) 150-157
• 3 Silver G, Traube C, Gerber LM. et al. Pediatric delirium and associated risk factors: a single-center prospective observational study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16 (04) 303-309
• 4 Smith HA, Gangopadhyay M, Goben CM. et al. The Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU: valid and reliable delirium monitoring for critically ill infants and children. Crit Care Med 2016; 44 (03) 592-600
• 5 Smith HA, Brink E, Fuchs DC, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP. Pediatric delirium: monitoring and management in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Clin North Am 2013; 60 (03) 741-760
• 6 Creten C, Van Der Zwaan S, Blankespoor RJ, Leroy PL, Schieveld JN. Pediatric delirium in the pediatric intensive care unit: a systematic review and an update on key issues and research questions. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77 (11) 1099-1107
• 7 Traube C, Silver G, Reeder RW. et al. Delirium in critically ill children: an international point prevalence study. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (04) 584-590
• 8 Smith HAB, Gangopadhyay M, Goben CM. et al. Delirium and benzodiazepines associated with prolonged ICU stay in critically ill infants and young children. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (09) 1427-1435
• 9 Kaur S, Silver G, Samuels S. et al. Delirium and developmental disability: improving specificity of a pediatric delirium screen. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21 (05) 409-414
• 10 Valdivia HR, Carlin KE. Determining interrater reliability of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium screening tool among PICU nurses. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20 (04) e216-e220
• 11 Daoud A, Duff JP, Joffe AR. Alberta Sepsis Network. Diagnostic accuracy of delirium diagnosis in pediatric intensive care: a systematic review. Crit Care 2014; 18 (05) 489
• 12 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. 5th ed.. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013
• 13 Smith HAB, Williams S, Griffith K, Fuchs C. Pediatric delirium. Accessed July 12, 2018 at: http://www.icudelirium.org/pediatric.html
• 14 Gong ZP, Liu XW, Zhuang YY. et al. Survey of attitudes and behaviors of healthcare professionals on delirium in ICU. Chin J Traumatol 2009; 12 (06) 328-333
• 15 Kudchadkar SR, Yaster M, Punjabi NM. Sedation, sleep promotion, and delirium screening practices in the care of mechanically ventilated children: a wake-up call for the pediatric critical care community. Crit Care Med 2014; 42 (07) 1592-1600
• 16 Gupta N, Woolley A, Talathi S, Davlyatov G, Colston C, Hayes L. Opioid use is associated with ICU delirium in mechanically ventilated children. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures) 2020; 6 (03) 167-174
• 17 Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale. Anesthesiology 2004; 100 (05) 1138-1145
• 18 Dosman CF, Andrews D, Goulden KJ. Evidence-based milestone ages as a framework for developmental surveillance. Paediatr Child Health 2012; 17 (10) 561-568
• 19 Silver G, Kearney J, Traube C, Atkinson TM, Wyka KE, Walkup J. Pediatric delirium: evaluating the gold standard. Palliat Support Care 2015; 13 (03) 513-516
• 20 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed.. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
• 21 Meagher DJ, Morandi A, Inouye SK. et al. Concordance between DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for delirium diagnosis in a pooled database of 768 prospectively evaluated patients using the delirium rating scale-revised-98. BMC Med 2014; 12 (01) 164