Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(01): 057-061
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729159
Original Article

Food Insecurity in an Urban Pregnancy Cohort

Kirby Sullivan
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Meghan St John
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Emily DeFranco
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Department of Pediatrics, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Elizabeth Kelly 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Department of Pediatrics, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding K.S. was supported in part by NIH grant T35DK06044. E.K. received funding support from the Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Food insecurity is a prominent problem and has been implicated in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aims to describe the food insecure population in an urban academic health center perinatal cohort.

Study Design We enrolled 451 postpartum inpatients at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center who completed a questionnaire and were then categorized as food insecure based on U.S. Department of Agriculture standardized survey questions. Generalized linear models estimated the relative influence of maternal characteristics on food insecurity.

Results Among the study population (n = 426), 18.6% (95% confidence interval: 15.2–22.4%) were classified as food insecure. Factors with increased adjusted relative risk on food insecurity include annual household income <$40,000, obesity, and smoking. Food insecure women also reported lower levels of love, satisfaction, and joy, and higher levels of despair.

Conclusion We recommend the use of a validated screening tool on all pregnant women with the associated psychosocial stressors and social determinants of health.

Key Points

  • Food insecurity is prevalent among pregnant women.

  • Nearly one in five women (18.6%) in the study cohort were classified as food insecure.

  • Food insecure pregnant women were more likely to have additional risks for adverse health outcomes.

Keywords

food security - food insecurity - pregnancy - social determinants

Note

This study was presented at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's Annual Pregnancy Meeting, February 3–8, 2020, Gaylord, TX.




Publication History

Received: 16 August 2020

Accepted: 02 March 2021

Article published online:
02 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. Accessed April 15, 2021 at: www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1
    PubMed
  • 2 Coleman-Jensen A, Gregory C. Definitions of food security. Definitions of food security. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Accessed January 7, 2020 at: www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/definitions-of-food-security.aspx
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Coleman-Jensen A, Nord M, Singh A. Household food security in the United States in 2012, ERR-155. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, September 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ivers LC, Cullen KA. Food insecurity: special considerations for women. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94 (06) 1740S-1744S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Carmichael SL, Yang W, Herring A, Abrams B, Shaw GM. Maternal food insecurity is associated with increased risk of certain birth defects. J Nutr 2007; 137 (09) 2087-2092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Gundersen C. Household food insecurity is associated with self-reported pregravid weight status, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy complications. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110 (05) 692-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nettle D, Andrews C, Bateson M. Food insecurity as a driver of obesity in humans: The insurance hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 2017; 40: e105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Borders AE, Grobman WA, Amsden LB, Holl JL. Chronic stress and low birth weight neonates in a low-income population of women. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (2 Pt 1): 331-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Interact for Health. 1 in 4 adults in our region report being food insecure. Accessed April 15, 2021 at: https://www.interactforhealth.org/whats-new/76/1-in-4-adults-in-our-region-report-being-food-insecure/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Abdu J, Kahssay M, Gebremedhin M. Household food insecurity, underweight status, and associated characteristics among women of reproductive age group in Assayita District, Afar Regional State, Ethiopia. J Environ Public Health 2018; 2018: 7659204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schrock JM, McClure HH, Snodgrass JJ. et al. Food insecurity partially mediates associations between social disadvantage and body composition among older adults in india: results from the study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Am J Hum Biol 2017; 29 (06) e23033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Laraia B, Vinikoor-Imler LC, Siega-Riz AM. Food insecurity during pregnancy leads to stress, disordered eating, and greater postpartum weight among overweight women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015; 23 (06) 1303-1311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Morales ME, Epstein MH, Marable DE, Oo SA, Berkowitz SA. Food insecurity and cardiovascular health in pregnant women: results from the Food for Families Program, Chelsea, Massachusetts, 2013-2015. Prev Chronic Dis 2016; 13: E152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Herman DR, Harrison GG, Afifi AA, Jenks E. The effect of the WIC program on food security status of pregnant, first-time participants. Fam Econ Rev 2004; 16 (01) 21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar