Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2023; 33(05): 354-359
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758155
Original Article

Caudal Block versus Wound Infiltration for Inguinal Procedures in Young Children: A Randomized Clinical Study

Sabine Zundel
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, Luzern, Switzerland
,
Franziska Conz
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Jörg Fuchs
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Gunnar Blumenstock
3   Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Aida Guerrero-Rodrigues
4   Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Eberhard Karls Universitat Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
,
Christian Grasshoff
4   Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Eberhard Karls Universitat Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
,
Barbara Schlisio
4   Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Eberhard Karls Universitat Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Inguinal procedures in children are frequent and typically performed in an outpatient setting. We aimed to analyze whether there is a difference in postoperative pain scores and setup time (start of anesthesia management to incision time) when comparing caudal block (CB) with local wound infiltration.

Materials and Methods We enrolled pediatric outpatients scheduled for inguinal procedures. Patients were randomized to receive either preincision CBs or end-of-procedure local wound infiltration. Postoperative pain scores until 24 hours postoperatively and setup time were analyzed.

Results Fifty-two patients were included in the study. Thirty patients received a CB, and 22 patients received local infiltration (LI). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores. Setup time was significantly higher in the CB group: median 22.5 minutes IQR (16–46 minutes) compared with 17 minutes in the LI group IQR (10–35 minutes), p-value of 0.0026.

Conclusion Both CB and LI result in good postoperative pain control after inguinal procedures in pediatric outpatients. Since LI is less time consuming and has lower risks for complications, we recommend this technique for inguinal procedures in pediatric outpatients. Our findings will need to be confirmed in larger cohorts, but we believe the evidence generated with this study has the potential to positively influence patient care, operating room efficiency, and costs.

Keywords

caudal block - pediatric inguinal procedures - local infiltration - postoperative pain - setup time


Publication History

Received: 28 June 2022

Accepted: 06 September 2022

Article published online:
31 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Emhardt JD, Saysana C, Sirichotvithyakorn P. Anesthetic considerations for pediatric outpatient surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 2004; 13 (03) 210-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wiegele M, Marhofer P, Lönnqvist P-A. Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations. Br J Anaesth 2019; 122 (04) 509-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shanthanna H, Singh B, Guyatt G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudal block as compared to noncaudal regional techniques for inguinal surgeries in children. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 890626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baird R, Guilbault MP, Tessier R, Ansermino JM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudal blockade versus alternative analgesic strategies for pediatric inguinal hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (05) 1077-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cheon JK, Park CH, Hwang KT, Choi BY. A comparison between caudal block versus splash block for postoperative analgesia following inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011; 60 (04) 255-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Conroy JM, Othersen Jr HB, Dorman BH, Gottesman JD, Wallace CT, Brahen NH. A comparison of wound instillation and caudal block for analgesia following pediatric inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28 (04) 565-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fell D, Derrington MC, Taylor E, Wandless JG. Paediatric postoperative analgesia. A comparison between caudal block and wound infiltration of local anaesthetic. Anaesthesia 1988; 43 (02) 107-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Machotta A, Risse A, Bercker S, Streich R, Pappert D. Comparison between instillation of bupivacaine versus caudal analgesia for postoperative analgesia following inguinal herniotomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13 (05) 397-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schindler M, Swann M, Crawford M. A comparison of postoperative analgesia provided by wound infiltration or caudal analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19 (01) 46-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Eeson G, Birabwa-Male D, Pennington M, Blair GK. Costs and cost-effectiveness of pediatric inguinal hernia repair in Uganda. World J Surg 2015; 39 (02) 343-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?. Pain 2003; 105 (1–2): 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Büttner W, Finke W. Analysis of behavioural and physiological parameters for the assessment of postoperative analgesic demand in newborns, infants and young children: a comprehensive report on seven consecutive studies. Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10 (03) 303-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 1988; 14 (01) 9-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zernikow B, Hechler T. Pain therapy in children and adolescents. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008;105(28-29):511–521, quiz 521–522
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gavrilovska-Brzanov A, Kuzmanovska B, Kartalov A. et al. Evaluation of anesthesia profile in pediatric patients after inguinal hernia repair with caudal block or local wound infiltration. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2016; 4 (01) 89-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27 (04) 485-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8 (12) 1153-1157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Garra G, Singer AJ, Domingo A, Thode Jr HC. The Wong-Baker pain FACES scale measures pain, not fear. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013; 29 (01) 17-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Merkel S, Tait AR. Behavioral pain assessment and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability instrument. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2003; 3 (03) 317-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology 2004; 100 (05) 1138-1145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Öksüz G, Arslan M, Urfalıoğlu A. et al. Comparison of quadratus lumborum block and caudal block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair and orchiopexy surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45 (03) 187-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kesici S, Demirci M, Kesici U. Bacterial inhibition efficiency of prilocaine and bupivacaine. Int Wound J 2019; 16 (05) 1185-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pere P, Lindgren L, Vaara M. Poor antibacterial effect of ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1999; 91 (03) 884-886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rosenberg PH, Renkonen OV. Antimicrobial activity of bupivacaine and morphine. Anesthesiology 1985; 62 (02) 178-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ivani G, Bergendahl HT, Lampugnani E. et al. Plasma levels of clonidine following epidural bolus injection in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42 (03) 306-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar