Development and Optimization of a Remote Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Bootcamp Using Telesimulation

Abstract

We developed a novel cardiac critical care bootcamp consisting of didactic, small group, and simulation sessions. The bootcamp was remote due to the COVID-19 pandemic and included telesimulation. We aimed to assess learners' reactions to the bootcamp and their perception of telesimulation. Paired anonymous surveys were administered before and after participation. Surveys assessed participants' comfort in independently managing cardiac critical care scenarios, perceptions of telesimulation, barriers to its effectiveness, and specific feedback on course components. Forty-three fellows from 10 institutions joined the bootcamp over 2 years. Thirty-eight pre- and 28 postcourse surveys were completed. The course was rated good or excellent by all respondents, and 27/28 rated the material as appropriate to their level of training. Based on feedback from 2020, the electrophysiology sessions were converted to a small group format in 2021; positive assessment of these sessions improved from 65 to 90–100%. The telesimulations were highly rated, with 83–94% of participants in 2020 and 90–100% in 2021 rating them as good or excellent. Participants' views on telesimulation improved following the course, with 78% (14/18) post- versus 50% preparticipation agreeing that telesimulation is an effective educational tool (p = 0.06) and 56% (10/18) post- versus 67% (12/18) pre-rating telesimulation as less effective than in person simulation (p = 0.04). Identified limitations of telesimulation were limited active participation, lack of realism, impaired flow of conversation, and audiovisual and technical concerns. Telesimulation is feasible in cardiac critical care education and was an acceptable alternative to in person simulation for course participants.

Keywords

telesimulation - pediatric cardiac critical care - bootcamp

Publication History

Received: 15 June 2022

Accepted: 18 February 2023

Article published online:
30 March 2023

• References

• 1 Nishisaki A, Hales R, Biagas K. et al. A multi-institutional high-fidelity simulation “boot camp” orientation and training program for first year pediatric critical care fellows. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009; 10 (02) 157-162
• 2 Maskatia SA, Cabrera AG, Morris SA, Altman CA. The pediatric echocardiography Boot Camp: four-year experience and impact on clinical performance. Echocardiography 2017; 34 (10) 1486-1494
• 3 Ceresnak SR, Axelrod DM, Sacks LD, Motonaga KS, Johnson ER, Krawczeski CD. Advances in pediatric cardiology boot camp: boot camp training promotes fellowship readiness and enables retention of knowledge. Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38 (03) 631-640
• 4 Ceresnak SR, Axelrod DM, Motonaga KS, Johnson ER, Krawczeski CD. Pediatric cardiology boot camp: description and evaluation of a novel intensive training program for pediatric cardiology trainees. Pediatr Cardiol 2016; 37 (05) 834-844
• 5 Kumar D, Vachharajani AJ, Wertheimer F. et al; Organization of Neonatal Training Program Directors Task Force on Simulation. Boot camps in neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship programs: a national survey. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2019; 12 (02) 231-237
• 6 Blackmore C, Austin J, Lopushinsky SR, Donnon T. Effects of postgraduate medical education “boot camps” on clinical skills, knowledge, and confidence: a meta-analysis. J Grad Med Educ 2014; 6 (04) 643-652
• 7 Allan CK, Tannous P, DeWitt E. et al. A pediatric cardiology fellowship boot camp improves trainee confidence. Cardiol Young 2016; 26 (08) 1514-1521
• 8 Horak RV, Griffin JF, Brown AM. et al; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigator's (PALISI) Network. Growth and changing characteristics of pediatric intensive care 2001-2016. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (08) 1135-1142
• 9 Horak RV, Alexander PM, Amirnovin R. et al. Pediatric cardiac intensive care distribution, service delivery, and staffing in the United States in 2018. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21 (09) 797-803
• 10 McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Alrabah R, Yarris LM. Telesimulation: an innovative tool for health professions education. AEM Educ Train 2017; 1 (02) 132-136
• 11 Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos MG, Hanrahan JG, Janga D, Dedeilias P, Sideris M. Medical and surgical education challenges and innovations in the COVID-19 era: A systematic review. In Vivo 2020; 34: 1603-1611
• 12 Burns R, Wenger J. A remotely conducted paediatric bootcamp for fourth-year medical students. Med Educ 2020; 54 (07) 668-669
• 13 Ohta K, Kurosawa H, Shiima Y. et al. The effectiveness of remote facilitation in simulation-based pediatric resuscitation training for medical students. Pediatr Emerg Care 2017; 33 (08) 564-569
• 14 Patel SM, Miller CR, Schiavi A, Toy S, Schwengel DA. The sim must go on: adapting resident education to the COVID-19 pandemic using telesimulation. Adv Simul (Lond) 2020; 5 (01) 26
• 15 Delisle M, Hannenberg AA. Alternatives to high-fidelity simulation. Anesthesiol Clin 2020; 38 (04) 761-773
• 16 Brown KM, Mudd SS, Hunt EA. et al. A multi-institutional simulation boot camp for pediatric cardiac critical care nurse practitioners. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2018; 19 (06) 564-571
• 17 Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS. . A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman; 2001
• 18 Diaz MCG, Walsh BM. Telesimulation-based education during COVID-19. Clin Teach 2021; 18 (02) 121-125
• 19 Delisle M, Ward MAR, Pradarelli JC, Panda N, Howard JD, Hannenberg AA. comparing the learning effectiveness of healthcare simulation in the observer versus active role: systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 2019; 14 (05) 318-332
• 20 Hayden EM, Khatri A, Kelly HR, Yager PH, Salazar GM. Mannequin-based telesimulation: increasing access to simulation-based education. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25 (02) 144-147