Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786546
Original Article

Antenatal Breast Milk Expression Survey of Individuals Whose Pregnancy Was Complicated by Diabetes: Exploring Knowledge, Perceptions, Experiences, and Milk Volume Expressed

Sarah Mess
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Erwin Cabacungan
2   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was supported partially by 1R01HD108194 (PI: A.P.).

Abstract

Objective Antenatal breast milk expression (ABE) offers a host of benefits, including reduced formula consumption, support for breastfeeding success, and increased maternal satisfaction. Despite these advantages, experience with ABE differs significantly, often leading to anxiety over perceived inadequate milk supply and eventual breastfeeding cessation. This study comprehensively evaluates the knowledge, attitudes, and real-world experiences of individuals with gestational or pregestational diabetes concerning ABE, with a focus on total milk volume expressed prior to birth.

Study Design Utilizing a convenience sampling method, we surveyed individuals with gestational or pregestational diabetes from three health care facilities who were trained in ABE. Knowledge and perceptions were gauged through presurvey statements, while postsurvey statements were employed to measure experiences, both using a 5-point Likert scale. In parallel, a retrospective study assessed both maternal and infant outcomes among the same participant pool. Statistical comparisons between individuals with and without reservations were made using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum, Mann–Whitney, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests.

Results Of the 138 participants, 75% completed both survey segments, and 61% expressed reservations about ABE. Both groups were demographically similar and showed comparable newborn outcomes. However, individuals with reservations experienced heightened pain during ABE, reported lesser lactation support, and were less willing to repeat the process compared to those individuals without reservations. The median total ABE volume was significantly lower by 14 mL among those with reservations (7 vs. 21 mL, p = 0.009). Although both groups demonstrated improved attitudes toward the utility of ABE for individuals with gestational or pregestational diabetes, no significant shift occurred in the perception of ABE difficulty.

Conclusion Our results indicate that individuals with gestational or pregestational diabetes who have reservations about ABE face unique challenges and tend to express lower milk volumes. This underlines the need for specialized interventions and ongoing research to address antenatal lactation support and alleviate ABE-related concerns among individuals with gestational or pregestational diabetes.

Key Points

  • Reservations of ABE were associated with reduced milk volumes.

  • Regardless of reservations, ABE was felt to be beneficial.

  • Our results underscore the need for more ABE education for those with reservations.

Note

The findings of this study were presented in part during the 53rd Annual Wisconsin Association of Perinatal Care Conference in Lake Elkhart, WI on October 10'th, 2023.


Authors' Contributions

Each author has indicated that they have met the journal's requirements for authorship.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 01 March 2024

Accepted: 05 April 2024

Article published online:
09 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Meek JY, Noble L. Section on Breastfeeding. Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2022; 150 (01) e2022057988
  • 2 Abraham M, Lak MA, Gurz D, Nolasco FOM, Kondraju PK, Iqbal J. A narrative review of breastfeeding and its correlation with breast cancer: current understanding and outcomes. Cureus 2023; 15 (08) e44081
  • 3 Dogaru CM, Nyffenegger D, Pescatore AM, Spycher BD, Kuehni CE. Breastfeeding and childhood asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 179 (10) 1153-1167
  • 4 Xu L, Lochhead P, Ko Y, Claggett B, Leong RW, Ananthakrishnan AN. Systematic review with meta-analysis: breastfeeding and the risk of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017; 46 (09) 780-789
  • 5 Qiao J, Dai LJ, Zhang Q, Ouyang YQ. A meta-analysis of the association between breastfeeding and early childhood obesity. J Pediatr Nurs 2020; 53: 57-66
  • 6 Amitay EL, Keinan-Boker L. Breastfeeding and childhood leukemia incidence: a meta-analysis and systematic review. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (06) e151025
  • 7 Goldman AS. Evolution of immune functions of the mammary gland and protection of the infant. Breastfeed Med 2012; 7 (03) 132-142
  • 8 Demirci JR, Glasser M, Fichner J, Caplan E, Himes KP. “It gave me so much confidence”: First-time U.S. mothers' experiences with antenatal milk expression. Matern Child Nutr 2019; 15 (04) e12824
  • 9 Davis JA, Glasser M, Clemens M, Eichhorn B, Vats K, Demirci JR. Antenatal milk expression as a lactation support intervention for parents of infants with severe birth defects: a case series. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2022; 36 (04) E25-E30
  • 10 Casey JRR, Mogg EL, Banks J, Braniff K, Heal C. Perspectives and experiences of collecting antenatal colostrum in women who have had diabetes during pregnancy: a North Queensland semistructured interview study. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (01) e021513
  • 11 Juntereal NA, Spatz DL. Mothers' experiences with antenatal milk expression. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2021; 46 (05) 277-283
  • 12 De Bortoli J, Amir LH. Is onset of lactation delayed in women with diabetes in pregnancy? A systematic review. Diabet Med 2016; 33 (01) 17-24
  • 13 Singh G, Chouhan R, Sidhu K. Effect of antenatal expression of breast milk at term in reducing breast feeding failures. Med J Armed Forces India 2009; 65 (02) 131-133
  • 14 Johns HM, Forster DA, Amir LH, McLachlan HL. Prevalence and outcomes of breast milk expressing in women with healthy term infants: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 212
  • 15 Forster DA, Moorhead AM, Jacobs SE. et al. Advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breastmilk in late pregnancy (Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing [DAME]): a multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 389 (10085): 2204-2213
  • 16 Morton J. . Hand Expression of Breastmilk. 2006. Accessed October 1, 2020 at: https://med.stanford.edu/newborns/professional-education/breastfeeding/hand-expressing-milk.html
  • 17 Brisbane JM, Giglia RC. Experiences of expressing and storing colostrum antenatally: a qualitative study of mothers in regional Western Australia. J Child Health Care 2015; 19 (02) 206-215
  • 18 Moorhead AM, Amir LH, Forster DA, Crawford SB. ‘Is there any point in me doing this?’ Views and experiences of women in the Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing (DAME) trial. Matern Child Nutr 2022; 18 (02) e13307
  • 19 Fair FJ, Watson H, Gardner R, Soltani H. Women's perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey. Reprod Health 2018; 15 (01) 58
  • 20 Sobik S, Crimmins M, Hand M, Blake L, Andres A. Education and experiences of antenatal breast milk expression: a systematic review. Breastfeed Med 2023; 18 (02) 107-115
  • 21 Duryea EL, Hawkins JS, McIntire DD, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. A revised birth weight reference for the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (01) 16-22
  • 22 Adamkin DH. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term infants. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (03) 575-579
  • 23 Marshall NE, Lau B, Purnell JQ, Thornburg KL. Impact of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention on lactation intensity and duration. Matern Child Nutr 2019; 15 (02) e12732
  • 24 Leonard SA, Labiner-Wolfe J, Geraghty SR, Rasmussen KM. Associations between high prepregnancy body mass index, breast-milk expression, and breast-milk production and feeding. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 93 (03) 556-563
  • 25 Nommsen-Rivers LA. Does insulin explain the relation between maternal obesity and poor lactation outcomes? An overview of the literature. Adv Nutr 2016; 7 (02) 407-414
  • 26 Rassie K, Mousa A, Joham A, Teede HJ. Metabolic conditions including obesity, diabetes, and polycystic ovary syndrome: implications for breastfeeding and breastmilk composition. Semin Reprod Med 2021; 39 (3-04): 111-132
  • 27 Stark J, Simma B, Blassnig-Ezeh A. Incidence of hypoglycemia in newborn infants identified as at risk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33 (18) 3091-3096
  • 28 Oza-Frank R, Moreland JJ, McNamara K, Geraghty SR, Keim SA. Early lactation and infant feeding practices differ by maternal gestational diabetes history. J Hum Lact 2016; 32 (04) 658-665
  • 29 Chen S, Washio Y, Liu A, Acker C, Herrine G. Teaching antenatal hand expression: a feasibility study in an inner urban U.S. hospital. Int Breastfeed J 2023; 18 (01) 39
  • 30 Garner CD, Ratcliff SL, Thornburg LL, Wethington E, Howard CR, Rasmussen KM. Discontinuity of breastfeeding care: “There's no captain of the ship”. Breastfeed Med 2016; 11 (01) 32-39
  • 31 O'Sullivan TA, Cooke J, McCafferty C, Giglia R. Online video instruction on hand expression of colostrum in pregnancy is an effective educational tool. Nutrients 2019; 11 (04) 883
  • 32 Hinic K. Predictors of breastfeeding confidence in the early postpartum period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2016; 45 (05) 649-660