J Wrist Surg 2025; 14(05): 412-418
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787179
Scientific Article

Medium-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes after Surgical Management of Perilunate Injury: A Multiinstitutional Experience

Authors

  • Andrew M. Gabig

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Samuel H. Payne

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Adam Whitsett

    2   Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Sara Kebede

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Avani A. Patel

    3   Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
  • William Knaus

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Paul Ghareeb

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Background

There is a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment of perilunate injuries (PLIs). Open reduction with internal fixation with scapholunate (SL) ligament repair is recommended; however, procedures such as lunotriquetral (LT) ligament repair, carpal tunnel release (CTR), proximal row carpectomy, denervation, and arthrodesis may also be used.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgical management of PLIs.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of surgically treated PLIs at two institutions in a major metropolitan city from 2014 to 2020 was conducted. Demographics, radiographic data, and details of surgical management were reviewed. PROs were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

Eighty-seven patients with surgically managed PLIs were identified. The average time to surgery was 4 ± 7days. Twenty-six percent of patients presented with acute median neuropathy. Thirty-seven patients provided PROs for analysis. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores were 22 ± 12.9, 14.4 ± 11.3, and 37 ± 22 for pain, function, and total scores, respectively. Satisfaction was 7 ± 3 Sixteen percent of patients were unable to maintain employment due to their injury. The interval to return to work was 6.3 ± 7.7 months.

Conclusion

PLIs cause significant morbidity and affect patients' ability to return to work. While open reduction with SL repair is routinely performed to treat PLIs, additional procedures may be considered. Undergoing concurrent CTR in the absence of neurological symptoms showed no differences in outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Ethical Approval

All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.


Patients' Consent

All patients were informed of possible participation in compliance with local institutional review board requirements.


Investigation performed at the Emory Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 04. Februar 2024

Angenommen: 01. Mai 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. Juni 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA