Flow Control versus Antisiphon Valves: Late Results Concerning Slit Ventricles and Slit-Ventricle Syndrome

Abstract

Introduction

The aims of the study were firstly to investigate the time course of development of slit ventricles (SV) and slit-ventricle syndrome (SVsyndrome) in hydrocephalic patients shunted as infants and secondly to assess the difference in incidence of SV and SVsyndrome in 2 groups of patients - group A with a conventional valve and group B with an anti-siphon valve.

Patients and Methods

27 infant patients with hydrocephalus received a ventriculoperitoneal shunt and were followed prospectively with annual clinic visits and at least two CT or MRI scans postoperatively. The scans were assessed for SV, and ventricular and parenchymal surface and cortical mantle thickness were measured. Revisions for shunt malfunction were recorded.

Results

SV were more frequent than SVsyndrome and developed within 6.5 months postoperatively in 21 % of patients and 48 % after 6 years. No significant difference in incidence of SV or in the surface and cortical mantle thickness were found between the two groups. Two patients (40 %) with early development of SV developed SVsyndrome, and the relative risk for shunt revision was significantly higher in patients who developed SV early. 48 % of patients did not need emergency shunt revision during the first 9 years.

Conclusion

SV develop over years. The majority of patients with SV remain asymptomatic. No significant difference between the two groups was found concerning SV and SVsyndrome. If SV develop early in the postoperative period, complications are more frequent in the long-term, so elective valve adjustment should be considered.

Key words

Hydrocephalus - slit ventricle - slit-ventricle syndrome

References

• 1 Baskin J J, Manwaring K H, Rekate H L. Ventricular shunt removal: the ultimate treatment of the slit ventricle syndrome.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  88 478-484
• 2 Bruce D A, Weprin B. The slit ventricle syndrome.  Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001;  12 709-717, VIII
• 3 Butler W E, Khan S A. The application of controlled intracranial hypertension in slit ventricle syndrome patients with obstructive hydrocephalus and shunt malfunction.  Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;  35 305-310
• 4 Di Rocco C. Is the slit ventricle syndrome always a slit ventricle syndrome?.  Childs Nerv Syst. 1994;  10 49-58
• 5 Drake J M, Kestle J R, Milner R. et al . Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  43 294-305
• 6 Francel P C, Stevens F A, Tompkins P, Pollay M. The importance of valve alignment in determining the pressure/flow characteristics of differential pressure shunt valves with anti-gravity devices.  Childs Nerv Syst. 2001;  17 163-167
• 7 Horner E, Marchand S, Kaiser G L. Ventricular and parenchymal surface before and after shunting - do they have prognostic significance?.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  11 S28-S31
• 8 Horner E. Konventionelles Ventil versus Anti-Sog-Ventil in der Behandlung des Neugeborenen- und Säuglings-Hydrocephalus. Thesis. Berne; Medical Faculty 2001
• 9 Kaiser G L, Horner E, Marchand S, Jost A. Conventional versus Delta valve in the treatment of hydrocephalus in early infancy.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997;  7 (Suppl 1) S45-S46
• 10 Pollay M. Optimal Delta® Valve Placement: The Principles of Siphon Control. Medical Education Series. Goleta; PS Medical 1999
• 11 Rekate H L. Classification of slit-ventricle syndromes using intracranial pressure monitoring.  Pediatr Neurosurg. 1993;  19 15-20
• 12 Rohde V, Mayfrank L, Ramakers V T, Gilsbach J M. Four-year experience with the routine use of the programmable Hakim valve in the management of children with hydrocephalus.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;  140 1127-1134
• 13 Tuli S, O'Hayon B, Drake J, Clarke M, Kestle J. Change in ventricular size and effect of ventricular catheter placement in pediatric patients with shunted hydrocephalus.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  45 1329-1333; discussion 1333 - 1335