Download PDF
neuroreha 2022; 14(01): 27-33
DOI: 10.1055/a-1729-3431
Schwerpunkt

Gehfähigkeit und Mobilität

Jan Mehrholz
,
Bernhard Elsner
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Eines der wichtigsten Rehabilitationsziele nach Schlaganfall ist die Gehfähigkeit. Die Prognosefaktoren sind vielfältig und klinisch leicht zu erheben. Sie umfassen beispielsweise die Gehgeschwindigkeit, die Gangausdauer, die Schrittzahl, die Balance und die Angst vor Stürzen. Zu erleben, wie sich diese Items verbessern, hat womöglich günstige Auswirkungen auf den Langzeitverlauf.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 March 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bonita R, Solomon N, Broad JB. Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability: Estimates from the Auckland stroke studies. Stroke 1997; 28: 1898-1902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 O’Mahony PG, Thomson RG, Dobson R. et al. The prevalence of stroke and associated disability. J Public Health Med 1999; 21: 166-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bohannon RW. Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: Selected variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 777-781
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR. et al. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke 2006; 37: 872-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Eng JJ, Chu KS, Dawson AS. et al. Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: Relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion. Stroke 2002; 33: 756-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mehrholz J. Den Gang zuverlässig beurteilen. Zur Gehfähigkeit nach Schlaganfall: Die deutschsprachige Version der „Functional Ambulation Categories“ (FAC) – Reliabilität und konkurrente Validität. Z f Physiotherapeuten 2007; 59: 1096-1102
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Higgins J. et al. Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1204-1212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wade D. Measurement in stroke rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Hsu HW. et al. Psychometric comparisons of 3 functional ambulation measures for patients with stroke. Stroke 2010; 41: 2021-2025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. et al. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1530-1539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K. et al. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1314-1319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Kugler J. et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10: CD006185 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Time dependency of walking classification in stroke. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 618-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 van Loo MA, Moseley AM, Bosman JM. et al. Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of walking speed measurement after traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 775-779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 306-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ada L, Dean CM, Hall JM. et al. A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: A placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1486-1491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hesse S, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Apparative Ganganalyse in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. Phys Rehab Kur Med 2000; 29-33
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Perry J. Gait analysis, normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Evans MD, Goldie PA, Hill KD. Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 725-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 119-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Turnbull GI, Charteris J, Wall JC. A comparison of the range of walking speeds between normal and hemiplegic subjects. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995; 27: 175-182
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Wagenaar RC, Beek WJ. Hemiplegic gait: A kinematic analysis using walking speed as a basis. J Biomech 1992; 25: 1007-1015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Roth EJ, Merbitz C, Mroczek K. et al. Hemiplegic gait: Relationships between walking speed and other temporal parameters. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 128-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Rückriem S. et al. Geschwindigkeitstraining auf dem Laufband nach Schlaganfall: Eine Einzelfallstudie. Z f Physiotherapeuten 2002; 54: 378-386
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Robinett CS, Vondran MA. Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities: A clinical report. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 1371-1373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hill K, Ellis P, Bernhardt J. et al. Balance and mobility outcomes for stroke patients: A comprehensive audit. Australian Physiotherapy 1997; 43: 173-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C. et al. Hemiplegic gait: Analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 583-587
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC. Effect of duration of upper- and lower-extremity rehabilitation sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 432-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bohannon RW, Andrews AW. Correlation of knee extensor muscle torque and spasticity with gait speed in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 330-333
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Richards C, Olney S. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part II: Recovery and physical therapy. Gait Posture 1996; 4: 149-162
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1074-1082
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK. et al. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995; 26: 982-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jylha M, Guralnik JM, Balfour J. et al. Walking difficulty, walking speed, and age as predictors of self-rated health: The women’s health and aging study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56: M609-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D. et al. Ageing and the relationship between functional status and self-rated health in elderly men. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1527-1536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C. et al. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2002; 33: 553-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Wade DT. Measurement in neurologic rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 1993; 6: 778-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wade DT. Neurologic rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 1993; 6: 753-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Richards C, Malouin F, Dumas F. et al. Gait velocity as an outcome measure of locomotor recovery after stroke. In: Craik R, Oatis C. eds. Gait Analysis: Theory and Application. St Louis: Mosby; 1995: 355-364
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Andriachi T, Ogle J, Galante J. Walking speed as a basis for normal and abnormal gait measures. J Biomech 1977; 10: 262-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lehmann JF, Condon SM, Price R. et al. Gait abnormalities in hemiplegia: Their correction by ankle-foot orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 763-771
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Multivariate examination of data from gait analysis of persons with stroke. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 814-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hesse SA, Jahnke MT, Bertelt CM. et al. Gait outcome in ambulatory hemiparetic patients after a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program and prognostic factors. Stroke 1994; 25: 1999-2004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Pomeroy VM, Pramanik A, Sykes L. et al. Agreement between physiotherapists on quality of movement rated via videotape. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 264-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 415-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ. et al. The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 1985; 132: 919-923
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI. et al. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 1073-1080
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI. et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83 (Suppl. 02) S7-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Podsialo D, Richardson S. The timed „Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: The „get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 387-389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 896-903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Carr J, Shepherd R. Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for exercises and training. Elsevier Group; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF. et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991; 13: 50-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L. et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 65: 175-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: Concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 195-197
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, de Groot IJ. et al. Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 119-129 DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr585oa.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Veerbeek JM, Van Wegen EE, Harmeling-Van der Wel BC. et al. Is accurate prediction of gait in nonambulatory stroke patients possible within 72 hours poststroke? The EPOS study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 268-274 DOI: 10.1177/1545968310384271.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Bijleveld-Uitman M, van de Port I, Kwakkel G. Is gait speed or walking distance a better predictor for community walking after stroke?. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2013; 45: 535-540 DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1147.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Durcan S, Flavin E, Horgan F. Factors associated with community ambulation in chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38: 245-249 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1035460.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Elbers RG, van Wegen EE, Verhoef J. et al. Is gait speed a valid measure to predict community ambulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease?. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2013; 45: 370-375 DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1123.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 das Nair R, Moreton BJ, Lincoln NB. Rasch analysis of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011; 43: 944-950 DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0858.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Wu CY, Chuang LL, Lin KC. et al. Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1281-1287 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.008.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Handlery R, Regan EW, Stewart JC. et al. Predictors of daily steps at 1-year poststroke: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2021; 52: 1768-1777 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034249.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Kawajiri H, Mishina H, Asano S. et al. Maximum walking speed at discharge could be a prognostic factor for vascular events in patients with mild stroke: A cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 230-238 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.025.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Khanittanuphong P, Tipchatyotin S. Correlation of the gait speed with the quality of life and the quality of life classified according to speed-based community ambulation in Thai stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation 2017; 41: 135-141 DOI: 10.3233/NRE-171465.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Louie DR, Eng JJ. Berg Balance Scale score at admission can predict walking suitable for community ambulation at discharge from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2018; 50: 37-44 DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2280.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Minor M, Jaywant A, Toglia J. et al. Discharge rehabilitation measures predict activity limitations in patients with stroke six months after inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Mulder M, Nijland RH, van de Port IG. et al. Prospectively classifying community walkers after stroke: Who are they?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 2113-2118 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.04.017.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Outermans J, van de Port I, Wittink H. et al. How strongly is aerobic capacity correlated with walking speed and distance after stroke? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 2015; 95: 835-853 DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140081.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar