Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e1241-e1247
DOI: 10.1055/a-2008-8540
Original Article

Rate of Primary Cesarean Delivery by Language Preference among Nulliparas

Lizelle Comfort
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
,
Meaghan Jain 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
,
Haotian Wu
2   Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
,
Lisa Nathan
3   Department of Obstetrics, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Sociodemographic factors such as race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status affect primary cesarean delivery rates. Language is associated with disparate health care outcomes but has not been well studied in obstetrics. We examined the association between primary unscheduled cesarean delivery rate and preferred patient language.

Study Design A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban medical center between January 2017 and January 2020. Nulliparous women with early or full-term gestation and having no obstetric or medical contraindication to vaginal delivery were included. We used multivariable linear and logistic regressions to evaluate language differences in cesarean delivery odds and indication for cesarean.

Results Of the 1,314 eligible women, 76.8% of patients preferred English, 17.8% Spanish, and 5.4% other languages. Overall cesarean delivery rate was 27.6%. Controlling for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, insurance, gravidity, pregnancy comorbidities, labor induction, and infant birth weight, Spanish- and other language-speaking women had significantly higher odds of undergoing cesarean compared with English-speaking women (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25, 2.46). Relative proportions of indications for cesarean did not differ by language group. Documented interpreter use was an effect modifier on the relationship between language preference and cesarean (OR with interpreter use: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.90, 4.39).

Conclusion Primary cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher among nulliparous women who prefer languages other than English. This difference may reflect lack of communication, provider bias or discrimination, or other factors, and should be further studied. Interpreter services should be routinely utilized and documented effectively.

Key Points

  • Women who prefer languages other than English had higher odds of cesarean.

  • Indication for cesarean did not differ by language.

  • Interpreter use did not reduce risk for cesarean.

Keywords

patient language - disparities - obstetrics - cesarean delivery - professional interpreter

Authors' Contributions

L.C. developed the project, wrote and submitted the IRB, performed data collection and analysis, and wrote the manuscript; M.J. performed data collection and analysis, wrote and edited the manuscript; H.W. performed statistical design, power calculations and statistical analysis, wrote the methods portion of the manuscript, and created the tables; L.N. was the PI of the project and assisted in project design and development, provided institutional labor and delivery data and statistics, wrote a significant portion of the manuscript including the discussion, and edited the manuscript in various stages.




Publication History

Received: 19 March 2022

Accepted: 16 December 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
06 January 2023

Article published online:
15 February 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (03) 179-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Milcent C, Zbiri S. Prenatal care and socioeconomic status: effect on cesarean delivery. Health Econ Rev 2018; 8 (01) 7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2019; 68 (13) 1-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Declercq E, Menacker F, Macdorman M. Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002. Am J Public Health 2006; 96 (05) 867-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Washington S, Caughey AB, Cheng YW, Bryant AS. Racial and ethnic differences in indication for primary cesarean delivery at term: experience at one U.S. institution. Birth 2012; 39 (02) 128-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Divi C, Koss RG, Schmaltz SP, Loeb JM. Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: a pilot study. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19 (02) 60-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Karliner LS, Kim SE, Meltzer DO, Auerbach AD. Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. J Hosp Med 2010; 5 (05) 276-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 DuBard CA, Gizlice Z. Language spoken and differences in health status, access to care, and receipt of preventive services among US Hispanics. Am J Public Health 2008; 98 (11) 2021-2028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res 2007; 42 (02) 727-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lee JS, Pérez-Stable EJ, Gregorich SE. et al. Increased access to professional interpreters in the hospital improves informed consent for patients with limited English proficiency. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32 (08) 863-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sentell T, Chang A, Ahn HJ, Miyamura J. Maternal language and adverse birth outcomes in a statewide analysis. Women Health 2016; 56 (03) 257-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schaefer KM, Modest AM, Hacker MR. et al. Language preference and risk of primary cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study. Matern Child Health J 2021; 25 (07) 1110-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 U.S. Census Bureau (2019). American Community Survey. Retrieved Aug 8, 2022 at: https://data.census.gov/
    PubMed
  • 14 Janevic T, Loftfield E, Savitz DA, Bradley E, Illuzzi J, Lipkind H. Disparities in cesarean delivery by ethnicity and nativity in New York City. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18 (01) 250-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Zlot AI, Jackson DJ, Korenbrot C. Association of acculturation with cesarean section among Latinas. Matern Child Health J 2005; 9 (01) 11-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 17 van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 2011; 45 (03) 1-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Doximity. Understanding communication trends between U.S. physicians and patients. Language Barriers in U.S. Health Care. Accessed August 10, 2021, at: https://press.doximity.com/articles/first-ever-national-study-to-examine-different-languages-spoken-by-us-doctors
    PubMed
  • 19 Diamond L, Izquierdo K, Canfield D, Matsoukas K, Gany F. A systematic review of the impact of patient-physician non-English language concordance on quality of care and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (08) 1591-1606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Steinberg EM, Valenzuela-Araujo D, Zickafoose JS, Kieffer E, DeCamp LR. The “battle” of managing language barriers in health care. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2016; 55 (14) 1318-1327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar