Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2257-3106
SMFM Fellows Research Series

Sonographic Predictors of Antepartum Bleeding in Placenta Previa

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Modesto, California
,
Adebayo A. Adesomo
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Jessica Russo
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Cynthia Shellhaas
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the association between sonographic features of placenta previa and vaginal bleeding (VB).

Study Design Retrospective cohort study of women with placenta previa identified on ultrasound between 160/7 and 276/7 weeks gestation. Placental distance past the cervical os (DPO), placental thickness, edge angle, and cervical length (CL) were measured. The primary outcome was any VB and the secondary outcome was VB requiring delivery. Median values of the sonographic features were compared for each of the outcomes using the Mann–Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the predictive value of sonographic variables markers and to determine optimal cut points for each measurement. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between each measure and the outcomes while controlling for confounders.

Results Of 149 women with placenta previa, 37% had VB and 15% had VB requiring delivery. Women with VB requiring delivery had significantly more episodes of VB than those who did not require delivery for VB (1.5, interquartile range [IQR] [1–3] vs 1.0 [1–5]; p = 0.001). In univariate analysis, women with VB had decreased CL (3.9 vs. 4.2 cm; p < 0.01) compared with those without. Women with VB requiring delivery had increased DPO (2.6 cm IQR [1.7–3.3] vs. 1.5 cm [1.1–2.4], p = 0.01) compared with those without. After adjusting for confounders, only CL < 4 cm remained independently associated with increased risk of VB (adjusted odds ratio: 2.27, 95% confidence interval [1.12–4.58], p = 0.01). None of the measures were predictive of either outcome (area under the curve < 0.65)

Conclusion Decreased CL may be associated with risk of VB in placenta previa.

Key Points

  • Placenta previa is associated with VB.

  • Sonographic markers of placenta previa are associated with VB.

  • CL is associated with VB in placenta previa, whereas placental DPO is associated with higher rates of bleeding leading to delivery.

Note

This study was presented as Poster 452 entitled “Sonographic Predictors of Antepartum Bleeding in Placenta Previa” at the 40th Annual Pregnancy Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, February 2020, Grapevine, Texas.




Publication History

Received: 03 November 2021

Accepted: 28 January 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 January 2024

Article published online:
01 March 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Vergani P, Ornaghi S, Pozzi I. et al. Placenta previa: distance to internal os and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (03) 266.e1-266.e5
  • 2 Durst JK, Tuuli MG, Temming LA, Hamilton O, Dicke JM. Resolution of a low-lying placenta and placenta previa diagnosed at the midtrimester anatomy scan. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37 (08) 2011-2019
  • 3 Eichelberger KY, Haeri S, Kessler DC, Swartz A, Herring A, Wolfe HM. Placenta previa in the second trimester: sonographic and clinical factors associated with its resolution. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28 (09) 735-739
  • 4 Baumfeld Y, Herskovitz R, Niv ZB, Mastrolia SA, Weintraub AY. Placenta associated pregnancy complications in pregnancies complicated with placenta previa. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 56 (03) 331-335
  • 5 Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #44: management of bleeding in the late preterm period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (01) B2-B8
  • 6 Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K. et al. Predisposing factors for massive hemorrhage during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34 (01) 80-84
  • 7 Gabbe SG, Landon MB, Galan H. et al. Gabbe's Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Saunders; 8th ed. 2020: 23
  • 8 Zaitoun MM, El Behery MM, Abd El Hameed AA, Soliman BS. Does cervical length and the lower placental edge thickness measurement correlates with clinical outcome in cases of complete placenta previa?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284 (04) 867-873
  • 9 Stafford IA, Dashe JS, Shivvers SA, Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Ultrasonographic cervical length and risk of hemorrhage in pregnancies with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (03) 595-600
  • 10 Ghi T, Contro E, Martina T. et al. Cervical length and risk of antepartum bleeding in women with complete placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33 (02) 209-212
  • 11 Shukunami K, Nishijima K, Kurokawa T. et al. A small-angled thin edge of the placenta predicts abnormal placentation at delivery. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24 (03) 331-335
  • 12 Ghourab S, Al-Jabari A. Placental migration and mode of delivery in placenta previa: transvaginal sonographic assessment during the third trimester. Ann Saudi Med 2000; 20 (5-6): 382-385
  • 13 Ghourab S. Third-trimester transvaginal ultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18 (02) 103-108
  • 14 Liu X. Classification accuracy and cut point selection. Stat Med 2012; 31 (23) 2676-2686
  • 15 Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (04) 927-941
  • 16 Ruiter L, Eschbach SJ, Burgers M. et al. Predictors for emergency cesarean delivery in women with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33 (14) 1407-1414