Download PDF
Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie up2date 2016; 10(05): 309-328
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-110848
Perioperative Medizin
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Checklisten & Co.: Instrumente zur Förderung der Patientensicherheit in der Chirurgie

T. Manser
1   Institut für Patientensicherheit, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
D. Berning
2   Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
S. Huckels-Baumgart
1   Institut für Patientensicherheit, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 October 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

In den letzten Jahren wurden zahlreiche Maßnahmen entwickelt, um die Patientensicherheit in der Chirurgie zu erhöhen. Ein Meilenstein hierbei war die Implementierung von OP-Checklisten und Team-Time-out in vielen Krankenhäusern, deren positive Auswirkungen durch die Reduktion von postoperativen Komplikationen und Mortalitätsraten bei konsequenter Umsetzung belegt ist. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, einen Überblick über die zentralen Anforderungen und Maßnahmen zur Gewährleistung und Verbesserung der Patientensicherheit mit Fokus auf die Chirurgie zu geben. Einen besonderen Schwerpunkt bilden hierbei der Einsatz von Checklisten für Routine- und für Notfallsituationen sowie die effektive Zusammenarbeit im Team.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado [see comments]. Med Care 2000; 38: 261-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 2001; 322: 517-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R et al. Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals II: preventability and clinical context. N Z Med J 2003; 116: U624
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Baker RG, Norton PG, Flintoft V et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 2004; 11: 1678-1686
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Sari AB, Sheldon TA, Cracknell A et al. Extent, nature and consequences of adverse events: results of a retrospective casenote review in a large NHS hospital. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 434-439
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C et al. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 297-302
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, de Keizer B et al. The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies. Patient Saf Surg 2011; 5: 13
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB et al. Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2013; 206: 253-262
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Almeland SK et al. Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 821-828
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Reason J. Human error: models and management. Br Med J 2000; 320: 768-770
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 High 5s Projekt. www.CIRSmedical.de, Fall-Nr.: 103063; Quelle: High 5s Projekt. Im Internet: http://www.aezq.de/high-5s-toolboxen/implementierungshandbuch.pdf Stand: 06.09.2016
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM et al. The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 365-368
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 World Health Organization – WHO. Safe surgery. Why safe surgery is important. Im Internet: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/ Stand: 06.09.2016
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Marshall S. The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a review of the literature. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 1162-1171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM et al. Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 246-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin – ÄZQ. High 5s Implementierungshandbuch OP-Checklisten. Im Internet: http://www.aezq.de/high-5s-toolboxen/implementierungshandbuch.pdf Stand: 06.09.2016
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Gawande A. The Checklist Manifesto. How to get Things right. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Balzer F, Spies C, Schaffartzik W et al. Patient safety in anaesthesia: assessment of status quo in the Berlin-Brandenburg area, Germany. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 749-752
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Manser T, Frings J, Heuser G et al. The German clinical risk management survey for hospitals: Implementation levels and areas for improvement in 2015. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2016; 114: 28-38
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rothmund M, Kohlmann T, Heidecke CD et al. Einführung und Beurteilung von Maßnahmen zur Fehlerprävention in chirurgischen Kliniken: Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Online-Befragung. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2015; 109: 384-393
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 491-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 De Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1928-1937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sewell M, Adebibe M, Jayakumar P et al. Use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 897-901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Yuan CT, Walsh D, Tomarken JL et al. Incorporating the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist into practice at two hospitals in Liberia. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2012; 38: 254-260
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Urbach DR, Govindarajan A, Saskin R et al. Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1029-1038
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Russ S, Rout S, Sevdalis N et al. Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review. Ann Surg 2013; 258: 856-871
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 143-151
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Flin R, Mitchell L eds. Safer Surgery: analysing Behaviour in the operating Theatre. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13: 330-334
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yule S, Flin R, Maran N et al. Debriefing surgeons on non-technical skills (NOTSS). Cogn Tech Work 2008; 10: 265-274
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 2010; 304: 1693-1700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Manser T. Managing the aftermath of critical incidents: Meeting the needs of health-care providers and patients. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2011; 25: 169-179
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar