Neonatal Facial Movements in the First Minutes of Life-Eye Opening and Tongue Thrust: An Observational Study

ABSTRACT

Infants born by caesarean section (CS) near or at term were observed to display spontaneous facial movements in their first minutes. We hypothesized that those are reproducible. Up to now, nothing was known about the significance, frequency, and determinants of such facial activity. Repetitive eye opening (EO) and tongue thrust (TT) actions were documented during 1 to 5 minutes, 5 to 10 minutes, and 1 to 15 minutes in 102 infants. In addition, 32 infants were recorded on video from minute 2 to minute 10. Infant- and maternal- influencing factors were noted and videos analyzed using Interact (Version 7.1, Mangold International, Arnstorf, Germany). According to our results, 99 of 102 newborns (gestational age, 33 to 42 weeks) performed EO or TT during the first 15 minutes. Preterm and infants with lower Apgar scores and infants born under general anesthesia showed less EO. Infants of smoking mothers, newborns admitted to special care, and infants with lower umbilical artery pH had significantly fewer TT episodes. Within a “normal” population of newborns of > 37 weeks at delivery (n = 57), 97% showed EO and 95% showed TT. In the filmed 32 newborns, infants began EO at 2:40 and TT at 2:34 minutes of life on average. Crying had no influence, but suctioning/intervention reduced EO frequency. In conclusion, EO and TT are occurring regularly during neonatal adaptation. TT seems to be an inborn automatic behavior; numerous occurrences of EO argue for neurological well-being. Both facial actions may initiate maternal-infant attachment.

KEYWORDS

Neonatal facial expression - caesarean section - Apgar - maternal-infant bonding - eye opening - tongue thrust

REFERENCES

• 1 Stern D. The First Relationship-Mother and Infant. Cambridge; Harvard University Press 1977
• 2 Oliver C M, Oliver G M. Gentle birth: its safety and its effect on neonatal behaviour.  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1978;  7 35-40
• 3 Wiberg B. The First Hour of Life; Description of the Early Reciprocal Interaction, and Mother-Infant Behaviour and Development of Their Mutual Relationship [dissertation]. University of Umeå, Sweden 1990 ISBN 91-7174-503-3
• 4 Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant.  Curr Researches Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1953;  32 260-267
• 5 Hankins G D, Martin G I et al.. The Apgar score.  Pediatrics. 2006;  117 1444-1447
• 6 Levine E M, Ghai V, Barton J J, Strom C M. Pediatrician attendance at cesarean delivery: necessary or not?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;  93 338-340
• 7 Bartusseck E, Fatehi S, Motsch J, Grau T. Survey on practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Part 3: Methods in obstetric anaesthesia.  Anaesthesist. 2004;  53 993-1000
• 8 Helwig J T, Parer J T, Kilpatrick S J, Laros R K. Umbilical cord blood acid-base state: What is normal?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  174 1807-1812
• 9 Petrikovsky B M, Kaplan G, Holsten N. Eyelid movements in normal human fetuses.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;  31 299-301
• 10 Griffin R L, Caron F JM, van Geijn H P. Behavioural states in the human fetus during labour.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;  152 828-833
• 11 Stanojevic C, Perlmann J M, Andonotopo W, Kurjak A. From fetal to neonatal behavioural status.  Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  4 59-71
• 12 Kurjak A. The potential of four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonography in the assessment of fetal awareness.  J Perinat Med. 2005;  33 46-53
• 13 Kurjak A, Stanojevic M, Andonotopo W et al.. Behavioural pattern continuity from prenatal to postnatal life-a study by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonography.  J Perinat Med. 2004;  32 346-353
• 14 Einspieler C, Prechtl H FR, Bos A F, Ferrari F, Gioni G. Prechtl's Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term and Young Infants. (Clinics in Developmental Medicine 167) London; MacKeith Press 2004
• 15 Oster H. Facial expression as a window on sensory experience and affect in newborn infants. In: Ekman P, Rosenberg EL What the Face Reveals. New York; Oxford University Press 2005: 320-349
• 16 Camras L A, Oster H, Campos J, Bakeman R. Emotional facial expressions in European-American, Japanese, and Chinese infants.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;  1000 135-151
• 17 Goren C C, Sarty M, Wu P YK. Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants.  Pediatrics. 1975;  56 544-549
• 18 Heimann M, Schaller J. Imitative reactions among 14-21 day old infants.  Infant Ment Health J. 1985;  6 31-39
• 19 Meltzoff A N, Moore M K. Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures.  Child Dev. 1983;  54 702-709
• 20 Ferrari P F, Visalberghi E, Paukner A et al.. Neonatal imitation in rhesus Macaques.  PLoS Biol. 2006;  4(9) 1501-1508
• 21 Anisfeld M. Only tongue protrusion is matched by human neonates.  Dev Rev. 1996;  16 149-161
• 22 Josten B E, Johnson T RB, Nelson J P. Umbilical cord blood pH and Apgar scores as an index of neonatal health.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;  157 843-848
• 23 Nagy E. From imitation to conversation: the first dialogues with human neonates.  Infant Child Dev. 2006;  15 223-232