Synlett
DOI: 10.1055/a-2258-3788
letter
Thieme Chemistry Journals Awardees 2023

Palladium-Catalyzed α-Arylation of Meyers’s Chiral Bicyclic Lactams and a Deprotonative Ring-Opening Sideline

Hsin-Lun Chiang
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
,
Wei-Ting Zhao
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
,
Yi-An Chen
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
,
Yi-Ching Lin
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
,
Pei-Lin Chen
b   Instrumentation Center, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
,
Yen-Ku Wu
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
› Author Affiliations
This work was supported by the Project for Excellent Junior Research Investigators of the National Science and Technology Council in Taiwan (NSTC 112-2628-M-A49-004-MY3).


Abstract

Described is a deprotonative α-arylation reaction of Meyers’s chiral bicyclic lactams (MCBLs) under palladium catalysis, and a substrate-dependent post-transformation. When the bridgehead carbon of the MCBLs is substituted with a methyl or an ethyl group, the initial arylation product undergoes a further rearrangement reaction to give a conjugated framework. On the other hand, substrates bearing a bridgehead isopropyl or aryl group are converted into the corresponding exo-arylation products. Preliminary studies indicated that the rearrangement pathway was promoted by deprotonation and was independent of palladium catalysis. In addition to mechanistic interests, this study demonstrates a modular and divergent synthesis of functionalized lactams.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 27 November 2023

Accepted after revision: 31 January 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
31 January 2024

Article published online:
16 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Sivanandan ST, Shaji A, Ibnusaud I, Johansson Seechurn CC. C, Colacot TJ. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 38
    • 1b Potukuchi HK, Spork AP, Donohoe TJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 4367
    • 2a Hao Y.-J, Hu X.-S, Zhou Y, Zhou J, Yu J.-S. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 955
    • 2b Li S, Wei J, Ren Q, Yue G, Qiu D, Fagnoni M, Protti S. ChemCatChem 2023; 15: e202201555
    • 3a Satoh T, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Nomura M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997; 36: 1740
    • 3b Palucki M, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 11108
    • 3c Hamann BC, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 12382
    • 4a Bellina F, Rossi R. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 1082
    • 4b Novák P, Martín R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2011; 15: 3233
    • 4c Wang M, Wang W, Li D, Wang W.-J, Zhan R, Shao L.-D. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2021; 11: 379
    • 5a Hou W.-Y, Wu Y.-K. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 1220
    • 5b Yang Y.-C, Lin Y.-C, Wu Y.-K. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9286
    • 5c Chang Y.-H, Peng W.-L, Chen I.-C, Hsu H.-Y, Wu Y.-K. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 4660
    • 5d Lin Y.-C, Yen K.-W, Lin H.-J, Yang Y.-C, Wu Y.-K. Chem. Commun. 2021; 57: 12119
    • 6a Meyers AI, Harre M, Garland R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 1146
    • 6b Meyers AI, Wanner KT. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985; 26: 2047
    • 6c Meyers AI, Lefker BA, Wanner KT, Aitken RA. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 1936
    • 6d Meyers AI, Brengel GP. Chem. Commun. 1997; 1
    • 6e Romo D, Meyers AI. Tetrahedron 1991; 47: 9503
    • 6f Trauner D, Danishefsky SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999; 40: 6513
    • 6g Kopach ME, Fray AH, Meyers AI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 9876
    • 7a Meyers AI, Hanreich R, Wanner KT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 7776
    • 7b Meyers AI, Lefker BA. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 1541
    • 7c Meyers AI, Schwarz JB. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 6511
    • 7d Degnan AP, Meyers AI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 2762
    • 7e Kuwahara S, Saito M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 5047
    • 8a He Z.-T, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 11749
    • 8b Cossy J, de Filippis A, Pardo DG. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 3037
    • 9a Williard PG, Hintze MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 8602
    • 9b Reich HJ. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 7130
    • 11a Munchhof MJ, Meyers AI. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 7084
    • 11b Groaning MD, Meyers AI. Chem. Commun. 2000; 1027
  • 12 1-[(1S)-1-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-methylpropyl]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl-1,5-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-one (3a) A 0.71 M solution of LiHMDS was prepared prior to use by adding a 2.5 M solution of BuLi in hexanes (2 mmol, 0.8 mL) to freshly distilled (TMS)2NH (2 mmol, 0.42 mL) in THF (2 mL) at 0 °C and then stirring for 15 min. A 0.71 M solution of LDA was also prepared prior to use by adding a 2.5 M solution of BuLi in hexanes (4 mmol, 1.6 mL) to freshly distilled i-Pr2NH (4 mmol, 0.56 mL) in THF (4 mL) at 0 °C and then stirring for 15 min. A round-bottomed flask was charged with the Meyers lactam 1a (1.0 mmol, 183 mg) and toluene (5.0 mL). The solutions of LiHMDS (1 equiv, 1.41 mL) and LDA (2.0 equiv, 2.82 mL) were added sequentially to the reaction flask at –78 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. The resulting mixture was transferred to a round-bottomed flask containing 4-bromoanisole (1.2 equiv, 1.2 mmol, 224 mg), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%, 11 mg), and PAd3 (6 mol%, 26 mg) at –78 °C. The cooling bath was removed, and the resulting mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h until the reaction was complete (TLC). The reaction was then quenched with aq NH4Cl and the mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite. The filtrate was diluted with EtOAc and extracted sequentially with H2O and brine. The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by flash column chromatography [silica gel, hexanes–EtOAc (2:1)] to give a yellow oil; yield: 142 mg (49%); Rf = 0.33 (hexanes–EtOAc, 2:1). IR (film): 3354, 3012, 2967, 2933, 2914, 2874 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.99 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 5.09 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.12 (qd, J = 6.9, 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.04 (br s, 1 H), 3.85–3.81 (m, 4 H), 2.96 (ddd, J = 9.7, 4.8, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.84–2.70 (m, 1 H), 1.32 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 171.54, 141.37, 138.72, 135.87, 129.24, 128.59, 127.09, 64.41, 64.33, 59.44, 26.18, 21.44, 20.48, 20.15, 17.22. HRMS (EI): m/z [M]+ calcd for C17H23NO3: 289.1672; found: 289.1664.
  • 13 CCDC 2309298 and 2308874 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 2f and 3b, respectively. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
  • 14 Exo- and endo-2a were prepared in four steps from methyl (4-methoxyphenyl)acetate; see the Supporting Information for more details.
    • 15a Jin S.-J, Arora PK, Sayre LM. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 3011
    • 15b Chou H.-H, Wu H.-M, Wu J.-D, Ly TW, Jan N.-W, Shia K.-S, Liu H.-J. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 121