Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20(5): 339-340
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255098
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Where should the Normal Position of the Umbilicus be in the Neonate?

E. Onal1 , O. Turan1 , R. Karabulut2 , I. Hirfanoglu1 , C. Turkyilmaz1 , K. Sonmez2 , Z. Türkyılmaz2 , A. Kapısız2 , A. C. Basaklar2
  • 1Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neonatology, Ankara, Turkey
  • 2Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received January 28, 2010

accepted after revision May 01, 2010

Publikationsdatum:
12. Juli 2010 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the normal position of the umbilicus so as to offer a guide to improve cosmetic results after the repair of congenital abdominal wall defects.

Materials and Methods: The position of the umbilical center was determined in 187 neonates with respect to the xiphoid process, the center of the umbilicus and the pubis. The distance between the xiphoid process and the center of the umbilicus (XU), between the pubis and the center of the umbilicus (PU) and from the xiphoid process to the pubis (XP) were measured while the babies lay in a supine position. The PU:XU ratio was calculated based on these measurements.

Results: Mean XP was 11.93±1.40 cm, mean XU was 7.41±1.08 cm and mean PU was 4.52±0.70 (mean±SD). The PU:XU ratio was calculated as 0.61±0.12 (ratio±SD).

Conclusion: We suggest that the PU:XU ratio should be 0.61 offering an ideal localization in umbilical reconstruction.

References

  • 1 Choudhary S, Taams KO. Umbilicosculpture: a concept revisited.  Br J Plast Surg. 1998;  51 (7) 538-541
  • 2 Abhyankar SV, Rajguru AG, Patil PA. Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an Indian study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 (4) 1153-1157
  • 3 Williams AM, Brain JL. The normal position of the umbilicus in the newborn: an aid to improving the cosmetic result in exomphalos major.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  36 (7) 1045-1046
  • 4 Lee SL, DuBois JJ, Greenholz SK. et al . Advancement flap umbilicoplasty after abdominal wall closure: postoperative results compared with normal umbilical anatomy.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  36 (8) 1168-1170
  • 5 Niranjan NS, Staiano JJ. An anatomical method for re-siting the umbilicus.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 (7) 2194-2198
  • 6 Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA. et al . Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112 (1) 259-265
  • 7 Tan KC, Bianchi A. Circumumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 (5) 339
  • 8 Valla JS, Ordorica-Flores RM. et al . Umbilical one-puncture laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 83-85
  • 9 Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A. et al . Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy.  Urology. 2007;  70 (6) 1039-1042
  • 10 Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A. et al . Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 (6) 1427-1429
  • 11 Scavarda D, Breaud J, Khalil M. et al . Transumbilical approach for shunt insertion in the pediatric population: an improvement in cosmetic results.  Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;  21 (1) 39-43
  • 12 Murphy FJ, Mohee A, Khalil B. et al . Versatility of the circumumbilical incision in neonatal surgery.  Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;  25 (2) 145-147

Correspondence

Dr. Ramazan Karabulut

Gazi University Faculty of

Medicine

Department of Pediatric

Surgery

Gezegen Sokak No.: 1/10, GOP

06670 Ankara

Turkey

Telefon: +90 0312 202 6210

Fax: +90 0312 223 0528

eMail: karabulutr@yahoo.com

    >