C–H Alkylation of Heteroarenes with Alkyl Oxalates by Molecular Photoelectrocatalysis

Fan Xu; Xiao-Li Lai; Hai-Chao Xu

doi:10.1055/a-1296-8652

Synlett, Table of Contents

Synlett 2021; 32(04): 369-372
DOI: 10.1055/a-1296-8652

cluster

Radicals – by Young Chinese Organic Chemists

C–H Alkylation of Heteroarenes with Alkyl Oxalates by Molecular Photoelectrocatalysis

Authors

Fan Xu
Xiao-Li Lai
Hai-Chao Xu ∗

Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology of Fujian Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, 422 South Siming Road, Xiamen 361005, P. R. of China

Abstract

All articles of this category

Dedicated to Professor Ilhyong Ryu on the occasion of his 70^th birthday.

Abstract

An oxidant- and metal-free photoelectrocatalytic C–H alkylation reaction of heteroarenes with alkyl oxalates has been developed. Several classes of heteroaromatics, such as quinolines, isoquinolines, pyridines, and phenanthridines, can be alkylated with tertiary or secondary alkyl oxalates. The photoelectrochemical synthesis employs 2,4,5,6-tetra-9H-carbazol-9-ylisophthalonitrile as a molecular catalyst and allows the oxidative transformations to proceed through evolution of hydrogen without a sacrificial chemical oxidant.

Key words

photoelectrochemistry - photoelectrocatalysis - C–H functionalization - alkyl oxalates - heterocycles

Full Text

References

References and Notes

1a Francke R, Little RD. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 2492
1b Yan M, Kawamata Y, Baran PS. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 13230
1c Horn EJ, Rosen BR, Baran PS. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016; 2: 302
1d Waldvogel SR, Lips S, Selt M, Riehl B, Kampf CJ. Chem. Rev. 2018; 118: 6706
1e Möhle S, Zirbes M, Rodrigo E, Gieshoff T, Wiebe A, Waldvogel SR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 6018
1f Yuan Y, Lei A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019; 52: 3309
1g Feng R, Smith JA, Moeller KD. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017; 50: 2346
1h Yang Q.-L, Fang P, Mei T.-S. Chin. J. Chem. 2018; 36: 338
1i Jiang Y, Xu K, Zeng C. Chem. Rev. 2018; 118: 4485
1j Ye Z, Zhang F. Chin. J. Chem. 2019; 37: 513
1k Xiong P, Xu H.-C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019; 52: 3339
1l Wang H, Gao X, Lv Z, Abdelilah T, Lei A. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 6769
1m Siu JC, Fu N, Lin S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020; 53: 547
1n Meyer TH, Finger LH, Gandeepan P, Ackermann L. Trends Chem. 2019; 1: 63
1o Jiao K.-J, Xing Y.-K, Yang Q.-L, Qiu H, Mei T.-S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020; 53: 300
1p Ackermann L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020; 53: 84

2a Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10075
2b Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
2c Chen J.-R, Hu X.-Q, Lu L.-Q, Xiao W.-J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 2044
2d Narayanam JM. R, Stephenson CR. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011; 40: 102

3a Tajima T, Kurihara H, Fuchigami T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 6680
3b Xiang J, Shang M, Kawamata Y, Lundberg H, Reisberg SH, Chen M, Mykhailiuk P, Beutner G, Collins MR, Davies A, Del Bel M, Gallego GM, Spangler JE, Starr J, Yang S, Blackmond DG, Baran PS. Nature 2019; 573: 398
3c Hou Z.-W, Yan H, Song J.-S, Xu H.-C. Chin. J. Chem. 2018; 36: 909
3d Xu F, Long H, Song J, Xu H.-C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 9017

4 Wayner DD. M, McPhee DJ, Griller D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 132

5a Barham JP, König B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 11732
5b Yu Y, Guo P, Zhong J.-S, Yuan Y, Ye K.-Y. Org. Chem. Front. 2020; 7: 131
5c Liu J, Lu L, Wood D, Lin S. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020; 6: 1317

6 Molecular photoelectrochemistry employs molecules dispersed in solution or attached to an electrode surface as a light absorber, as opposed to interfacial photoelectrochemistry, which uses semiconductor photoelectrodes. For a recent review on synthetic applications of the latter, see: Wu Y.-C, Song R.-J, Li J.-H. Org. Chem. Front. 2020; 7: 1895

7a Moutet J.-C, Reverdy G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982; 654
7b Chiba K, Yamaguchi Y, Tada M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 9035
7c Scheffold R, Orlinski R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983; 105: 7200

8a Yan H, Hou Z.-W, Xu H.-C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 4592
8b Lai X.-L, Shu X.-M, Song J, Xu H.-C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 10626
8c Xu P, Chen P.-Y, Xu H.-C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 14275

9a Wang F, Stahl SS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 6385
9b Huang H, Strater ZM, Rauch M, Shee J, Sisto TJ, Nuckolls C, Lambert TH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 13318
9c Huang H, Lambert TH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 658
9d Huang H, Strater ZM, Lambert TH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 1698
9e Kim H, Kim H, Lambert TH, Lin S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 2087
9f Qiu Y, Scheremetjew A, Finger LH, Ackermann L. Chem. Eur. J. 2020; 26: 3241
9g Zhang W, Carpenter KL, Lin S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 409
9h Cowper NG. W, Chernowsky CP, Williams OP, Wickens ZK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 2093
9i Niu L, Jiang C, Liang Y, Liu D, Bu F, Shi R, Chen H, Dutta Chowdhury A, Lei A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 17693

10 Nawrat CC, Jamison CR, Slutskyy Y, MacMillan DW. C, Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 11270 ; corrigendum: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1724

11a Pitre SP, Muuronen M, Fishman DA, Overman LE. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 3413
11b Zhang X.-Y, Weng W.-Z, Liang H, Yang H, Zhang B. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 4686

12 Gao Y, Wu Z, Yu L, Wang Y, Pan Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 10859

For examples of electrochemical Minisci-type alkylation reactions, see ref. 12 and:

13a Dou G.-Y, Jiang Y.-Y, Xu K, Zeng C.-C. Org. Chem. Front. 2019; 6: 2392
13b Wang Q.-Q, Xu K, Jiang Y.-Y, Liu Y.-G, Sun B.-G, Zeng C.-C. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 5517
13c O’Brien AG, Maruyama A, Inokuma Y, Fujita M, Baran PS, Blackmond DG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 11868
13d Ding H, Xu K, Zeng C.-C. J. Catal 2020; 381: 38

14 Luo J, Zhang J. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 873
15 Photoelectrochemical Alkylation of Hetarenes; General Procedure A 10 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stirrer bar was charged with the appropriate hetarene (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and oxalate (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), together with 4CzIPN (0.002 mmol, 1 mol%), Et₄NPF₆ (0.04 mmol, 0.2 equiv), and MeCN (6 mL). The Schlenk tube was equipped with a reticulated vitreous carbon (100 PPI) anode (0.5 × 1.5 × 1.2 cm) and a platinum plate (1 × 1 cm) cathode. The reaction mixture was bubbled with argon for 15 min and then TFA (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv) was added. LEDs (λ = 455 nm, 20 W) were placed 2 cm to the side of the reactor, and the reaction was carried out with a constant current of 2 mA at about 50 °C (internal temperature) until the substrate was completely consumed (TLC or ¹H NMR). The reaction was then quenched with sat. aq NaHCO₃, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The organic extracts were combined and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc–hexanes).
16 2-Cyclohexyl-4-methylquinoline (3) Colorless oil; yield: 34 mg (76%). ¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.95 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.74–7.65 (m, 1 H), 7.57–7.46 (m, 1 H), 7.18 (s, 1 H), 2.90 (td, J = 12.1, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.69 (s, 3 H), 2.08–2.01 (m, 2 H), 1.95–1.88 (m, 2 H), 1.84–1.78 (m, 1 H), 1.70–1.61 (m, 2 H), 1.53–1.44 (m, 2 H), 1.40–1.33 (m, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 166.6, 147.7, 144.4, 129.6, 129.0, 127.1, 125.5, 123.7, 120.4, 47.7, 32.9, 26.7, 26.2, 19.0.
17 2,9-Diisopropyl-4,7-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (20) Light-yellow solid; yield: 39 mg (67%); mp 129.8–130.3 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.91 (s, 2 H), 7.37 (s, 2 H), 3.52 (hept, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 2.74 (s, 6 H), 1.47 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 12 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 167.4, 145.4, 144.2, 126.7, 121.1, 121.0, 37.3, 23.0, 19.5.
18 4-Cyclohexyl-2,6-dimethylpyridine (21) Colorless oil; yield: 17 mg (45%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.81 (s, 2 H), 2.51 (s, 6 H), 2.43 (tt, J = 12.0, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.92–1.73 (m, 6 H), 1.48–1.35 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 157.6, 157.4, 119.1, 44.0, 33.7, 26.8, 26.2, 24.6.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information (PDF)