Synlett 2020; 31(15): 1491-1496
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1707137
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Azidation of Partially Protected Carbohydrate Derivatives: Efficient Suppression of Acyl Migration

a   Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 30, Tomsk 634050, Russian Federation
b   N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leninsky Prosp. 47, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
,
Alexander I. Zinin
b   N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leninsky Prosp. 47, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
,
Polina I. Abronina
b   N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leninsky Prosp. 47, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
,
Alexander O. Chizhov
b   N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leninsky Prosp. 47, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
,
b   N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leninsky Prosp. 47, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
c   Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Institutsky per. 9, 141701 Dolgoprudnyi, Moscow Region, Russian Federation   Email: leonid.kononov@gmail.com
› Author Affiliations
This work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 16-13-10244-P).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 31 March 2020

Accepted after revision: 11 May 2020

Publication Date:
09 June 2020 (online)


Abstract

Although azidation by nucleophilic substitution is widely used in organic chemistry, it has a limitation for partially protected carbohydrate derivatives under typical reaction conditions used for azidation (heating with NaN3, phase-transfer catalyst (optional), DMF or DMSO) as it can cause substantial migration (70%) of O-acyl protective groups. Several approaches, including the use of a temporary protective group for the unprotected hydroxyl group, to avoid acyl migration have been compared. Addition of excess of ethyl trifluroacetate effectively suppressed benzoyl migration but inhibited substitution of the chlorine atom with the azido group. The most robust procedure involved addition of excess n-butyl formate to the reaction mixture. When this protocol was followed, migration of benzoyl groups in lactose derivatives with free hydroxy group at C-3′ or C-4′ was reduced to 4%, with the yield of the target, partially protected derivatives with an azido group in the aglycone approaching 92%.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 2a Levy DE. In The Organic Chemistry of Sugars . Levy DE, Fügedi P. CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Group; Boca Raton: 2005: 241-284
    • 2b Györgydeák Z, Thiem J. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 2006; 60: 103
    • 2c Tanaka T, Nagai H, Noguchi M, Kobayashi A, Shoda S.-I. Chem. Commun. 2009; 3378
    • 2d Abronina PI, Kachala VV, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2009; 344: 240
    • 2e Beckmann HS. G, Wittmann V. In Organic Azides . Bräse S, Banert K. John Wiley & Sons; Southern Gate: 2010: 469-490
    • 2f Kulkarni SS. In Selective Glycosylations: Synthetic Methods and Catalysts . Bennett CS. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2017: 255-276
    • 2g Kulkarni SS, Wang CC, Sabbavarapu NM, Podilapu AR, Liao PH, Hung SC. Chem. Rev. 2018; 118: 8025
    • 3a Chernyak AY, Sharma GV. M, Kononov LO, Krishna PR, Levinsky AB, Kochetkov NK, Rama Rao AV. Carbohydr. Res. 1992; 223: 303
    • 3b Magnusson G, Chernyak AY, Kihlberg J, Kononov LO. In Neoglycoconjugates: Preparation and Application . Lee YC, Lee RT. Academic Press; San Diego: 1994: 53-143
    • 3c Roy R. In Carbohydrate Chemistry . Boons G.-J. Blackie Academic and Professional; London: 1998: 243-321
    • 3d Fedina KG, Abronina PI, Podvalnyy NM, Kondakov NN, Chizhov AO, Torgov VI, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2012; 357: 62
    • 3e Kushwaha D, Kovác P, Baráth M. In Carbohydrate Chemistry, Proven Synthetic Methods, Vol. 4. Vogel C, Murphy PV. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2017: 183-188
    • 3f Reddy A, Ramos-Ondono J, Abbey L, Velasco-Torrijos T, Ziegler T. In Carbohydrate Chemistry, Proven Synthetic Methods, Vol. 4. Vogel C, Murphy PV. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2017: 201-208
    • 3g Farcet J.-B, Christler A, Kosma P, Herczeg M. In Carbohydrate Chemistry, Proven Synthetic Methods, Vol. 4. Vogel C, Murphy PV. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2017: 295-302
    • 3h Panova MV, Podvalnyy NM, Okun EL, Abronina PI, Chizhov AO, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2018; 456: 35
    • 3i Abronina PI, Zinin AI, Romashin DA, Tereshina VV, Chizhov AO, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2018; 464: 28
    • 3j Kondakov NN, Panova MV, Abronina PI, Zinin AI, Shpirt AM, Kononov LO. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2019; 68: 416
    • 3k Stepanova EV, Abronina PI, Zinin AI, Chizhov AO, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2019; 471: 95
    • 4a Chernyak AY, Sharma GV. M, Kononov LO, Krishna PR, Rao AV. R, Kochetkov NK. Glycoconjugate J. 1991; 8: 82
    • 4b Chernyak AY, Kononov LO, Kochetkov NK. Carbohydr. Res. 1991; 216: 381
    • 4c Chernyak AY, Kononov LO, Krishna PR, Kochetkov NK, Rao AV. R. Carbohydr. Res. 1992; 225: 279
    • 4d Kononov LO, Chernyak AY, Kochetkov NK. Glycoconjugate J. 1993; 10: 325
    • 4e Chernyak AY, Kononov LO, Kochetkov NK. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1994; 13: 383
    • 4f Sherman AA, Kononov LO, Shashkov AS, Zatonsky GV, Nifant’ev NE. Mendeleev Commun. 1998; 9
    • 4g Kornilov AV, Sherman AA, Kononov LO, Shashkov AS, Nifant’ev NE. Carbohydr. Res. 2000; 329: 717
    • 4h Yudina ON, Sherman AA, Nifantiev NE. Carbohydr. Res. 2001; 332: 363
    • 4i Cheshev PE, Khatuntseva EA, Tsvetkov YE, Shashkov AS, Nifantiev NE. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2004; 30: 60
    • 4j Oscarson S, Alpe M, Svahnberg P, Nakouzi A, Casadevall A. Vaccine 2005; 23: 3961
    • 4k Kato H, Böttcher C, Hirsch A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 2659
    • 4l Abronina PI, Podvalnyy NM, Mel’nikova TM, Zinin AI, Fedina KG, Kachala VV, Torgov VI, Kononov LO, Panfertsev EA, Baranova EV, Mochalov VV, Dyatlova VI, Biketov SF. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2010; 59: 2333
    • 4m Sukhova EV, Yashunsky DV, Tsvetkov YE, Kurbatova EA, Nifantiev NE. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014; 63: 511
    • 4n Kondakov NN, Mel’nikova TM, Zinin AI, Torgov VI, Chizhov AO, Gordeeva EA, Bovin NV, Kononov LO. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014; 63: 501
    • 4o Yudina ON, Tsvetkov YE, Nifantiev NE. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2015; 64: 2932
    • 4p Podvalnyy NM, Abronina PI, Fedina KG, Kondakov NN, Zinin AI, Chizhov AO, Torgov VI, Kachala VV, Kononov LO. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2015; 64: 1149
    • 4q Liao G, Zhou Z, Burgula S, Liao J, Yuan C, Wu Q, Guo Z. Bioconjugate Chem. 2015; 26: 466
    • 4r Kondakov NN, Mel'nikova TM, Chekryzhova TV, Mel’nikova MV, Zinin AI, Torgov VI, Chizhov AO, Kononov LO. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2015; 64: 1142
    • 4s Yin Z, Dulaney S, McKay CS, Baniel C, Kaczanowska K, Ramadan S, Finn MG, Huang X. ChemBioChem 2016; 17: 174
    • 4t Sarkar V, Mukhopadhyay B. ChemistrySelect 2016; 1: 5948
    • 5a Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 2596
    • 5b Hotha S, Kashyap S. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 364
    • 5c Dedola S, Nepogodiev SA, Field RA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007; 5: 1006
    • 5d Meldal M, Tornoe CW. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 2952
    • 5e Marra A, Moni L, Pazzi D, Corallini A, Bridi D, Dondoni A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008; 6: 1396
    • 5f Santoyo-Gonzalez F, Hernandez-Mateo F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 3449
    • 5g Najera C, Sansano JM. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009; 7: 4567
    • 5h Chabre YM, Roy R. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 2010; 63: 165
    • 5i Roy R, Shiao TC. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 3924
    • 5j Tiwari VK, Mishra BB, Mishra KB, Mishra N, Singh AS, Chen X. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 3086
    • 5k He XP, Zeng YL, Zang Y, Li J, Field RA, Chen GR. Carbohydr. Res. 2016; 429: 1
    • 5l Latxague L, Gaubert A, Barthelemy P. Molecules 2018; 23: 89
    • 5m Poonthiyil V, Lindhorst TK, Golovko VB, Fairbanks AJ. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018; 14: 11
    • 5n Szekely T, Roy O, Dériaud E, Job A, Lo-Man R, Leclerc C, Taillefumier C. J. Med. Chem. 2018; 61: 9568
    • 5o Haataja S, Verma P, Fu O, Papageorgiou AC, Poysti S, Pieters RJ, Nilsson UJ, Finne J. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 1905
    • 6a Abronina PI, Fedina KG, Podvalnyy NM, Zinin AI, Chizhov AO, Kondakov NN, Torgov VI, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2014; 396: 25
    • 6b Podvalnyy NM, Chizhov AO, Zinin AI, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2016; 431: 25
    • 6c Kononov LO, Fedina KG, Orlova AV, Kondakov NN, Abronina PI, Podvalnyy NM, Chizhov AO. Carbohydr. Res. 2017; 437: 28
    • 6d Stepanova EV, Podvalnyy NM, Abronina PI, Kononov LO. Synlett 2018; 29: 2043
  • 7 Abronina PI, Zinin AI, Malysheva NN, Stepanova EV, Chizhov AO, Torgov VI, Kononov LO. Synlett 2017; 28: 1608
    • 8a Chevallier OP, Migaud ME. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2006; 2: 14
    • 8b Roslund MU, Aitio O, Warna J, Maaheimo H, Murzin DY, Leino R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 8769
    • 8c Dvorakova M, Pribylova M, Pohl R, Migaud ME, Vanek T. Tetrahedron 2012; 68: 6701
    • 9a Graziani A, Passacantilli P, Piancatelli G, Tani S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 3857
    • 9b Cai Y, Ling CC, Bundle DR. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 580
    • 9c Feng J, Ling CC. Carbohydr. Res. 2010; 345: 2450
    • 9d Chien CY, Enomoto-Rogers Y, Takemura A, Iwata T. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017; 155: 440
    • 9e Lassfolk R, Rahkila J, Johansson MP, Ekholm FS, Warna J, Leino R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 1646
    • 10a Zhou Y, Zhang X, Ren B, Wu B, Pei Z, Dong H. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 5385
    • 10b Lv J, Ge J.-T, Luo T, Dong H. Green Chem. 2018; 20: 1987
  • 11 Romanova DA, Avetyan DL, Belyanin ML, Stepanova EV. J. Nat. Prod. 2020; 83: 888
    • 12a Miller BS. J. Chem. Phys. 1960; 33: 889
    • 12b Walker RF. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1968; 29: 985
    • 12c Smithard MA. Solid State Commun. 1974; 14: 407
    • 12d Nakamura H, Sakumoto K, Hara Y, Ochi K. J. Hazard. Mater. 1994; 38: 1
  • 13 Chen C.-C, Rajagopal B, Liu XY, Chen KL, Tyan Y.-C, Lin F, Lin P.-C. Amino Acids 2014; 46: 367
  • 14 Byramova N. É, Ovchinnikov MV, Backinowsky LV, Kochetkov NK. Carbohydr. Res. 1983; 124: C8
    • 15a Bonner TG. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 1962; 16: 59
    • 15b Newman H. J. Org. Chem. 1965; 30: 1287
    • 15c Takatani M, Matsuo I, Ito Y. Carbohydr. Res. 2003; 338: 1073
    • 15d Wuts PG. M. Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken: 2014: 302-303
    • 15e Podvalnyy NM, Zinin AI, Malysheva NN, Kunetskiy RA, Kononov LO. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2014; 33: 213
    • 15f Podvalnyy NM, Malysheva NN, Panova MV, Zinin AI, Chizhov AO, Orlova AV, Kononov LO. Carbohydr. Res. 2017; 451: 12
  • 16 Typical Procedure of Azidation of Chlorides in the Presence of TFAOEt or HCO2Bu Suppressing Acyl Migration To the solution of CPP glycoside 1, 8, or 9 in DMF (2 mL per 0.1 g of substrate), NaN3 (3 equiv) and 18-crown-6 (0.5 equiv) were added followed by addition of TFAOEt or HCO2Bu (see Table 2 for the amounts). The flask was sealed, and the mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 18 h. DMF was evaporated in vacuo, toluene was added (4 × 5 mL) and then concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in EtOAc (30 mL), washed with water (2 × 30 mL), and the aqueous layer was back extracted with EtOAc (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic extract was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure, and dried in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (PhMe → PhMe/EtOAc, 1:1) to give pure APP glycosides 2, 3, or 10, respectively (see Supporting Information for more details). 4-(3-Azidopropoxy)phenyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzoyl-4-O-(2,3,6-tri-O-benzoyl-β-d-galactopyranosyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (2) APP glycoside 2 was prepared from CPP glycoside 1 (150 mg, 0.13 mmol) using the standard procedure (Table 2, entry 6). The final product was crystallized from CH2Cl2–light petroleum to give the title compound as colorless crystals (135 mg, 89%). Rf  = 0.57 (PhMe/EtOAc, 4:1); mp 201–202 °C; [α]D 24 +31.2 (c 0.97, CHCl3). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.99 (tt (app p), J = 6.3 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2N3), 2.66 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-OH Gal), 3.47 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2N3), 3.69 (dd, J 5,6a = 6.6 Hz, J 6a,6b = 10.9 Hz, 1 H, H-6a Gal), 3.77 (dd (app t), J = 6.2 Hz, 1 H, H-5 Gal), 3.91 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2 H, OCH2), 4.02 (ddd, J 5,6b = 2.0 Hz, J 5,6a = 5.7 Hz, J 4,5 = 9.8 Hz, 1 H, H-5 Glc), 4.16 (dd, J 5,6b = 5.9 Hz, J 6a,6b = 10.9 Hz, 1 H, H-6b Gal), 4.20 (dd, J 3,4 = 3.3 Hz, J 4,OH = 6.5 Hz, 1 H, H-4 Gal), 4.27 (dd, J 3,4 = 8.9 Hz, J 4,5 = 9.8 Hz, 1 H, H-4 Glc), 4.52 (dd, J 5,6a = 5.7 Hz, J 6a,6b = 11.9 Hz, 1 H, H-6a Glc), 4.64 (dd, J 5,6b = 2.0 Hz, J 6a,6b = 11.9 Hz, 1 H, H-6b Glc), 4.84 (d, J 1,2 = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, H-1 Gal), 5.16 (d, J 1,2 = 7.7 Hz, 1 H, H-1 Glc), 5.20 (dd, J 3,4 = 3.3 Hz, J 2,3 = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, H-3 Gal), 5.68 (dd, J 1,2 = 7.7 Hz, J 2,3 = 9.6 Hz, 1 H, H-2 Glc), 5.78 (dd, J 1,2 = 7.9 Hz, J 2,3 = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, H-2 Gal), 5.85 (dd, J 3,4 = 8.9 Hz, J 2,3 = 9.6 Hz, 1 H, H-3 Glc), 6.59–6.70 (m, 2 H, OC6H4O), 6.83–6.93 (m, 2 H, OC6H4O), 7.18–7.66 (m, 18 H, Ph), 7.89–8.08 (m, 12 H, H-2(6) Ph). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.7 (CH2CH2N3), 48.2 (CH2N3), 61.9 (C-6 Gal), 62.6 (C-6 Glc), 64.9 (OCH2), 66.8 (C-4 Gal), 69.7 (C-2 Gal), 71.7 (C-2 Glc), 72.7 (C-5 Gal), 73.0 (C-3 Glc), 73.1 (C-5 Glc), 74.1 (C-3 Gal), 76.4 (C-4 Glc), 100.4 (C-1 Glc), 101.2 (C-1 Gal), 115.1, 118.8 (OC6H4O), 128.34, 128.38, 128.40, 128.41, 128.6, 128.8, 128.9, 129.2, 129.49, 129.54, 129.59, 129.61, 129.67, 129.69, 129.78, 129.84, 133.18, 133.22, 133.24, 133.4 (Ph), 151.1 (C-1 OC6H4O), 154.7 (C-4 OC6H4O), 165.0, 165.2, 165.6, 165.72, 165.74, 166.0 (CO). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C63H55N3O18Na+ [M + Na]+: 1164.3373; found: 1164.3357. 4-(3-Azidopropoxy)phenyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzoyl-4-O-(2,4,6-tri-O-benzoyl-β-d-galactopyranosyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (3) APP glycoside 3 was prepared from CPP glycoside 8 (1.500 g, 1.32 mmol) using the standard procedure (Table 2, entry 9). The final product was lyophilized from benzene to give a white foam (1.392 mg, 92%). Rf = 0.43 (PhMe/EtOAc, 4:1); [α]D 24 +10.9 (c 1.00, CHCl3). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.00 (tt (app p), J = 6.3 Hz, 2H, CH2CH2N3), 2.74 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1 H, 3-OH Gal), 3.48 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2N3), 3.54 (dd, J 5,6a = 9.5 Hz, J 6a,6b = 13.4 Hz, 1 H, H-6a Gal), 3.75–3.86 (m, 2 H, H-5 Gal, H-6b Gal), 3.93 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 1 H, OCH2), 3.96–4.06 (m, 2 H, H-3 Gal, H-5 Glc), 4.26 (dd, J 3,4 = 8.9 Hz, J 4,5 = 9.9 Hz, 1 H, H-4 Glc), 4.59 (dd, J 5,6a = 5.7 Hz, J 6a,6b = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, H-6a Glc), 4.71 (dd, J 5,6b = 1.4 Hz, J 6a,6b = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, H-6b Glc), 4.79 (d, J 1,2 = 7.8 Hz, 1 H, H-1 Gal), 5.15 (d, J 1,2 = 7.7 Hz, 1 H, H-1 Glc), 5.35 (dd, J 1,2 = 7.9 Hz, J 2,3 = 9.8 Hz, 1 H, H-2 Gal), 5.54 (d, J 3,4 = 3.3 Hz, 1 H, H-4 Gal), 5.71 (dd, J 1,2 = 7.7 Hz, J 2,3 = 9.8 Hz, 1 H, H-2Glc), 5.82 (dd, J 3,4 = 8.9 Hz, J 2,3 = 9.8 Hz, 1 H, H-3 Glc), 6.58–6.75 (m, 2 H, OC6H4O), 6.83–7.00 (m, 2 H, OC6H4O), 7.07 (dd (app t), J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H, Ph), 7.27–7.73 (m, 16 H, Ph), 7.88–8.13 (m, 12 H, Ph). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.8 (CH2CH2N3), 48.2 (CH2N3), 61.5 (C-6 Gal), 62.8 (C-6 Glc), 64.9 (OCH2), 70.0 (C-4 Gal), 71.6 (C-5 Gal), 71.6 (C-2 Glc), 71.9 (C-3 Glc), 72.8, 73.3 (C-3 Gal or C-5 Glc), 73.7 (C-2 Gal), 76.1 (C-4 Glc), 100.6 (C-1 Gal), 100.7 (C-1 Glc), 115.1 (OC6H4O), 118.9 (OC6H4O), 128.1, 128.4, 128.5, 128.6, 128.6, 128.9, 129.2, 129.5, 129.6, 129.6, 129.7, 129.8, 129.8, 130.1, 133.1, 133.2, 133.3, 133.4, 133.5, 133.5 (Ph), 151.2 (OC6H4O), 154.7 (OC6H4O), 165.2, 165.4, 165.7, 165.8, 165.9, 166.4 (CO). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C63H55N3O18Na+ [M + Na]+: 1164.3373; found: 1164.3360.
  • 17 Basic impurities that allegedly cause acyl migration might also be trapped by addition of acids. However, we strongly discourage adding any acids to the azidation reaction mixture due to the high probability of formation hydrazoic acid, which is a poisonous and highly explosive compound.
  • 18 Bender ML. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953; 75: 5986
    • 19a Jablonski L, Joubert J, Billard T, Langlois BR. Synlett 2003; 230
    • 19b Langlois BR, Roques N. J. Fluorine Chem. 2007; 128: 1318
  • 20 Caution! The formation of EtN3 is expected in this reaction (as follows from Scheme 3). This compound has a boiling point of 50 °C and is heat and impact sensitive. However, no detonation was detected during reactions even at 1.5 g scale.
  • 21 Mansoori Y, Tataroglu FS, Sadaghian M. Green Chem. 2005; 7: 870