Pigtail Catheter versus Large Bore Chest Tube for the Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Children: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

Introduction Pigtail catheter (PGC) insertion due to spontaneous pneumothorax (SPT) in the pediatric population has increased markedly in the last years. However, only few studies examined its efficacy in terms of length of hospitalization, rate of complications, and especially pain management comparing to large bore catheter (LBC) insertion. We sought to compare analgetic drug consumption, efficacy, and complication rate between PGC and LBC in children with SPT.

Materials and Methods This is a single-center retrospective study of pediatric patients that were admitted to the Schneider Children's Medical Center between 2013 and 2021 with a diagnosis of SPT. The following data were collected: type of drainage (PGC or LBC), duration of drainage, length of hospitalization, number of X-rays, complication rate, surgery during hospitalization, readmission due to SPT, and pain management.

Results Seventeen PGC and 23 LBC were inserted in our study. No differences were noted in terms of hospitalization length, tube reposition or replacement, and recurrence of SPT between the groups. Patients with PGC underwent less X-rays comparing to the LBC group (3 X-rays vs. 5, median, p < 0.005). Oral analgesic use in terms of length of therapy was significantly lower in the PGC group than in the LBC group (1 vs. 3+ days, median, p < 0.05). There was no major complication in this cohort.

Conclusion PGC is an effective, safe, and less painful alternative compared with a LBC for the drainage of SPT in children.

Keywords

spontaneous pneumothorax - pigtail catheter - large bore chest tube - pediatric

^* These authors contributed equally to the paper retain the first authorship.

Publication History

Received: 26 March 2023

Accepted: 26 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 May 2023

Article published online:
26 July 2023

• References

• 1 Osuchukwu O, Lopez J, Weaver KL. et al. Asymptomatic non-occult pneumothorax in pediatric blunt chest trauma: chest tube versus observation. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56 (12) 2333-2336
• 2 Chang SH, Kang YN, Chiu HY, Chiu YH. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pigtail catheter and chest tube as the initial treatment for pneumothorax. Chest 2018; 153 (05) 1201-1212
• 3 Dull KE, Fleisher GR. Pigtail catheters versus large-bore chest tubes for pneumothoraces in children treated in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18 (04) 265-267
• 4 Kuo HC, Lin YJ, Huang CF. et al. Small-bore pigtail catheters for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in young adolescents. Emerg Med J 2013; 30 (03) e17
• 5 Rasihashemi SZ, Ramouz A, Amini H. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of a pigtail catheter and chest tube in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized clinical trial study. Turk Thorac J 2021; 22 (06) 459-465
• 6 Riber SS, Riber LPS, Olesen WH, Licht PB. The influence of chest tube size and position in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9 (02) 327-332
• 7 Kulvatunyou N, Erickson L, Vijayasekaran A. et al. Randomized clinical trial of pigtail catheter versus chest tube in injured patients with uncomplicated traumatic pneumothorax. Br J Surg 2014; 101 (02) 17-22
• 8 Kulvatunyou N, Bauman ZM, Zein Edine SB. et al. The small (14 Fr) percutaneous catheter (P-CAT) versus large (28-32 Fr) open chest tube for traumatic hemothorax: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91 (05) 809-813