Eur J Pediatr Surg 2008; 18(2): 80-85
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-965672
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Factors Associated with Definitive Peritoneal Drainage for Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonates

S. Emil1 , 2 , K. Davis1 , I. Ahmad3 , A. Strauss4
  • 1Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA
  • 2Pediatric Surgery, Miller Children's Hospital, Long Beach, CA, USA
  • 3Division of Neonatalogy, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA
  • 4Neonatalogy, Miller Children's Hospital, Long Beach, CA, USA
Further Information

Publication History

received June 4, 2007

accepted after revision July 15, 2007

Publication Date:
25 April 2008 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: Peritoneal drainage (PD) constitutes a definitive therapy for a subset of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). We investigated the factors which may differentiate these patients from those who require a laparotomy (LAP) after initial PD. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all ELBW infants (< 1000 grams) who underwent PD at two tertiary neonatal intensive care units over a 42-month period was performed. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data of the entire patient cohort were collected. Patients who underwent definitive PD were compared to those who required LAP following PD. Statistical comparisons were performed using independent samples t-tests for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results: Sixteen ELBW infants with SIP underwent PD. Five patients (31 %) had definitive PD and 11 (69 %) subsequently required LAP. Patients who had definitive PD had a lower percent band count at diagnosis (3.2 ± 1.5 vs. 18.0 ± 4.8; p = 0.01), and were less likely to require vasopressor therapy at diagnosis and drain placement (40 % vs. 91 %, p = 0.06), 24 hours later (40 % vs. 100 %, p = 0.02), and 48 hours later (20 % vs. 91 %, p = 0.01). There were no other statistically significant differences in any of the measured variables. Survival to discharge was 80 % for PD and 82 % for LAP (p = 1.0). Conclusion: Peritoneal drainage for spontaneous intestinal perforation in ELBW neonates is more likely to be definitive in the absence of bandemia and vasopressor requirement. These may be important factors in deciding whether to proceed to laparotomy.

References

  • 1 Alpan G, Eyal F, Vinograd I. et al . Localized intestinal perforations after enteral administration of indomethacin in premature infants.  J Pediatr. 1985;  106 277-281
  • 2 Aschner J L, Deluga K S, Metlay L A, Emmens R W, Hendricks-Munoz K D. Spontaneous focal gastrointestinal perforation in very low birth weight infants.  J Pediatr. 1988;  113 364-367
  • 3 Azarow K S, Ein S H, Shandling B, Wesson D, Superina R, Filler R M. Laparotomy or drain for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis: who gets what and why?.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1997;  12 137-139
  • 4 Baird R, Puligandla P S, Vil St D, Dube S, Laberge J-M. The role of laparotomy for intestinal perforation in very low birth weight infants.  J Pediatr Surg. 2006;  41 1522-1525
  • 5 Blakely M L, Lally K P, McDonald S. et al . Postoperative outcomes of extremely low birth-weight infants with necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation.  Ann Surg. 2005;  241 984-994
  • 6 Blakely M L, Tyson J E, Lally K P. et al . Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants: outcomes through 18 months adjusted age.  Pediatrics. 2006;  117 e680-e687
  • 7 Buchheit J Q, Stewart D L. Comparison of localized intestinal perforation and necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.  Pediatrics. 1994;  93 32-36
  • 8 Camberos A, Patel K, Applebaum H. Laparotomy in very small premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis or focal intestinal perforation. Postoperative outcome.  J Pediatr Surg. 2002;  37 1692-1695
  • 9 Cass D L, Brandt M L, Patel D L, Nuchtern J G, Minifee P K, Wesson D E. Peritoneal drainage as definitive treatment for neonates with isolated intestinal perforation.  J Pediatr Surg. 2000;  35 1531-1536
  • 10 Davies M RQ. Iatrogenic hepatic rupture in the newborn and its management by pack tamponade.  J Pediatr Surg. 1997;  32 1414-1419
  • 11 Demestre X, Ginovart G, Figueras-Aloy J. et al . Peritoneal drainage as primary management in necrotizing enterocolitis: a prospective study.  J Pediatr Surg. 2002;  37 1534-1539
  • 12 Dimmitt R A, Meier A H, Skarsgard E D, Halamek L P, Smith B M, Moss R L. Salvage laparotomy for failure of peritoneal drainage in necrotizing enterocolitis in infants with extremely low birth weight.  J Pediatr Surg. 2000;  35 856-859
  • 13 Ein S H, Marshall D G, Girvan D. Peritoneal drainage under local anesthesia for perforations from necrotizing enterocolitis.  J Pediatr Surg. 1977;  12 963-967
  • 14 Gollin G, Abarbanell A, Baerg J E. Peritoneal drainage as definitive management of intestinal perforation in extremely low-birth-weight infants.  J Pediatr Surg. 2003;  38 1814-1817
  • 15 Janik J S, Ein S H. Peritoneal drainage under local anesthesia for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) perforation: a second look.  J Pediatr Surg. 1980;  15 565-566
  • 16 Lessin M S, Luks F I, Wesselhoeft C W, Gilchrist B F, Iannitti D, DeLuca F G. Peritoneal drainage as definitive treatment for intestinal perforation in infants with extremely low birth weight (< 750 g).  J Pediatr Surg. 1998;  33 370-372
  • 17 Meyer C L, Payne N R, Roback S A. Spontaneous, isolated intestinal perforations in neonates with birth weight less than 1000 g not associated with necrotizing enterocolitis.  J Pediatr Surg. 1991;  26 714-717
  • 18 Michel J L, Harper L, Alessandri J L. et al . Peritoneal needle suction for intestinal perforation in the preterm neonate.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004;  14 85-88
  • 19 Mintz A C, Applebaum H. Focal gastrointestinal perforations not associated with necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight neonates.  J Pediatr Surg. 1993;  28 857-860
  • 20 Moss R L, Dimmitt R A, Barnhart D C. et al . Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  354 2225-2234
  • 21 Moss R L, Dimmitt R A, Henry M CW, Geraghty N, Efron B. A meta-analysis of peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  36 1210-1213
  • 22 Nagaraj H S, Sandhu A S, Cook L N, Buchino J J, Groff D B. Gastrointestinal perforation following indomethacin therapy in very low birth weight infants.  J Pediatr Surg. 1981;  16 1003-1007
  • 23 O'Connor A, Sawin R S. High morbidity with enterostomy and its closure in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 875-880
  • 24 Pumberger W, Mayr M, Kohlhauser C, Weninger M. Spontaneous localized intestinal perforation in very-low-birth-weight infants: a distinct clinical entity different from necrotizing enterocolitis.  J Am Coll Surg. 2002;  195 796-803
  • 25 Rovin J D, Rodgers B M, Burns R C, McGahren E D. The role of peritoneal drainage for intestinal perforation in infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis.  J Pediatr Surg. 1999;  34 143-147
  • 26 Sharma R, Tepas J J, Mollitt D L, Pieper P, Wludyka P. Surgical management of bowel perforations and outcome in very-low-birth-weight infants (≤ 1200 g).  J Pediatr Surg. 2004;  39 190-194
  • 27 Tam A L, Camberos A, Applebaum H. Surgical decision making in necrotizing enterocolitis and focal intestinal perforation: predictive value of radiologic findings.  J Pediatr Surg. 2002;  37 1688-1691
  • 28 Tepas J J, Sharma R, Hudak M L, Garrison R D, Pieper P. Coming full circle: an evidence-based definition of the timing and type of surgical management of very low-birth-weight (< 1000 g) infants with signs of acute intestinal perforation.  J Pediatr Surg. 2006;  41 418-422

MD, CM, FACS, FRCSC, FAAP Sherif Emil

Division of Pediatric Surgery
UCI Medical Center

Bldg 55; Rm 110; Route 81

101 The City Drive

Orange, CA 92868-3298

USA

Email: semil@uci.edu

    >