Synlett
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775363
letter

Organocatalytic Fischer Indolization Using the 2,2′-Biphenol/ B(OH)3 System

,
Yusei Wada
,
Fumino Kitamura
,
Yuji Matsuya
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKENHI (JP23K06047).


Abstract

An organocatalyzed Fischer indolization is established by combining 2,2′-biphenol (10 mol%) and B(OH)3 (30 mol%) as weak, readily available, and easy-to-handle acids. The inclusion of MgSO4, which efficiently scavenges NH3 (a possible acid catalyst poison), appears to be key to the success of this process. The corresponding indoles are obtained in yields of up to 91% using this method.y

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 15 February 2024

Accepted after revision: 03 May 2024

Article published online:
17 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Present address: Faculty of Science and Technology, Kyoto Prefectural University, 1-5 Hangi-cho, Shimogamo, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8522, Japan; ksugimoto@kpu.ac.jp
    • 2a Horton DA, Bourne GT, Smythe ML. Chem. Rev. 2003; 893
    • 2b de Sa Alves F, Barreiro EJ, Manssour Fraga C. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2009; 9: 782
    • 2c Heterocyclic Scaffolds II: Reactions and Applications of Indoles. In Topics in Heterocyclic Chemistry, Vol. 26. Gribble GW. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg: 2010
    • 2d Biswal S, Sahoo U, Sethy S, Kumar HK. S, Banerjee M. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2012; 5: 1
    • 2e Gribble GW. In Indole Ring Synthesis: From Natural Products to Drug Discovery. John Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 2016
    • 3a Gribble GW. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000; 1045
    • 3b Humphrey GR, Kuethe JT. Chem. Rev. 2006; 106: 2875
    • 3c Taber DF, Tirunahari PK. Tetrahedron 2011; 67: 7195
    • 3d Inman M, Moody CJ. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 29
    • 4a Robinson B. The Fischer Indole Synthesis . John Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 1982
    • 4b Heravi MM, Rohani S, Zadsirjan V, Zahedi N. RSC Adv. 2017; 7: 52852
  • 5 Gore S, Baskaran S, König B. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 4568
    • 6a Hughes DL. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1993; 25: 607
    • 6b Rao SP, Lakshminarayana SB, Kondreddi RR, Herve M, Camacho LR, Bifani P, Kalapala SK, Jiricek J, Ma NL, Tan BH, Ng SH, Nanjundappa M, Ravindran S, Seah PG, Thayalan P, Lim SH, Lee BH, Goh A, Barnes WS, Chen Z, Gagaring K, Chatterjee AK, Pethe K, Kuhen K, Walker J, Feng G, Babu S, Zhang L, Blasco F, Beer D, Weaver M, Dartois V, Glynne R, Dick T, Smith PW, Diagana TT, Manjunatha UH. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013; 5: 214ra168
    • 6c Kondreddi RR, Jiricek J, Rao SP, Lakshminarayana SB, Camacho LR, Rao R, Herve M, Bifani P, Ma NL, Kuhen K, Goh A, Chatterjee AK, Dick T, Diagana TT, Manjunatha UH, Smith PW. J. Med. Chem. 2013; 56: 8849
    • 6d Yang X, Zhang X, Yin D. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018; 22: 1115
    • 7a With TiCl4 as the catalyst: Ackermann L, Born R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 9541
    • 7b With ZnCl2 as the catalyst: Lipínska TM, Czarnocki SJ. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 367
    • 8a Müller S, Webber MJ, List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 18534
    • 8b Martínez A, Webber MJ, Müller S, List B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 9486
    • 8c Kötzner L, Webber MJ, Martínez A, De Fusco C, List B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5202
    • 8d Kötzner L, Leutzsch M, Sievers S, Patil S, Waldmann H, Zheng Y, Thiel W, List B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 7693
  • 9 Ghosh B, Balhara R, Jindal G, Mukherjee S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 9086

    • pK a1 = 7.6 for 2,2′-biphenol:
    • 10a Jonsson M, Lind J, Merényi G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002; 106: 4758

    • pK a = 9.1 for B(OH)3:
    • 10b Schott J, Kretzschmar J, Tsushima S, Drobot B, Acker M, Barkleit A, Taut S, Brendler V, Stumpf T. Dalton Trans. 2015; 44: 11095
    • 11a Sugimoto K, Oshiro M, Hada R, Matsuya Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2019; 67: 1019
    • 11b Sugimoto K, Yoshida R, Matsuya Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2022; 102: 153922
  • 12 The ratio of 3:1 suggested that the cyclic boroxinate A, which was similar to the VAPOL boroxinate complex reported by Wulff and co-workers13 from VAPOL (1 equiv) and B(OPh)3 (3 equiv), would be generated in situ. However, we have not succeeded in the isolation of the actual active species.
  • 13 For the VAPOL boroxinate catalyst, see: Hu G, Huang RH, Wulff WD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 15615
  • 14 9-Benzyl-3-phenyl-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazole (12a); Typical Procedure A screw-top test tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with 1-benzyl-1-phenylhydrazine (13a) (1 equiv, 27.9 mg, 0.141 mmol) and toluene (0.28 mL, 0.5 M). To the solution were added 4-phenylcyclohexanone (14a) (1 equiv, 24.6 mg, 0.141 mmol), 2,2′-biphenol (10 mol%, 2.62 mg, 0.0141 mmol), B(OH)3 (30 mol%, 2.63 mg, 0.0432 mmol), and MgSO4 (anhydrous, 3 equiv, 50.0 mg, 0.417 mmol) at room temperature. After stirring in refluxing toluene for 4 h using a heating block, the reaction mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite and the filter cake was washed with EtOAc. The organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: n-hexane/EtOAc = 90:10) to afford the indole 12a (42.4 mg, 89%) as a yellow solid. Rf = 0.68 (n-hexane/EtOAc = 80:20). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.48 (dd, J = 6.6, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 4 H), 7.26–7.17 (m, 5 H), 7.13–7.06 (m, 2 H), 6.99 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 5.26 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.20 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.15–3.01 (m, 2 H), 2.88–2.84 (m, 1 H), 2.74–2.73 (m, 2 H), 2.21–2.17 (m, 1 H), 2.13–2.05 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 146.6, 138.1, 136.8, 135.1, 128.7, 128.4, 127.2, 127.0, 126.2, 126.1, 120.9, 119.0, 117.8, 109.7, 109.0, 46.3, 40.9, 30.3, 29.4, 22.2. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were identical with those previously reported.8a